• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝转移瘤:0.5T和1.5T磁共振成像检测

Liver metastases: detection with MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T.

作者信息

Reinig J W, Dwyer A J, Miller D L, Frank J A, Adams G W, Chang A E

机构信息

Anne Arundel MRI, Annapolis, Md.

出版信息

Radiology. 1989 Jan;170(1 Pt 1):149-53. doi: 10.1148/radiology.170.1.2909089.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.170.1.2909089
PMID:2909089
Abstract

Nineteen patients with known liver metastases were examined with two magnetic resonance (MR) pulse sequences at 0.5 T and three pulse sequences at 1.5 T. In addition, the patients were studied with computed tomography (CT) enhanced with ethiodized oil emulsion-13 (EOE-13). At 0.5 T a spin-echo (SE) 300/22 (repetition time/echo time, msec) sequence prospectively demonstrated 92.4% of the detectable liver metastases, while an SE 2,000/80 sequence showed 52.1% of the lesions. At 1.5 T, an SE 300/25 sequence depicted 68.3% and an SE 2,000/80 sequence 71.6%, while the more T1-weighted inversion recovery (IR) 2,000/600 (repetition time/inversion time, msec) sequence demonstrated 89.5% of the lesions. EOE-13 CT scans depicted 93.3%. These findings suggest that T1-weighted imaging is as successful at demonstrating liver metastases at 1.5 T with an IR 2,000/600 sequence as at 0.5 T with an SE 300/22 sequence. At both field strengths, MR imaging of the liver is comparable to state-of-the-art CT.

摘要

对19例已知有肝转移的患者分别采用0.5T的两种磁共振(MR)脉冲序列和1.5T的三种脉冲序列进行检查。此外,还对这些患者进行了用乙碘油乳剂-13(EOE-13)增强的计算机断层扫描(CT)检查。在0.5T时,自旋回波(SE)300/22(重复时间/回波时间,毫秒)序列前瞻性地显示出92.4%可检测到的肝转移灶,而SE 2000/80序列显示出52.1%的病灶。在1.5T时,SE 300/25序列显示出68.3%,SE 2000/80序列显示出71.6%,而更具T1加权的反转恢复(IR)2000/600(重复时间/反转时间,毫秒)序列显示出89.5%的病灶。EOE-13 CT扫描显示出93.3%。这些发现表明,在1.5T时采用IR 2000/600序列进行T1加权成像显示肝转移灶的效果与在0.5T时采用SE 300/22序列相当。在这两种场强下,肝脏的MR成像与先进的CT相当。

相似文献

1
Liver metastases: detection with MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T.肝转移瘤:0.5T和1.5T磁共振成像检测
Radiology. 1989 Jan;170(1 Pt 1):149-53. doi: 10.1148/radiology.170.1.2909089.
2
Liver metastasis detection: comparative sensitivities of MR imaging and CT scanning.肝转移灶检测:磁共振成像与计算机断层扫描的比较敏感性
Radiology. 1987 Jan;162(1 Pt 1):43-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.162.1.3786786.
3
Short TI inversion-recovery imaging of the liver: pulse-sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo imaging.肝脏的短TI反转恢复成像:脉冲序列优化及与自旋回波成像的比较
Radiology. 1989 May;171(2):327-33. doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.2.2704797.
4
Focal hepatic lesions: comparative MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T.局灶性肝脏病变:0.5T和1.5T磁共振成像对比
Radiology. 1990 Jan;174(1):153-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.174.1.2152980.
5
Hepatic metastases: randomized, controlled comparison of detection with MR imaging and CT.
Radiology. 1987 Nov;165(2):399-406. doi: 10.1148/radiology.165.2.3310094.
6
Comparison of inversion-recovery gradient- and spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques in the detection and characterization of liver lesions.反转恢复梯度回波、自旋回波和快速自旋回波技术在肝脏病变检测与特征描述中的比较。
Radiology. 1998 Nov;209(2):427-34. doi: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807569.
7
Optimal pulse sequence for imaging hepatic metastases.用于肝脏转移瘤成像的最佳脉冲序列。
Radiology. 1986 Dec;161(3):727-34. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.3.3786723.
8
Focal liver lesions: characterization with conventional spin-echo versus fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.肝脏局灶性病变:传统自旋回波与快速自旋回波T2加权磁共振成像的特征分析
Radiology. 1997 Feb;202(2):389-93. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015063.
9
Detection of hepatic metastases with MR imaging: spin-echo vs phase-contrast pulse sequences at 0.6 T.0.6T磁共振成像检测肝转移瘤:自旋回波与相位对比脉冲序列的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 Dec;153(6):1207-11. doi: 10.2214/ajr.153.6.1207.
10
Hepatic metastases: CT versus MR imaging at 1.5T.
Gastrointest Radiol. 1991 Spring;16(2):159-63. doi: 10.1007/BF01887334.

引用本文的文献

1
Breath-hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison of fast and ultrasound techniques.肝脏局灶性病变的屏气磁共振成像:快速成像技术与超声技术的比较
Eur Radiol. 1996;6(6):838-43. doi: 10.1007/BF00240685.
2
Liver MR imaging: comparison of respiratory triggered fast spin echo with T2-weighted spin-echo and inversion recovery.肝脏磁共振成像:呼吸触发快速自旋回波与T2加权自旋回波及反转恢复的比较
Abdom Imaging. 1996 Sep-Oct;21(5):433-9. doi: 10.1007/s002619900098.
3
Hepatic MR imaging: comparison of RARE derived sequences with conventional sequences for detection and characterization of focal liver lesions.
肝脏磁共振成像:用于检测和鉴别肝脏局灶性病变的快速采集弛豫增强序列衍生序列与传统序列的比较
Abdom Imaging. 1996 Sep-Oct;21(5):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s002619900097.
4
MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison between turbo spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences.肝脏局灶性病变的磁共振成像:快速自旋回波与传统自旋回波脉冲序列的比较
MAGMA. 1995 Sep-Dec;3(3-4):143-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01771699.
5
Liver lesion detection: comparison between excitation-spoiling fat suppression and regular spin-echo at 1.5T.肝脏病变检测:1.5T场强下激发性扰相脂肪抑制与常规自旋回波的比较
Abdom Imaging. 1993;18(1):56-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00201703.
6
Hepatic metastases: CT versus MR imaging at 1.5T.
Gastrointest Radiol. 1991 Spring;16(2):159-63. doi: 10.1007/BF01887334.