• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期痴呆症患者对家庭支持服务的偏好。

Carer preferences for home support services in later stage dementia.

机构信息

a Personal Social Services Research Unit, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.

b Centre For Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2019 Jan;23(1):60-68. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1394441. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2017.1394441
PMID:29090948
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relative importance of different home support attributes from the perspective of carers of people with later-stage dementia.

METHOD

Preferences from 100 carers, recruited through carers' organisations, were assessed with a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) survey, administered online and by paper questionnaire. Attributes were informed by an evidence synthesis and lay consultations. A conditional logit model was used to estimate preference weights for the attributes within a home support 'package'.

RESULTS

The most preferred attributes were 'respite care, available regularly to fit your needs' (coefficient 1.29, p = < 0.001) and 'home care provided regularly for as long as needed' (coefficient 0.93, p = < 0.001). Cost had a significant effect with lower cost packages preferred. Findings were similar regardless of the method of administration, with respite care considered to be the most important attribute for all carers. Carers reported that completing the DCE had been a positive experience; however, feedback was mixed overall.

CONCLUSIONS

These carer preferences concur with emerging evidence on home support interventions for dementia. Respite care, home care and training on managing difficulties provided at home are important components. Carers' preferences revealed the daily challenges of caring for individuals with later stage dementia and the need for tailored and specialised home support.

摘要

目的

从晚期痴呆患者照顾者的角度探讨不同居家支持属性的相对重要性。

方法

通过照顾者组织招募了 100 名照顾者,使用离散选择实验(DCE)调查评估他们的偏好,该调查通过在线和纸质问卷进行。属性信息来源于证据综合和公众咨询。使用条件逻辑回归模型在居家支持“套餐”内估算属性的偏好权重。

结果

最受欢迎的属性是“定期提供、可根据您的需求安排的临时照料(系数 1.29,p<0.001)”和“定期提供、按需提供的家庭护理(系数 0.93,p<0.001)”。成本具有显著影响,成本较低的套餐更受欢迎。无论采用何种管理方式,调查结果都相似,所有照顾者都认为临时照料是最重要的属性。照顾者报告说,完成 DCE 是一次积极的体验;然而,总体反馈好坏参半。

结论

这些照顾者的偏好与新兴的痴呆症居家支持干预证据相符。临时照料、家庭护理和家庭管理方面的培训是重要的组成部分。照顾者的偏好揭示了照顾晚期痴呆患者的日常挑战,以及对定制和专门化居家支持的需求。

相似文献

1
Carer preferences for home support services in later stage dementia.晚期痴呆症患者对家庭支持服务的偏好。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Jan;23(1):60-68. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1394441. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
2
People with dementia and carer preferences for home support services in early-stage dementia.痴呆症患者及其照顾者对早期痴呆症的家庭支持服务的偏好。
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Feb;22(2):270-279. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1247424. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
4
Providing Informal Care in Terminal Illness: An Analysis of Preferences for Support Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.为绝症患者提供非正式护理:基于离散选择实验的支持偏好分析
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):731-45. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13500719. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
5
Caring for a Person With Dementia on the Margins of Long-Term Care: A Perspective on Burden From 8 European Countries.长期护理边缘的痴呆症患者护理:来自 8 个欧洲国家的负担视角。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):967-973.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
6
Perspectives of Australian family carers of people with dementia on the 'cottage' model of respite: Compared to traditional models of residential respite provided in aged care facilities.澳大利亚痴呆症患者家庭照顾者对“小屋”式暂托模式的看法:与老年护理机构提供的传统住宿式暂托模式相比。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 May;28(3):850-861. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12916. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
7
An exploration of family carers' experience of respite services in one specialist palliative care unit.对一家专科姑息治疗机构中家庭照顾者的喘息服务体验的探索。
Palliat Med. 2005 Dec;19(8):610-8. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1087oa.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an in-home respite care program in supporting informal caregivers of people with dementia: design of a comparative study.一项居家喘息护理项目在支持痴呆症患者非正式照料者方面的有效性和成本效益:一项比较研究的设计
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Dec 2;16(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0373-4.
9
[ Low-threshold support services for people with dementia from the family carers' viewpoint].从家庭照顾者视角看为痴呆症患者提供的低门槛支持服务
Pflege. 2014 Feb;27(1):7-18. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000335.
10
Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Do Family Carers Know the Treatment Preferences of People with Early Dementia?痴呆症患者的预先护理计划:家庭护理人员是否了解早期痴呆症患者的治疗偏好?
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159056. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
The meaning of 'quality' of homecare for older people: a scoping review.老年人居家护理“质量”的含义:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13057-1.
2
Social support interventions for caregivers of older adults with dementia: a scoping review.针对老年痴呆症患者照料者的社会支持干预措施:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):e095815. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095815.
3
Engaging Underserved Populations in Health Preference Research: Challenges and Strategies.让服务不足人群参与健康偏好研究:挑战与策略
Patient. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00745-7.
4
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
5
Preferences for Living Arrangements in Dementia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.痴呆症患者生活安排的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Jan;8(1):65-78. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00452-9. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
6
Dynamics of Interaction among Professionals, Informal Supporters, and Family Caregivers of People with Dementia along the Dementia Care Pathway: A Nationwide Survey in Japan.痴呆症照护路径中专业人员、非正式支持者和痴呆症患者家庭照顾者之间的互动动态:日本全国性调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;20(6):5044. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065044.
7
A systematic review to identify the use of stated preference research in the field of older adult care.一项旨在确定老年人护理领域中陈述性偏好研究应用情况的系统评价。
Eur J Ageing. 2022 Nov 7;19(4):1005-1056. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00738-7. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Dyadic Discrete Choice Experiments Enable Persons with Dementia and Informal Caregivers to Participate in Health Care Decision Making: A Mixed Methods Study.对偶离散选择实验使痴呆症患者和非专业照护者能够参与医疗保健决策:一项混合方法研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;91(1):105-114. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220604.
9
Exploratory pilot study on resource allocation along the dementia continuum under constrained and unconstrained budget scenarios.在受约束和不受约束的预算情况下,对痴呆症连续体资源配置的探索性试点研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 18;22(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03089-1.
10
Persons with dementia and informal caregivers prioritizing care: A mixed-methods study.痴呆症患者及将护理置于优先地位的非正式照料者:一项混合方法研究。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 Aug 6;7(1):e12193. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12193. eCollection 2021.