Department of Rehabilitation, Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences, Sagamihara City, Kanagawa, Japan.
Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira City, Tokyo, Japan.
Occup Ther Int. 2022 Jun 17;2022:2661585. doi: 10.1155/2022/2661585. eCollection 2022.
This study is aimed at verifying a hypothetical model of the structural relationship between the recovery process and difficulties in daily life mediated by occupational dysfunction in severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI).
Community-dwelling participants with SPMI were enrolled in this multicenter cross-sectional study. The Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule second edition (WHODAS 2.0), and the Classification and Assessment of Occupational Dysfunction (CAOD) were used for assessment. Confirmatory factor analysis, multiple regression analysis, and Bayesian structural equation modelling (BSEM) were determined to analyze the hypothesized model. If the mediation model was significant, the path coefficient from difficulty in daily life to recovery and the multiplication of the path coefficients mediated by occupational dysfunction were considered as each the direct effect and the indirect effect. The goodness of fit in the model was determined by the posterior predictive value (PPP). Each path coefficient was validated with median and 95% confidence interval (CI).
The participants comprised 98 individuals with SPMI. The factor structures of RAS, WHODAS 2.0, and CAOD were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis to be similar to those of their original studies. Multiple regression analysis showed that the independent variables of RAS were WHODAS 2.0 and CAOD, and that of CAOD was WHODAS 2.0. The goodness of fit of the model in the BSEM was satisfactory with a PPP = 0.27. The standardized path coefficients were, respectively, significant at -0.372 (95% CI: -0.586, -0.141) from "difficulty in daily life" to "recovery" as the direct effect and at -0.322 (95% CI: -0.477, -0.171) mediated by "occupational dysfunction" as the indirect effect.
An approach for reducing not only difficulty in daily life but also occupational dysfunction may be an additional strategy of person-centered, recovery-oriented practice in SPMI.
本研究旨在验证严重和持久精神疾病(SPMI)患者康复过程与日常生活困难之间结构关系的假设模型,该模型中介于职业功能障碍。
本研究纳入了多中心横断面研究中的社区居住的 SPMI 患者。采用康复评估量表(RAS)、世界卫生组织残疾评估量表 2.0 版(WHODAS 2.0)和职业功能障碍分类和评估(CAOD)进行评估。采用验证性因子分析、多元回归分析和贝叶斯结构方程模型(BSEM)来分析假设模型。如果中介模型具有统计学意义,则认为日常生活困难到康复的路径系数和职业功能障碍介导的路径系数的乘积为直接效应和间接效应。模型的拟合优度通过后验预测值(PPP)来确定。每个路径系数都通过中位数和 95%置信区间(CI)进行验证。
共纳入 98 名 SPMI 患者。通过验证性因子分析,RAS、WHODAS 2.0 和 CAOD 的因子结构与原始研究相似。多元回归分析显示,RAS 的自变量为 WHODAS 2.0 和 CAOD,CAOD 的自变量为 WHODAS 2.0。BSEM 中模型的拟合优度良好,PPP=0.27。标准化路径系数分别为:从“日常生活困难”到“康复”的直接效应为-0.372(95%CI:-0.586,-0.141),以及通过“职业功能障碍”的间接效应为-0.322(95%CI:-0.477,-0.171),均具有统计学意义。
减少日常生活困难和职业功能障碍的方法可能是 SPMI 以患者为中心、以康复为导向的实践的附加策略。