Ioana A. Cristea, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; Robin N. Kok, MSc, Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, and Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, and Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Pim Cuijpers, PhD, Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ioana A. Cristea, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; Robin N. Kok, MSc, Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, and Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, and Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Pim Cuijpers, PhD, Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;211(5):272-273. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.117.200972.
The notion that cognitive bias modification should be appraised exclusively on the basis of trials where its postulated mechanisms were successfully changed starkly contradicts the standards of evidence-based psychotherapy. In the laboratory or as a treatment, cognitive bias modification cannot continue to eschew the rigorous scrutiny applied to other interventions.
那种认为认知偏差修正应该仅仅基于其假设机制成功改变的试验进行评估的观点，与基于证据的心理治疗的标准截然相悖。无论是在实验室还是作为一种治疗方法，认知偏差修正都不能继续回避其他干预措施所应用的严格审查。
