Suppr超能文献

评估腹部内脏脂肪面积的新型简易超声方法。

Novel and Simple Ultrasonographic Methods for Estimating the Abdominal Visceral Fat Area.

作者信息

Asano Takeharu, Kubota Naoto, Koizumi Norihiro, Itani Kazunori, Mitake Tsuyoshi, Yuhashi Kazuhito, Liao Hongen, Mitsuishi Mamoru, Takeishi Shigemi, Takahashi Toshiaki, Ohnishi Shin, Sasaki Shiro, Sakuma Ichiro, Kadowaki Takashi

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Translational Systems Biology and Medicine Initiative (TSBMI), University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Endocrinol. 2017;2017:8796069. doi: 10.1155/2017/8796069. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the abdominal visceral fat area (VFA), we developed novel ultrasonographic (US) methods for estimating.

METHODS

100 male volunteers were recruited, and their VFA was calculated by two novel US methods, the triangle method and the ellipse method. The VFA calculated by these methods was compared with the VFA calculated by CT.

RESULTS

Both the VFA calculated by the triangle method ( = 0.766, < 0.001) and the ellipse method ( = 0.781, < 0.001) showed a high correlation coefficient with the VFA calculated by CT. Also, the VFA calculated by our novel methods were significantly increased in subjects with one or more metabolic risk factors than in those without any risk factors. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients obtained using the two methods were enhanced by the addition of multiple regression analysis (with the triangle method, = 0.8586, < 0.001; with the ellipse method, = 0.8642, < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The VFA calculated by the triangle or ellipse method showed a high correlation coefficient with the VFA calculated by CT. These US methods are easy to use, they involve no radiation exposure, and the measurements can be conducted frequently. We hope that our simple methods would be widely adopted for the evaluation of VFA.

摘要

目的

为评估腹部内脏脂肪面积(VFA),我们开发了新的超声(US)估算方法。

方法

招募100名男性志愿者,通过两种新的超声方法(三角形法和椭圆法)计算他们的VFA。将这些方法计算出的VFA与CT计算出的VFA进行比较。

结果

三角形法计算出的VFA(=0.766,<0.001)和椭圆法计算出的VFA(=0.781,<0.001)与CT计算出的VFA均显示出高相关系数。此外,与无任何危险因素的受试者相比,有一个或多个代谢危险因素的受试者用我们的新方法计算出的VFA显著增加。而且,通过多元回归分析,两种方法得到的相关系数均有所提高(三角形法,=0.8586,<0.001;椭圆法,=0.8642,<0.001)。

结论

三角形法或椭圆法计算出的VFA与CT计算出的VFA显示出高相关系数。这些超声方法易于使用,无辐射暴露,且可频繁进行测量。我们希望我们的简单方法能被广泛用于VFA的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe50/5585558/144800603b6d/IJE2017-8796069.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验