Black Dan A, Hsu Yu-Chieh, Sanders Seth G, Schofield Lynne Steuerle, Taylor Lowell J
Harris School, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
IZA, Bonn, Germany.
Demography. 2017 Dec;54(6):2001-2024. doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0623-x.
We examine inferences about old-age mortality that arise when researchers use survey data matched to death records. We show that even small rates of failure to match respondents can lead to substantial bias in the measurement of mortality rates at older ages. This type of measurement error is consequential for three strands in the demographic literature: (1) the deceleration in mortality rates at old ages; (2) the black-white mortality crossover; and (3) the relatively low rate of old-age mortality among Hispanics, often called the "Hispanic paradox." Using the National Longitudinal Survey of Older Men matched to death records in both the U.S. Vital Statistics system and the Social Security Death Index, we demonstrate that even small rates of missing mortality matching plausibly lead to an appearance of mortality deceleration when none exists and can generate a spurious black-white mortality crossover. We confirm these findings using data from the National Health Interview Survey matched to the U.S. Vital Statistics system, a data set known as the "gold standard" (Cowper et al. 2002) for estimating age-specific mortality. Moreover, with these data, we show that the Hispanic paradox is also plausibly explained by a similar undercount.
我们研究了研究人员使用与死亡记录相匹配的调查数据时所产生的关于老年死亡率的推断。我们表明,即使是很低的未匹配受访者比例,也可能导致老年死亡率测量中出现实质性偏差。这种测量误差在人口统计学文献的三个方面具有重要影响:(1)老年死亡率的减速;(2)黑人和白人死亡率的交叉;(3)西班牙裔人群中相对较低的老年死亡率,通常称为“西班牙裔悖论”。利用与美国生命统计系统和社会保障死亡指数中的死亡记录相匹配的美国老年男性纵向调查数据,我们证明,即使是很低的死亡率匹配缺失率,在实际上不存在死亡率减速的情况下,也可能导致出现死亡率减速的表象,并可能产生虚假的黑人和白人死亡率交叉。我们使用与美国生命统计系统相匹配的国家健康访谈调查数据(该数据集被称为估计特定年龄死亡率的“黄金标准”(考珀等人,2002年))证实了这些发现。此外,利用这些数据,我们表明,西班牙裔悖论也可能由类似的计数不足来解释。