Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
J Adv Nurs. 2018 May;74(5):1001-1015. doi: 10.1111/jan.13495. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
To analyse the psychometric properties and the utility of instruments used to measure patient comfort, physical, social, psychospiritual and/or environmental, during hospitalization.
There are no systematic reviews nor psychometric reviews of instruments used to measure comfort, which is considered an indicator of quality in health care associated with quicker discharges, increased patient satisfaction and better cost-benefit ratios for the institution.
Psychometric review.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, ProQuest Thesis&Dissertations, Google.
We limited our search to studies published between 1990-2015. The psychometric analysis was performed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), along with the Quality Criteria for Measurement Properties. The utility of the instruments was assessed according to their cost-efficiency, acceptability and educational impact. Protocol registration in PROSPERO, CRD42016036290.
Instruments reviewed showed moderate methodological quality and their utility was poorly reported. Thus, we cannot recommend any questionnaire without reservations, but the Comfort Scale, the General Comfort Questionnaire and their adaptations in adults and older patients, the Psychosocial Comfort Scale and the Incomfort des Patients de Reanimation are the most recommendable instruments to measure comfort.
The methodology of the studies should be more rigorous and authors should adequately report the utility of instruments. This review provides a strategy to select the most suitable instrument to assess patient comfort according to their psychometric properties and utility, which is crucial for nurses, clinicians, researchers and institutions.
分析用于测量住院患者舒适度的工具的心理计量学特性和实用性,这些舒适度包括身体、社会、心理精神和/或环境等方面。
目前尚无用于测量舒适度的工具的系统评价或心理计量学评价,而舒适度被认为是医疗保健质量的一个指标,与更快的出院、增加患者满意度和更好的机构成本效益比相关。
心理计量学评价。
MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Web of Knowledge、ProQuest 论文和论文集、Google。
我们将搜索范围限于 1990 年至 2015 年期间发表的研究。使用共识基础的健康状况测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)以及测量属性的质量标准进行心理计量学分析。根据成本效益、可接受性和教育影响来评估工具的实用性。方案在 PROSPERO 中注册,CRD42016036290。
所审查的工具显示出中等的方法学质量,其实用性报告较差。因此,我们不能毫无保留地推荐任何问卷,但舒适度量表、一般舒适度问卷及其在成人和老年患者中的适应性、心理社会舒适度量表和复苏患者不适量表是最值得推荐的用于测量舒适度的工具。
研究的方法学应该更加严谨,作者应该充分报告工具的实用性。本综述提供了一种策略,根据工具的心理计量学特性和实用性来选择最合适的工具来评估患者的舒适度,这对护士、临床医生、研究人员和机构来说至关重要。