• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估患者住院期间舒适度的工具:心理测量学综述。

Instruments to assess patient comfort during hospitalization: A psychometric review.

机构信息

Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Hospital de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2018 May;74(5):1001-1015. doi: 10.1111/jan.13495. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1111/jan.13495
PMID:29098701
Abstract

AIM

To analyse the psychometric properties and the utility of instruments used to measure patient comfort, physical, social, psychospiritual and/or environmental, during hospitalization.

BACKGROUND

There are no systematic reviews nor psychometric reviews of instruments used to measure comfort, which is considered an indicator of quality in health care associated with quicker discharges, increased patient satisfaction and better cost-benefit ratios for the institution.

DESIGN

Psychometric review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, ProQuest Thesis&Dissertations, Google.

REVIEW METHODS

We limited our search to studies published between 1990-2015. The psychometric analysis was performed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), along with the Quality Criteria for Measurement Properties. The utility of the instruments was assessed according to their cost-efficiency, acceptability and educational impact. Protocol registration in PROSPERO, CRD42016036290.

RESULTS

Instruments reviewed showed moderate methodological quality and their utility was poorly reported. Thus, we cannot recommend any questionnaire without reservations, but the Comfort Scale, the General Comfort Questionnaire and their adaptations in adults and older patients, the Psychosocial Comfort Scale and the Incomfort des Patients de Reanimation are the most recommendable instruments to measure comfort.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodology of the studies should be more rigorous and authors should adequately report the utility of instruments. This review provides a strategy to select the most suitable instrument to assess patient comfort according to their psychometric properties and utility, which is crucial for nurses, clinicians, researchers and institutions.

摘要

目的

分析用于测量住院患者舒适度的工具的心理计量学特性和实用性,这些舒适度包括身体、社会、心理精神和/或环境等方面。

背景

目前尚无用于测量舒适度的工具的系统评价或心理计量学评价,而舒适度被认为是医疗保健质量的一个指标,与更快的出院、增加患者满意度和更好的机构成本效益比相关。

设计

心理计量学评价。

资料来源

MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Web of Knowledge、ProQuest 论文和论文集、Google。

检索方法

我们将搜索范围限于 1990 年至 2015 年期间发表的研究。使用共识基础的健康状况测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)以及测量属性的质量标准进行心理计量学分析。根据成本效益、可接受性和教育影响来评估工具的实用性。方案在 PROSPERO 中注册,CRD42016036290。

结果

所审查的工具显示出中等的方法学质量,其实用性报告较差。因此,我们不能毫无保留地推荐任何问卷,但舒适度量表、一般舒适度问卷及其在成人和老年患者中的适应性、心理社会舒适度量表和复苏患者不适量表是最值得推荐的用于测量舒适度的工具。

结论

研究的方法学应该更加严谨,作者应该充分报告工具的实用性。本综述提供了一种策略,根据工具的心理计量学特性和实用性来选择最合适的工具来评估患者的舒适度,这对护士、临床医生、研究人员和机构来说至关重要。

相似文献

1
Instruments to assess patient comfort during hospitalization: A psychometric review.评估患者住院期间舒适度的工具:心理测量学综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 May;74(5):1001-1015. doi: 10.1111/jan.13495. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
2
Instruments to assess the patient comfort during hospitalization: a psychometric review protocol.评估住院患者舒适度的工具:心理测量学综述方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Mar;73(3):735-741. doi: 10.1111/jan.13180. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
3
Psychometric properties of instruments measuring quality and satisfaction in mental health: A systematic review.测量心理健康质量和满意度的工具的心理计量学特性:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Nov;74(11):2497-2510. doi: 10.1111/jan.13813. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
4
Instruments evaluating the self-directed learning abilities among nursing students and nurses: a systematic review of psychometric properties.评估护生和护士自主学习能力的工具:心理测量学特性的系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 25;17(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1072-3.
5
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
6
Instruments to measure patient experience of health care quality in hospitals: a systematic review protocol.测量医院医疗服务质量患者体验的工具:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 4;3:4. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-4.
7
The suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties.姑息治疗中的痛苦测量工具:心理测量特性的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct;110:103704. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103704. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
8
Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the informatics competence of nurses: A systematic review.测量护士信息学能力的工具的心理计量学特性:系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Aug;79:104070. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104070. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
9
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
10
Instruments for Measuring Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care: A Systematic Review.测量物理治疗护理满意度的工具:系统评价。
Phys Ther. 2020 Aug 31;100(9):1690-1700. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa111.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Hospice Comfort Questionnaire-Patient (HCQ-P).《临终关怀舒适问卷-患者版(HCQ-P)》中文版的改编与验证
PeerJ. 2025 Jun 10;13:e19562. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19562. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of Authentic Leadership on Nurses' Ethically Oriented Practices and Patient-Oriented Outcomes: A Multilevel Analysis.真实领导对护士的道德导向实践和以患者为导向的结果的影响:一项多层次分析。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Mar 30;2025:5336957. doi: 10.1155/jonm/5336957. eCollection 2025.
3
Development and validation of a comfort-measuring scale for elderly individuals with chronic conditions.
慢性病老年患者舒适度测量量表的研制与验证
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 4;24(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02999-w.
4
Application of Kolcaba's Comfort Theory in healthcare promoting adults' comfort: a scoping review.科卡巴舒适理论在促进成人舒适的保健护理中的应用:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 10;14(10):e077810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077810.
5
Comfort evaluation and physiological effects/autonomic nervous system response of inflatable deep pressure vest in reducing anxiety.充气式深层压力背心在减轻焦虑方面的舒适度评估及生理效应/自主神经系统反应
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 9;10(16):e36065. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36065. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
6
Effectiveness and safety of implementing an enhanced patient comfort programme for elective neurosurgical patients: a randomised controlled trial protocol.实施强化型择期神经外科患者舒适护理方案的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 18;13(4):e063534. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063534.
7
Exploration of Contributory Factors to an Unpleasant Bracing Experience of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients a Quantitative and Qualitative Research.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者不愉快支具佩戴体验的影响因素探究:一项定量与定性研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Apr 28;9(5):635. doi: 10.3390/children9050635.
8
Effectiveness of bed bath methods for skin integrity, skin cleanliness and comfort enhancement in adults: A systematic review.卧床擦浴法对成人皮肤完整性、皮肤清洁度和舒适度的影响:系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2284-2300. doi: 10.1002/nop2.836. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
9
Comfort during the bed bath-A randomised crossover trial on the effect of washing without water versus water and soap in nursing students.床上擦浴时的舒适度——一项关于护理专业学生无水擦拭与用水和肥皂擦拭效果的随机交叉试验。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Aug;30(15-16):2234-2245. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15610. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review.评估生活质量工具测量性能的工具:荟萃评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 11;10(8):e036038. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036038.