• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纸质与电子用药医嘱中危险缩写、符号及剂量标识使用情况的审核:一项多中心研究

Audit on the Use of Dangerous Abbreviations, Symbols, and Dose Designations in Paper Compared to Electronic Medication Orders: A Multicenter Study.

作者信息

Cheung Stephanie, Hoi Sannifer, Fernandes Olavo, Huh Jin, Kynicos Sara, Murphy Laura, Lowe Donna

机构信息

1 Mackenzie Health Richmond Hill, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada.

2 Vancouver Island Health Authority, Victoria, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Apr;52(4):332-337. doi: 10.1177/1060028017740140. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1177/1060028017740140
PMID:29099233
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dangerous abbreviations on the Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada's "Do Not Use" list have resulted in medication errors leading to harm. Data comparing rates of use of dangerous abbreviations in paper and electronic medication orders are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of use of dangerous abbreviations from the "Do Not Use" list, in paper and electronic medication orders. Secondary objectives include determining the proportion of patients at risk for medication errors due to dangerous abbreviations and the most commonly used dangerous abbreviations.

METHODS

One-day cross-sectional audits of medication orders were conducted at a 6-site hospital network in Toronto, Canada, between December 2013 and January 2014. Proportions of paper and electronic medication orders containing dangerous abbreviation(s) were compared using a χ test. The proportion of patients with at least 1 medication order containing dangerous abbreviation(s) and the top 5 dangerous abbreviations used were described.

RESULTS

Overall, 255 patient charts were reviewed. The proportions of paper and electronic medication orders containing dangerous abbreviation(s) were 172/714 (24.1%) and 9/2207 (0.4%), respectively ( P < 0.001). Almost one-third of patients had medication order(s) containing dangerous abbreviation(s). The proportions of patients with at least 1 medication order during the audit period containing dangerous abbreviation(s) for patients with paper only, electronic only, or a hybrid of paper and electronic medication orders were 50.5%, 5%, and 47.2%, respectively. Those most commonly used were "D/C", drug name abbreviations, "OD," "cc," and "U."

CONCLUSIONS

Electronic medication orders have significantly lower rates of dangerous abbreviation use compared to paper medication orders.

摘要

背景

加拿大安全用药实践协会“禁用”清单上的危险缩写导致了用药错误并造成伤害。比较纸质和电子用药医嘱中危险缩写使用率的数据有限。

目的

比较纸质和电子用药医嘱中加拿大安全用药实践协会“禁用”清单上危险缩写的使用率。次要目的包括确定因危险缩写而有用药错误风险的患者比例以及最常用的危险缩写。

方法

2013年12月至2014年1月期间,在加拿大多伦多一个由6家医院组成的网络中,对用药医嘱进行了为期一天的横断面审核。使用χ检验比较包含危险缩写的纸质和电子用药医嘱的比例。描述了至少有1条用药医嘱包含危险缩写的患者比例以及使用频率最高的5种危险缩写。

结果

总体而言,共审查了255份患者病历。包含危险缩写的纸质和电子用药医嘱的比例分别为172/714(24.1%)和9/2207(0.4%)(P<0.001)。近三分之一的患者有包含危险缩写的用药医嘱。在审核期间,仅使用纸质用药医嘱、仅使用电子用药医嘱或同时使用纸质和电子用药医嘱的患者中,至少有1条用药医嘱包含危险缩写的比例分别为50.5%、5%和47.2%。最常用的危险缩写是“D/C”、药品名称缩写、“OD”、“cc”和“U”。

结论

与纸质用药医嘱相比,电子用药医嘱中危险缩写的使用率显著更低。

相似文献

1
Audit on the Use of Dangerous Abbreviations, Symbols, and Dose Designations in Paper Compared to Electronic Medication Orders: A Multicenter Study.纸质与电子用药医嘱中危险缩写、符号及剂量标识使用情况的审核:一项多中心研究
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Apr;52(4):332-337. doi: 10.1177/1060028017740140. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
Prevalence of error-prone abbreviations used in medication prescribing for hospitalised patients: multi-hospital evaluation.住院患者用药医嘱中易错缩写的流行情况:多医院评估。
Intern Med J. 2012 Mar;42(3):e19-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02697.x.
3
Evaluation of a hybrid paper-electronic medication management system at a residential aged care facility.在一家老年护理机构对纸质 - 电子混合药物管理系统进行评估。
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Jun;40(3):244-250. doi: 10.1071/AH14206.
4
Dangerous abbreviations: "U" can make a difference!危险的缩写:“U”可能会造成差异!
Dynamics. 2005 Fall;16(3):11-5.
5
Educational interventions to reduce use of unsafe abbreviations.减少使用不安全缩写的教育干预措施。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jun 1;64(11):1170-3. doi: 10.2146/ajhp060173.
6
Evaluation of the quality of 'do not use' medication abbreviation audits: a key enabler to successful implementation of audit and feedback.评估“不要使用”药物缩写医嘱审核的质量:成功实施审核和反馈的关键促成因素。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):748-752. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01232-3. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
7
Effectiveness of a pharmacist-led educational intervention to reduce the use of high-risk abbreviations in an acute care setting in Saudi Arabia: a quasi-experimental study.药剂师主导的教育干预措施在沙特阿拉伯急性护理环境中减少高风险缩写使用的有效性:一项准实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 16;6(6):e011401. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011401.
8
Let go of Latin!抛开拉丁语!
Vet Hum Toxicol. 2001 Aug;43(4):235-6.
9
Medication safety issue brief. Eliminating dangerous abbreviations, acronyms and symbols.用药安全问题简报。消除危险的缩写、首字母缩略词和符号。
Hosp Health Netw. 2005 Jun;79(6):41-2.
10
The pattern of abbreviation use in prescriptions: a way forward in eliminating error-prone abbreviations and standardisation of prescriptions.处方中缩写的使用模式:消除易出错缩写及实现处方标准化的前进方向。
Curr Drug Saf. 2014 Mar;9(1):34-42. doi: 10.2174/1574886308666131223123721.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpretation and Misinterpretation of Medical Abbreviations Found in Patient Medical Records: A Cross-Sectional Survey.患者病历中医学缩写的解读与误读:一项横断面调查。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 5;15(9):e44735. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44735. eCollection 2023 Sep.