• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LAELAPS-2)多中心培训项目的结果。

Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-2).

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):344-350. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002563.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002563
PMID:29099400
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess feasibility and outcomes of a multicenter training program in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD).

BACKGROUND

Whereas expert centers have reported promising outcomes of LPD, nationwide analyses have raised concerns on its safety, especially during the learning curve. Multicenter, structured LPD training programs reporting outcomes including the first procedures are lacking. No LPD had been performed in the Netherlands before this study.

METHODS

During 2014-2016, 8 surgeons from 4 high-volume centers completed the Longitudinal Assessment and Realization of Laparoscopic Pancreatic Surgery (LAELAPS-2) training program in LPD, including detailed technique description, video training, and proctoring. In all centers, LPD was performed by 2 surgeons with extensive experience in pancreatic and laparoscopic surgery. Outcomes of all LPDs were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

In total, 114 patients underwent LPD. Median pancreatic duct diameter was 3 mm [interquartile range (IQR = 2-4)] and pancreatic texture was soft in 74% of patients. The conversion rate was 11% (n = 12), median blood loss 350 mL (IQR = 200-700), and operative time 375 minutes (IQR = 320-431). Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 34% of patients, requiring catheter drainage in 22% and re-operation in 2%. A Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complication occurred in 43% of patients. Median length of hospital stay was 15 days (IQR = 9-25). Overall, 30-day and 90-day mortality were both 3.5%. Outcomes were similar for the first and second part of procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This LPD training program was feasible and ensured acceptable outcomes during the learning curve in all centers. Future studies should determine whether such a training program is applicable in other settings and assess the added value of LPD.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)多中心培训计划的可行性和结果。

背景

虽然专家中心报告了 LPD 的良好结果,但全国性分析对其安全性提出了担忧,尤其是在学习曲线期间。缺乏报告包括第一阶段手术在内的多中心、结构化的 LPD 培训计划。在本研究之前,荷兰尚未开展 LPD。

方法

在 2014-2016 年期间,来自 4 家高容量中心的 8 名外科医生完成了 LPD 的纵向评估和实现腹腔镜胰腺手术(LAELAPS-2)培训计划,包括详细的技术描述、视频培训和监督。在所有中心,LPD 均由 2 名具有丰富胰腺和腹腔镜手术经验的外科医生进行。所有 LPD 的结果均前瞻性收集。

结果

共有 114 例患者接受了 LPD。中位胰管直径为 3mm[四分位距(IQR=2-4)],74%的患者胰脏质地柔软。转化率为 11%(n=12),中位出血量 350ml[IQR=200-700],手术时间 375 分钟[IQR=320-431]。术后 B/C 级胰瘘发生率为 34%,22%需要导管引流,2%需要再次手术。43%的患者发生了 Clavien-Dindo 分级≥3 级的并发症。中位住院时间为 15 天[IQR=9-25]。总体而言,30 天和 90 天死亡率均为 3.5%。第一部分和第二部分手术的结果相似。

结论

该 LPD 培训计划在所有中心的学习曲线期间是可行的,并确保了可接受的结果。未来的研究应确定这种培训计划是否适用于其他环境,并评估 LPD 的附加价值。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-2).腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LAELAPS-2)多中心培训项目的结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):344-350. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002563.
2
Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3).多中心机器人胰十二指肠切除术培训项目(LAELAPS-3)的结果。
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e886-e895. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004783. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
3
Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with open or laparoscopic reconstruction during the learning curve: a multicenter propensity score matched study.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术联合开腹或腹腔镜重建在学习曲线期间:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Jul;21(7):857-864. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
4
The Feasibility, Proficiency, and Mastery Learning Curves in 635 Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies Following a Multicenter Training Program: "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants".635 例机器人胰十二指肠切除术的可行性、熟练程度和掌握学习曲线:“站在巨人的肩膀上”。
Ann Surg. 2023 Dec 1;278(6):e1232-e1241. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005928. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;6(6):438-447. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
6
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors of the head of pancreas; 10 cases for a single center experience.腹腔镜胰头十二指肠切除术治疗胰头肿瘤;单中心 10 例经验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Oct;21(17):3745-3753.
7
Stepwise implementation of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Case series of a single centre's experience.腹腔镜胰腺手术的逐步实施。单中心经验的病例系列。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.037. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
8
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤(LEOPARD-2):一项多中心、患者盲法、随机对照 2/3 期试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;4(3):199-207. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30004-4. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
9
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术:单术者经验
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3783-94. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4154-5. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
10
Comparison of Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Hybrid and Totally Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy.杂交与完全腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结果比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 26;26:e924190. doi: 10.12659/MSM.924190.

引用本文的文献

1
Transatlantic differences in the use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: an international multi-registry analysis.微创胰十二指肠切除术使用情况及结局的跨大西洋差异:一项国际多登记处分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7099-7111. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11161-7. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
2
Effects of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Short-Term Surgical Outcomes and Postoperative Nutritional and Immunological Statuses: A Single-Institution Propensity Score-Matched Study.微创与开放胰十二指肠切除术对短期手术结局及术后营养和免疫状态的影响:一项单机构倾向评分匹配研究
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Aug 30;5(3):e487. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000487. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
The state of robotic open pancreatoduodenectomy.
机器人辅助开放性胰十二指肠切除术的现状
Gland Surg. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1344-1348. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-182. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
4
Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review.微创外科在局限性胰腺导管腺癌治疗中的作用:综述。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 22;18(1):85. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01825-w.
5
Robotic pancreas surgery for pancreatic cancer.用于胰腺癌的机器人胰腺手术。
Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6100-6110. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000906.
6
Effect of Laparoscopic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic or Periampullary Tumors: Three-year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤的效果:一项随机临床试验的 3 年随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2024 Apr 1;279(4):605-612. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006149. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
7
Teaching modern pancreatic surgery: close relationship between centralization, innovation, and dissemination of care.教授现代胰腺外科:集中化、创新和护理传播之间的密切关系。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad081.
8
Pancreatojejunostomy: standing on the shoulders of giants. A single centre retrospective analysis.胰肠吻合术:站在巨人的肩膀上。单中心回顾性分析。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jan;76(1):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01643-z. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
9
The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS).布雷达国际微创胰腺手术验证性欧洲指南(EGUMIPS)。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):45-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006006. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
10
Impact of Unplanned Intra-Operative Conversions on Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy.微创胰十二指肠切除术术中计划外转化对结局的影响。
World J Surg. 2023 Oct;47(10):2507-2518. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07114-1. Epub 2023 Jul 12.