• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对医生的信任、社会支持以及对新冠疫情错误信息的相信。

Trust in doctors, social support, and belief in COVID-19 misinformation.

作者信息

Horoszko Urszula A, Smith Lindsay, Murphy Amy, Taylor Bruce G, Lamuda Phoebe A, Pollack Harold A, Schneider John A, Taxman Faye S, Zhao Xiaoquan

机构信息

Department of Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

Schar School of Public Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2236. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23470-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-23470-0
PMID:40604580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12220512/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Misinformation has emerged as a major concern for public health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study conceptualizes trust in doctors and social support through the lens of social capital theory and investigates their role in public endorsement of COVID-19-related misinformation.

METHODS

Using data from a nationally representative survey (N = 6,515), a series of logistic regression models were used to estimate relationships between misinformation endorsement and trust in doctors and social support from interpersonal and communal sources. Moderation analyses explored differences in these relationships among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic respondents.

RESULTS

In the full sample analysis, trust in doctors and social support from both sources were negatively associated with misinformation endorsement. This pattern did not consistently hold across the three subgroups in moderation analyses. Trust in doctors was negatively associated with misinformation endorsement in most cases, whereas social support exhibited varied associations depending on its source and respondents' race and ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm that trust in doctors is an important protective factor against COVID-19 misinformation. The role of social support, however, is more nuanced and warrants continued research that considers both support sources and the racial and ethnic background of the communities involved.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,错误信息已成为公共卫生领域的一个主要担忧。我们的研究从社会资本理论的角度对医患信任和社会支持进行了概念化,并调查了它们在公众认可新冠相关错误信息方面所起的作用。

方法

利用一项全国代表性调查(N = 6515)的数据,我们使用了一系列逻辑回归模型来估计错误信息认可与医患信任以及来自人际和社区来源的社会支持之间的关系。调节分析探讨了非西班牙裔白人、非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔受访者在这些关系上的差异。

结果

在全样本分析中,医患信任和来自这两个来源的社会支持均与错误信息认可呈负相关。在调节分析中,这种模式在三个亚组中并不一致。在大多数情况下,医患信任与错误信息认可呈负相关,而社会支持的关联则因支持来源以及受访者的种族和民族而异。

结论

这些发现证实,医患信任是防范新冠错误信息的一个重要保护因素。然而,社会支持的作用更为微妙,需要持续开展研究,同时考虑支持来源以及相关社区的种族和民族背景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8d/12220512/1dd1b85ff4de/12889_2025_23470_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8d/12220512/1dd1b85ff4de/12889_2025_23470_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8d/12220512/1dd1b85ff4de/12889_2025_23470_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust in doctors, social support, and belief in COVID-19 misinformation.对医生的信任、社会支持以及对新冠疫情错误信息的相信。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2236. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23470-0.
2
Measurement, Characterization, and Mapping of COVID-19 Misinformation in Spain: Cross-Sectional Study.西班牙新冠疫情虚假信息的测量、特征描述与映射:横断面研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jun 16;5:e69945. doi: 10.2196/69945.
3
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.
4
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
6
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
7
Are There Racial and Ethnic Variations in Patient Attitudes Toward Hip and Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review.患者对骨关节炎髋关节和膝关节置换手术的态度是否存在种族和民族差异?系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1417-1424. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003021. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
8
Racial and ethnic disparities in mental health among breast cancer patients and survivors in the United States.美国乳腺癌患者及幸存者心理健康方面的种族和民族差异。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 14. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14391.
9
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10
Social Isolation and Subjective Well-Being Among Older Adults: A Longitudinal Examination by Race/Ethnicity and Gender.老年人的社会隔离与主观幸福感:基于种族/民族和性别的纵向研究
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 May 8;80(6). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf066.

本文引用的文献

1
A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior.生物武器还是骗局?关于冠状病毒病(COVID-19)爆发和大流行行为的不同阴谋论之间的联系。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020 Nov;11(8):1110-1118. doi: 10.1177/1948550620934692.
2
Endorsement of COVID-19 misinformation among criminal legal involved individuals in the United States: Prevalence and relationship with information sources.美国刑事法律涉案人员对新冠错误信息的认可:流行情况及其与信息来源的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0296752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296752. eCollection 2024.
3
Polarization, the Pandemic, and Public Trust in Health System Actors.
极化现象、大流行病与公众对卫生系统行为体的信任。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Jun 1;49(3):375-401. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11075562.
4
The role of perceived minority-group status in the conspiracy beliefs of factual majority groups.被感知的少数群体地位在实际多数群体的阴谋论信念中的作用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Oct 18;10(10):221036. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221036. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
The "Loci" of Misinformation and Its Correction in Peer- and Expert-Led Online Communities for Mental Health: Content Analysis.错误信息的“病灶”及其在心理健康同行和专家主导的在线社区中的纠正:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 18;25:e44656. doi: 10.2196/44656.
6
Openness to change among COVID misinformation endorsers: Associations with social demographic characteristics and information source usage.支持新冠错误信息者的变革开放性:与社会人口特征和信息来源使用的关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Oct;335:116233. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116233. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
7
Exploration of the nonlinear relationship between social support and the establishment of long-term doctor-patient relationships: An empirical analysis based on virtual doctor teams.探讨社会支持与建立长期医患关系之间的非线性关系:基于虚拟医生团队的实证分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Oct;178:105198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105198. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
8
Covid-19: did higher trust societies fare better?新冠疫情:信任度较高的社会表现更好吗?
Discov Soc Sci Health. 2023;3(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s44155-023-00035-3. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
Unlocking infodemics and mysteries in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Nexus of conspiracy beliefs, digital informational support, psychological Well-being, and religious fatalism.解锁 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫中的信息疫情和谜团:阴谋信仰、数字信息支持、心理健康和宗教宿命论的关系。
Vaccine. 2023 Mar 3;41(10):1703-1715. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.047. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
10
Characterizing the dissemination of misinformation on social media in health emergencies: An empirical study based on COVID-19.在卫生突发事件中刻画社交媒体上错误信息的传播情况:一项基于新冠肺炎的实证研究。
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Jul;58(4):102554. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102554. Epub 2021 Mar 3.