Yang Jin, Dehom Salem, Sanders Stephanie, Murry Thomas, Krishna Priya, Crawley Brianna K
Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Loma Linda University School of Public Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Jan-Feb;39(1):50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
To determine if an anti-reflux induction program relieves laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms more effectively than medication and behavioral changes alone.
Retrospective study.
Tertiary care academic center.
A database was populated with patients treated for LPR. Patients were included in the study group if they completed a two-week anti-reflux program (diet, alkaline water, medications, behavioral modifications). Patients were included in the control group if they completed anti-reflux medications and behavioral modifications only. Patients completed the voice handicap index (VHI), reflux symptom index (RSI), cough severity index (CSI), dyspnea index (DI) and eating assessment tool (EAT-10) surveys and underwent laryngoscopy for examination and reflux finding score (RFS) quantification.
Of 105 study group patients, 96 (91%) reported subjective improvement in their LPR symptoms after an average 32-day first follow-up and their RSI and CSI scores improved significantly. No significant differences were found in VHI, DI, or EAT-10 scores. Fifteen study patients who had previously failed adequate high-dose medication trials reported improvement and their CSI and EAT-10 scores improved significantly. Ninety-five percent of patients with a chief complaint of cough reported improvement and their CSI scores improved significantly from 12.3 to 8.2. Among 81 controls, only 39 (48%) patients reported improvement after an average 62-day first follow-up. Their RSI scores did not significantly change.
The anti-reflux program yielded rapid and substantial results for a large cohort of patients with LPR. It compared favorably with medication and behavioral modification alone. It was effective in improving cough and treating patients who had previously failed medications alone.
确定抗反流诱导方案是否比单独使用药物和行为改变更有效地缓解喉咽反流(LPR)症状。
回顾性研究。
三级医疗学术中心。
建立一个接受LPR治疗患者的数据库。如果患者完成了为期两周的抗反流方案(饮食、碱性水、药物、行为改变),则纳入研究组。如果患者仅完成了抗反流药物治疗和行为改变,则纳入对照组。患者完成嗓音障碍指数(VHI)、反流症状指数(RSI)、咳嗽严重程度指数(CSI)、呼吸困难指数(DI)和进食评估工具(EAT-10)调查,并接受喉镜检查以进行检查和反流发现评分(RFS)量化。
在105名研究组患者中,96名(91%)在平均32天的首次随访后报告LPR症状有主观改善,其RSI和CSI评分显著改善。VHI、DI或EAT-10评分未发现显著差异。15名先前足量高剂量药物试验失败的研究患者报告有改善,其CSI和EAT-10评分显著改善。以咳嗽为主诉的患者中有95%报告有改善,其CSI评分从12.3显著改善至8.2。在81名对照组患者中,平均62天的首次随访后,只有39名(48%)患者报告有改善。他们的RSI评分没有显著变化。
抗反流方案对大量LPR患者产生了快速且显著的效果。与单独使用药物和行为改变相比效果良好。它在改善咳嗽方面有效,并且对先前单独使用药物治疗失败的患者也有疗效。