Suppr超能文献

中国西南云南森林生态系统的碳交换及其对温度和降水的响应。

Carbon exchanges and their responses to temperature and precipitation in forest ecosystems in Yunnan, Southwest China.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Yunnan 666303, China; Global Change Ecology Group, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun 666303, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Yunnan 666303, China; Global Change Ecology Group, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun 666303, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar;616-617:824-840. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.239.

Abstract

Forest ecosystems play an increasingly important role in the global carbon cycle. However, knowledge on carbon exchanges, their spatio-temporal patterns, and the extent of the key controls that affect carbon fluxes is lacking. In this study, we employed 29-site-years of eddy covariance data to observe the state, spatio-temporal variations and climate sensitivity of carbon fluxes (gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (R), and net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE)) in four representative forest ecosystems in Yunnan. We found that 1) all four forest ecosystems were carbon sinks (the average NEE was -3.40tChayr); 2) contrasting seasonality of the NEE among the ecosystems with a carbon sink mainly during the wet season in the Yuanjiang savanna ecosystem (YJ) but during the dry season in the Xishuangbanna tropical rainforest ecosystem (XSBN), besides an equivalent NEE uptake was observed during the wet/dry season in the Ailaoshan subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest ecosystem (ALS) and Lijiang subalpine coniferous forest ecosystem (LJ); 3) as the GPP increased, the net ecosystem production (NEP) first increased and then decreased when the GPP>17.5tChayr; 4) the precipitation determines the carbon sinks in the savanna ecosystem (e.g., YJ), while temperature did so in the tropical forest ecosystem (e.g., XSBN); 5) overall, under the circumstances of warming and decreased precipitation, the carbon sink might decrease in the YJ but maybe increase in the ALS and LJ, while future strength of the sink in the XSBN is somewhat uncertain. However, based on the redundancy analysis, the temperature and precipitation combined together explained 39.7%, 32.2%, 25.3%, and 29.6% of the variations in the NEE in the YJ, XSBN, ALS and LJ, respectively, which indicates that considerable changes in the NEE could not be explained by variations in the temperature and precipitation. Therefore, the effects of other factors (e.g., CO concentration, N/P deposition, aerosol and other variables) on the NEE still require extensive research and need to be considered seriously in carbon-cycle-models.

摘要

森林生态系统在全球碳循环中发挥着越来越重要的作用。然而,人们对碳交换及其时空格局以及影响碳通量的关键控制因素的了解还很缺乏。在这项研究中,我们利用 29 个站点年的涡度相关数据,观察了云南四个代表性森林生态系统中碳通量(总初级生产力(GPP)、生态系统呼吸(R)和净生态系统碳交换(NEE))的状态、时空变化和气候敏感性。我们发现:1)四个森林生态系统均为碳汇(平均 NEE 为-3.40tChayr);2)四个生态系统的 NEE 季节变化差异较大,元江稀树草原生态系统(YJ)的碳汇主要在雨季,而西双版纳热带雨林生态系统(XSBN)的碳汇主要在旱季,哀牢山亚热带常绿阔叶林生态系统(ALS)和丽江亚高山针叶林生态系统(LJ)的干湿季 NEE 吸收相当;3)随着 GPP 的增加,当 GPP>17.5tChayr 时,NEP 先增加后减少;4)降水决定了稀树草原生态系统(如 YJ)的碳汇,而温度则决定了热带森林生态系统(如 XSBN)的碳汇;5)总的来说,在变暖和降水减少的情况下,YJ 的碳汇可能会减少,而 ALS 和 LJ 的碳汇可能会增加,而 XSBN 的碳汇未来的强度则有些不确定。然而,基于冗余分析,温度和降水共同解释了 YJ、XSBN、ALS 和 LJ 中 NEE 变化的 39.7%、32.2%、25.3%和 29.6%,这表明温度和降水的变化并不能完全解释 NEE 的变化。因此,其他因素(如 CO 浓度、N/P 沉积、气溶胶和其他变量)对 NEE 的影响仍需要广泛的研究,并需要在碳循环模型中认真考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验