Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e017932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017932.
Intra-hospital transportation (IHT) might compromise patient safety because of different care settings and higher demand on the human operation. Reports regarding the incidence of IHT-related patient safety events and human failures remain limited.
To perform a retrospective analysis of IHT-related events, human failures and unsafe acts.
A hospital-wide process for the IHT and database from the incident reporting system in a medical centre in Taiwan.
All eligible IHT-related patient safety events between January 2010 to December 2015 were included.
Incidence rate of IHT-related patient safety events, human failure modes, and types of unsafe acts.
There were 206 patient safety events in 2 009 013 IHT sessions (102.5 per 1 000 000 sessions). Most events (n=148, 71.8%) did not involve patient harm, and process events (n=146, 70.9%) were most common. Events at the location of arrival (n=101, 49.0%) were most frequent; this location accounted for 61.0% and 44.2% of events with patient harm and those without harm, respectively (p<0.001). Of the events with human failures (n=186), the most common related process step was the preparation of the transportation team (n=91, 48.9%). Contributing unsafe acts included perceptual errors (n=14, 7.5%), decision errors (n=56, 30.1%), skill-based errors (n=48, 25.8%), and non-compliance (n=68, 36.6%). Multivariate analysis showed that human failure found in the arrival and hand-off sub-process (OR 4.84, p<0.001) was associated with increased patient harm, whereas the presence of omission (OR 0.12, p<0.001) was associated with less patient harm.
This study shows a need to reduce human failures to prevent patient harm during intra-hospital transportation. We suggest that the transportation team pay specific attention to the sub-process at the location of arrival and prevent errors other than omissions. Long-term monitoring of IHT-related events is also warranted.
院内转运(IHT)可能会危及患者安全,因为它涉及不同的护理环境和更高的人力操作需求。关于与 IHT 相关的患者安全事件和人为失误的报告仍然有限。
对与 IHT 相关的事件、人为失误和不安全行为进行回顾性分析。
这是一项来自台湾一家医疗中心的事件报告系统的医院范围内的 IHT 流程和数据库研究。
纳入 2010 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间所有符合条件的与 IHT 相关的患者安全事件。
IHT 相关患者安全事件发生率、人为失误模式和不安全行为类型。
在 2009013 次 IHT 中发生了 206 次患者安全事件(每 1000000 次 102.5 次)。大多数事件(n=148,71.8%)未造成患者伤害,以流程事件(n=146,70.9%)最常见。到达地点的事件(n=101,49.0%)最常见;在造成患者伤害和未造成伤害的事件中,到达地点分别占 61.0%和 44.2%(p<0.001)。在有人为失误的事件中(n=186),最常见的相关处理步骤是转运团队的准备(n=91,48.9%)。造成的不安全行为包括感知错误(n=14,7.5%)、决策错误(n=56,30.1%)、技能错误(n=48,25.8%)和违规行为(n=68,36.6%)。多变量分析显示,在到达和交接子过程中发现的人为失误(OR 4.84,p<0.001)与患者伤害增加相关,而遗漏(OR 0.12,p<0.001)与患者伤害减少相关。
本研究表明,需要减少人为失误以防止院内转运期间发生患者伤害。我们建议转运团队特别注意到达地点的子过程,并防止出现除遗漏以外的错误。还需要对与 IHT 相关的事件进行长期监测。