• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期病症问卷(LTCQ):在英格兰的初级保健患者和社会护理接受者中进行的初始验证调查。

Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ): initial validation survey among primary care patients and social care recipients in England.

机构信息

Health Services Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e019235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019235.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019235
PMID:29101153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5695378/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to validate a new generic patient-reported outcome measure, the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ), among a diverse sample of health and social care users in England.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional validation survey. Data were collected through postal surveys (February 2016-January 2017). The sample included a healthcare cohort of patients recruited through primary care practices, and a social care cohort recruited through local government bodies that provide social care services.

PARTICIPANTS

1211 participants (24% confirmed social care recipients) took part in the study. Healthcare participants were recruited on the basis of having one of 11 specified long-term conditions (LTCs), and social care participants were recruited on the basis of receiving social care support for at least one LTC. The sample exhibited high multimorbidity, with 93% reporting two or more LTCs and 43% reporting a mental health condition.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The LTCQ's construct validity was tested with reference to the EQ-5D (5-level version), the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale, an Activities of Daily Living scale and the Bayliss burden of morbidity scale.

RESULTS

Low levels of missing data for each item indicate acceptability of the LTCQ across the sample. The LTCQ exhibits high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.95) across the scale's 20 items and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.94, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.95). Associations between the LTCQ and all reference measures were moderate to strong and in the expected directions, indicating convergent construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence for the reliability and validity of the LTCQ, which has potential for use in both health and social care settings. The LTCQ could meet a need for holistic outcome measurement that goes beyond symptoms and physical function, complementing existing measures to capture fully what it means to live well with LTCs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证一种新的通用患者报告结局测量工具——长期疾病问卷(LTCQ)在英格兰不同健康和社会照护使用者样本中的有效性。

设计

横断面验证调查。数据通过邮寄调查(2016 年 2 月至 2017 年 1 月)收集。样本包括通过初级保健诊所招募的医疗保健队列和通过提供社会照护服务的地方政府机构招募的社会照护队列。

参与者

1211 名参与者(24%为确认的社会照护受助人)参与了研究。医疗保健参与者是根据以下 11 种特定的长期疾病(LTCs)之一招募的,社会照护参与者是根据至少一种 LTC 接受社会照护支持招募的。该样本表现出高度的多种合并症,93%的人报告有两种或两种以上的 LTCs,43%的人报告有心理健康状况。

结果

LTCQ 的结构有效性通过与 EQ-5D(5 级版本)、慢性疾病管理自我效能感量表、日常生活活动量表和 Bayliss 发病负担量表进行比较来测试。

结论

该研究提供了 LTCQ 的可靠性和有效性证据,该问卷在健康和社会照护环境中都具有应用潜力。LTCQ 在整个量表的 20 个项目中具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α=0.95)和极好的重测信度(组内相关系数=0.94,95%CI 0.93 至 0.95)。LTCQ 与所有参考测量之间的关联为中度至高度,且方向与预期一致,表明具有收敛结构有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb5/5695378/41b85e73e144/bmjopen-2017-019235f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb5/5695378/9af7a8c19e38/bmjopen-2017-019235f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb5/5695378/41b85e73e144/bmjopen-2017-019235f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb5/5695378/9af7a8c19e38/bmjopen-2017-019235f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb5/5695378/41b85e73e144/bmjopen-2017-019235f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ): initial validation survey among primary care patients and social care recipients in England.长期病症问卷(LTCQ):在英格兰的初级保健患者和社会护理接受者中进行的初始验证调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e019235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019235.
2
Rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8).长期病症问卷(LTCQ)的 Rasch 分析及短式问卷(LTCQ-8)的开发。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Nov 30;18(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01626-3.
3
Use of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ) for monitoring health-related quality of life in people affected by cognitive impairment including dementia: pilot study in UK memory clinic services.使用长期疾病问卷(LTCQ)监测认知障碍(包括痴呆症)患者的健康相关生活质量:英国记忆诊所服务的初步研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1641-1652. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02762-z. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
4
Assessing the Validity of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ) in Women During Pregnancy and the First Year Following Birth.评估长期健康状况问卷(LTCQ)在孕期及产后第一年女性中的有效性。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Oct 19;13:221-228. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S376070. eCollection 2022.
5
Self-efficacy and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study of primary care patients with multi-morbidity.自我效能感和健康相关生活质量:一项对患有多种疾病的初级保健患者的横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 14;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1103-3.
6
Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England.成人社会护理结果自填式工具包(ASCOT-SCT4)在英格兰患有长期身体、感官和心理健康问题的成年人中的效度及重测信度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 18;15(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0739-0.
7
Estimating EQ-5D utilities based on the Short-Form Long Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ-8).基于短期长期状况调查问卷(LTCQ-8)来估算 EQ-5D 效用值。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Aug 14;18(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01506-w.
8
Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers' quality of life.在提供支持的同时生活得好:用于评估非正式照护者生活质量的 LTCQ-Carer 的验证。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Dec;32(12):3507-3520. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03485-z. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
9
Development and validation of the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ).多重疾病治疗负担问卷(MTBQ)的开发与验证
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 12;8(4):e019413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019413.
10
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring treatment burden related to general practice in patients with multimorbidity: development and validation of a PROM.测量合并症患者与全科医疗相关的治疗负担:一种患者报告结局量表的开发与验证
Fam Med Community Health. 2025 Aug 17;13(3):e003378. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2025-003378.
2
What Are the Important Health and Well-Being Outcome Dimensions for Parent Carers of Disabled Children? A Qualitative Study.残疾儿童家长照顾者的重要健康和幸福结果维度有哪些?一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70358. doi: 10.1111/hex.70358.
3
Validation of the Arabic Version of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ): A Study of Factor and Rasch Analyses.

本文引用的文献

1
Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England.重视与健康相关的生活质量:英国的EQ-5D-5L价值集。
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1002/hec.3564. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
2
Measuring what matters to patients.衡量对患者重要的事项。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 20;356:j816. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j816.
3
Why Health and Social Care Support for People with Long-Term Conditions Should be Oriented Towards Enabling Them to Live Well.为何针对慢性病患者的健康与社会护理支持应旨在帮助他们过上美好生活。
长期病症调查问卷(LTCQ)阿拉伯语版本的验证:一项因素分析和拉施分析研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;13(13):1485. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131485.
4
Psychometric properties, and cultural appropriateness, of patient reported outcome measures for use in primary healthcare: a scoping review.用于初级医疗保健的患者报告结局指标的心理测量特性及文化适宜性:一项范围综述
Qual Life Res. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03956-5.
5
Application of the PAPERS Grading Criteria Within a Rapid Evidence Review to Determine the Psychometric and Pragmatic Properties of Patient Empowerment Tools.在快速证据审查中应用PAPERS分级标准以确定患者赋权工具的心理测量和实用特性。
J Patient Exp. 2024 Aug 21;11:23743735241272191. doi: 10.1177/23743735241272191. eCollection 2024.
6
PEER CONNECT: a pragmatic feasibility randomised controlled trial of peer coaching for adults with long-term conditions.同行连线:一项针对长期患病成年人的同伴指导的实用可行性随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 19;14(8):e087020. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087020.
7
Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers' quality of life.在提供支持的同时生活得好:用于评估非正式照护者生活质量的 LTCQ-Carer 的验证。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Dec;32(12):3507-3520. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03485-z. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
8
Development and testing of the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire.中文版本的长期疾病问卷的信度和效度的开发与测试。
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jun 25;52(3):371-378. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0029.
9
First validation study of the living with long term conditions scale (LwLTCs) among English-speaking population living with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者中使用长期病况生活量表(LwLTCs)的首次验证研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jul 10;21(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02154-6.
10
Assessing the Validity of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ) in Women During Pregnancy and the First Year Following Birth.评估长期健康状况问卷(LTCQ)在孕期及产后第一年女性中的有效性。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Oct 19;13:221-228. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S376070. eCollection 2022.
Health Care Anal. 2018 Mar;26(1):48-65. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0335-1.
4
Refinement of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ): patient and expert stakeholder opinion.长期病症调查问卷(LTCQ)的完善:患者及专家利益相关者的意见
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Nov 16;7:183-193. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S116987. eCollection 2016.
5
The Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire: conceptual framework and item development.长期病症调查问卷:概念框架与项目开发
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Aug 30;7:109-25. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S104552. eCollection 2016.
6
We need to talk about purpose: a critical interpretive synthesis of health and social care professionals' approaches to self-management support for people with long-term conditions.我们需要探讨目的:对健康与社会护理专业人员为长期疾病患者提供自我管理支持的方法进行批判性诠释性综合分析。
Health Expect. 2017 Apr;20(2):243-259. doi: 10.1111/hex.12453. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
7
A qualitative examination of the content validity of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with type 2 diabetes.对2型糖尿病患者中EQ-5D-5L内容效度的定性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Dec 1;13:192. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0373-7.
8
Perspectives from health, social care and policy stakeholders on the value of a single self-report outcome measure across long-term conditions: a qualitative study.健康、社会护理及政策利益相关者对单一自我报告结局指标在长期病症中的价值的看法:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2015 May 19;5(5):e006986. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006986.
9
Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples.运用经典测试理论、项目反应理论和拉施测量理论评估患者报告的结局指标:实例比较
Value Health. 2015 Jan;18(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.005.
10
Common patterns of morbidity and multi-morbidity and their impact on health-related quality of life: evidence from a national survey.发病率和多重发病率的常见模式及其对健康相关生活质量的影响:一项全国性调查的证据
Qual Life Res. 2015 Apr;24(4):909-18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0820-7. Epub 2014 Oct 26.