• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期病症调查问卷(LTCQ)阿拉伯语版本的验证:一项因素分析和拉施分析研究

Validation of the Arabic Version of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ): A Study of Factor and Rasch Analyses.

作者信息

Al-Qerem Walid, Abdo Salwa, Jarab Anan, Hammad Alaa, Eberhardt Judith, Al-Asmari Fawaz, Al-Sa'di Lujain, Al-Shehadeh Razan, Khasim Dana, Zumot Ruba, Khalil Sarah, Aloshebe Ghazal, Aljazazi Jude

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman 11733, Jordan.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;13(13):1485. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131485.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare13131485
PMID:40648510
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12249337/
Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential for capturing the lived experiences of individuals managing chronic diseases. However, few PROMs have been culturally adapted and validated for Arabic-speaking populations. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ) for use among Arabic-speaking adults living with chronic diseases in Jordan. Following forward-backward translation and an expert review, a cross-sectional survey of 1057 adults with chronic illnesses was conducted. The psychometric evaluation involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) and Rasch modelling. While the original LTCQ assumed a unidimensional structure, EFA and CFA supported a two-factor solution: Empowerment and Functional Wellbeing, and Health-Related Psychosocial Distress. The Rasch analysis confirmed that the item response thresholds were ordered, with good item targeting, and no differential item functioning (DIF) by gender. The removal of one poorly performing item resulted in a refined 19-item scale with strong reliability and validity. The Arabic LTCQ demonstrated robust psychometric properties and cultural relevance, supporting its use in clinical care, research, and policy initiatives. Future work should examine longitudinal responsiveness and further validate the tool across diverse Arabic-speaking populations.

摘要

患者报告结局测量(PROMs)对于了解慢性病患者的实际生活体验至关重要。然而,很少有PROMs针对讲阿拉伯语的人群进行文化调适和验证。本研究旨在翻译、进行文化调适并验证长期病症问卷(LTCQ),以供约旦患有慢性病的讲阿拉伯语成年人使用。经过前后向翻译和专家评审后,对1057名慢性病成年人进行了横断面调查。心理测量学评估包括探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA和CFA)以及拉施模型分析。虽然原始的LTCQ假定为单维结构,但EFA和CFA支持两因素解决方案:赋权与功能幸福感,以及与健康相关的心理社会困扰。拉施分析证实,项目反应阈值是有序的,项目针对性良好,且不存在按性别区分的项目功能差异(DIF)。删除一个表现不佳的项目后,得到了一个经过优化的19项量表,具有很强的信度和效度。阿拉伯语版LTCQ表现出稳健的心理测量学特性和文化相关性,支持其在临床护理、研究和政策举措中的应用。未来的工作应考察纵向反应性,并在不同的讲阿拉伯语人群中进一步验证该工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8267/12249337/e5f1b0a9928c/healthcare-13-01485-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8267/12249337/c36cf9426afe/healthcare-13-01485-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8267/12249337/e5f1b0a9928c/healthcare-13-01485-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8267/12249337/c36cf9426afe/healthcare-13-01485-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8267/12249337/e5f1b0a9928c/healthcare-13-01485-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Arabic Version of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ): A Study of Factor and Rasch Analyses.长期病症调查问卷(LTCQ)阿拉伯语版本的验证:一项因素分析和拉施分析研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;13(13):1485. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131485.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
4
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
6
Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Arabic Version of the Eating Disorders After Bariatric Surgery Questionnaire (EDABS‑Q‑Arabic18).减重手术后饮食失调问卷阿拉伯语版(EDABS-Q-Arabic18)的翻译及心理测量学评估
Obes Surg. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07910-9.
7
Psychometric validation and cultural adaptation of the family-centered care Questionnaire-Revised for use among nurses in Saudi Arabia.以家庭为中心的护理修订问卷在沙特阿拉伯护士中使用的心理测量学验证及文化调适
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 7;24(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03537-4.
8
Validation of the uncertainty stress scale-high-risk pregnancy - Chinese brief version: Rasch analysis.不确定性应激量表-高危妊娠中文版的验证:拉施分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07078-7.
9
Mental health literacy among Jordanian nurses: a cross-sectional study and scale validation.约旦护士的心理健康素养:一项横断面研究及量表验证
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):750. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03278-4.
10
Reliability and validity of the European Portuguese version of the ABILHAND questionnaire in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis.欧洲葡萄牙语版ABILHAND问卷在系统性硬化症患者中的信度和效度
ARP Rheumatol. 2025 Apr-Jun;4(2):123-137.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity, reliability, and feasibility of EQ-5D-3L, VAS, and time trade-off among Jordanians.EQ-5D-3L、视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及时间权衡法在约旦人群中的效度、信度和可行性。
J Healthc Qual Res. 2025 Jan-Feb;40(1):29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
2
Development of the Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) conceptual framework to monitor and improve the performance of primary care for people living with chronic conditions.患者报告指标调查(PaRIS)概念框架的开发,用于监测和改善慢性病患者的初级保健服务绩效。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jul 18;34(8):529-536. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017301.
3
Burden of disease scenarios for 204 countries and territories, 2022-2050: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.
204 个国家和地区 2022-2050 年疾病负担情景:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的预测分析。
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):2204-2256. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00685-8.
4
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues.患者报告结局测量(PROMs):通用和特定疾病测量工具的综述,以及对趋势和问题的讨论。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1015-1024. doi: 10.1111/hex.13254. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
Use of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ) for monitoring health-related quality of life in people affected by cognitive impairment including dementia: pilot study in UK memory clinic services.使用长期疾病问卷(LTCQ)监测认知障碍(包括痴呆症)患者的健康相关生活质量:英国记忆诊所服务的初步研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1641-1652. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02762-z. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Chi-square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis.验证性因素分析中模型拟合的卡方检验。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Sep;76(9):2209-2211. doi: 10.1111/jan.14399. Epub 2020 May 7.
7
The Role of Knowledge and Risk Beliefs in Adolescent E-Cigarette Use: A Pilot Study.知识和风险信念在青少年电子烟使用中的作用:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 23;15(4):830. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040830.
8
Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire (LTCQ): initial validation survey among primary care patients and social care recipients in England.长期病症问卷(LTCQ):在英格兰的初级保健患者和社会护理接受者中进行的初始验证调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e019235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019235.
9
Living well with chronic disease for those older adults living in the community.对于那些居住在社区中的老年人而言,与慢性病和谐共处。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 May;29(5):835-843. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216002398. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
10
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.