Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Department of Philosophy, King's College London, London, UK.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1770-1783. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1399-0.
In many everyday activities, individuals have a common interest in coordinating their actions. Orthodox game theory cannot explain such intuitively obvious forms of coordination as the selection of an outcome that is best for all in a common-interest game. Theories of team reasoning provide a convincing solution by proposing that people are sometimes motivated to maximize the collective payoff of a group and that they adopt a distinctive mode of reasoning from preferences to decisions. This also offers a compelling explanation of cooperation in social dilemmas. A review of team reasoning and related theories suggests how team reasoning could be incorporated into psychological theories of group identification and social value orientation theory to provide a deeper understanding of these phenomena.
在许多日常活动中,个体对于协调他们的行动有着共同的兴趣。正统的博弈论无法解释一些直观明显的协调形式,例如在共同利益博弈中选择对所有人都最好的结果。团队推理理论通过提出人们有时会受到激励去最大化一个群体的集体收益,并采用一种从偏好到决策的独特推理模式,为这些协调形式提供了一个令人信服的解决方案。这也为社会困境中的合作提供了一个强有力的解释。对团队推理和相关理论的回顾表明,团队推理如何可以被纳入群体认同的心理学理论和社会价值取向理论,以更深入地理解这些现象。