Suppr超能文献

团队推理——蜈蚣博弈中的合作实验证据。

Team reasoning-Experimental evidence on cooperation from centipede games.

机构信息

Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, University of Passau, Passau, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0206666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206666. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Previous laboratory studies on the centipede game have found that subjects exhibit surprisingly high levels of cooperation. Across disciplines, it has recently been highlighted that these high levels of cooperation might be explained by "team reasoning", the willingness to think as a team rather than as an individual. We run an experiment with a standard centipede game as a baseline. In two treatments, we seek to induce team reasoning by making a joint goal salient. First, we implement a probabilistic variant of the centipede game that makes it easy to identify a joint goal. Second, we frame the game as a situation where a team of two soccer players attempts to score a goal. This frame increases the salience even more. Compared to the baseline, our treatments induce higher levels of cooperation. In a second experiment, we obtain similar evidence in a more natural environment-a beer garden during the 2014 FIFA Soccer World Cup. Our study contributes to understanding how a salient goal can support cooperation.

摘要

先前关于蜈蚣博弈的实验室研究发现,参与者表现出了惊人的高水平合作。最近跨学科研究强调,这种高水平的合作可以用“团队推理”来解释,即愿意像团队而不是个人那样思考。我们进行了一项标准蜈蚣博弈实验作为基准。在两种处理方式中,我们通过突出共同目标来诱导团队推理。首先,我们实施了蜈蚣博弈的概率变体,使得很容易确定共同目标。其次,我们将游戏框定为两名足球运动员组成的团队试图进球的情况。这种框架进一步提高了共同目标的显著性。与基准相比,我们的处理方式诱导出了更高水平的合作。在第二个实验中,我们在更自然的环境中——2014 年国际足联世界杯期间的啤酒花园——获得了类似的证据。我们的研究有助于理解显著的目标如何支持合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a57/6261539/f76e7fb9f948/pone.0206666.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验