Ungaro Federica, Rubbino Federica, Danese Silvio, D'Alessio Silvia
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.
Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Immunopathology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IBD Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Front Immunol. 2017 Oct 23;8:1331. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01331. eCollection 2017.
In the last few decades, the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in genetically predisposed subjects susceptible to specific environmental factors has been attributed to disturbance of both the immune and non-immune system and/or to the imbalanced interactions with microbes. However, increasing evidences support the idea that defects in pro-resolving pathways might strongly contribute to IBD onset. The resolution of inflammation is now recognized as a dynamic event coordinated by specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (LMs), which dampen inflammation-sustaining events, such as angiogenesis, release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, clearance of apoptotic cells, and microorganisms. Among these pro-resolving molecules, those derived from essential polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have been shown to induce favorable effects on a plethora of human inflammatory disorders, including IBD. Here, we offer a summary of mechanisms involving both cellular and molecular components of the immune response and underlying the anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving properties of PUFAs and their derivatives in the gut, focusing on both ω-3 and ω-6 LMs. These fatty acids may influence IBD progression by: reducing neutrophil transmigration across the intestinal vasculature and the epithelium, preventing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the up-regulation of adhesion molecules, and finally by promoting the production of other pro-resolving molecules. We also discuss the numerous attempts in using pro-resolving PUFAs to ameliorate intestinal inflammation, both in patients with IBD and mouse models. Although their effects in reducing inflammation is incontestable, results from previous works describing the effects of PUFA administration to prevent or treat IBD are controversial. Therefore, more efforts are needed not only to identify and explain the physiological functions of PUFAs in the gut, but also to unveil novel biosynthetic pathways of these pro-resolving LMs that may be dysregulated in these gut-related disorders. We suppose that either PUFAs or new medications specifically promoting resolution-regulating mediators and pathways will be much better tolerated by patients with IBD, with the advantage of avoiding immune suppression.
在过去几十年中,遗传易感性个体在特定环境因素作用下发生炎症性肠病(IBD)的发病机制被认为是免疫和非免疫系统紊乱及/或与微生物的相互作用失衡所致。然而,越来越多的证据支持这样一种观点,即促消退途径的缺陷可能在很大程度上导致IBD的发病。炎症的消退现在被认为是一个由专门的促消退脂质介质(LMs)协调的动态过程,这些介质可抑制炎症持续相关事件,如血管生成、促炎细胞因子的释放、凋亡细胞的清除以及微生物的清除。在这些促消退分子中,源自必需多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)的分子已被证明对包括IBD在内的多种人类炎症性疾病具有有益作用。在此,我们总结了涉及免疫反应的细胞和分子成分以及PUFAs及其衍生物在肠道中的抗炎和促消退特性的机制,重点关注ω-3和ω-6 LMs。这些脂肪酸可能通过以下方式影响IBD的进展:减少中性粒细胞穿过肠道血管和上皮的迁移,防止促炎细胞因子的释放和黏附分子的上调,最终促进其他促消退分子的产生。我们还讨论了在IBD患者和小鼠模型中使用促消退PUFAs改善肠道炎症的众多尝试。尽管它们在减轻炎症方面的作用无可争议,但先前描述PUFA给药预防或治疗IBD效果的研究结果存在争议。因此,不仅需要更多努力来识别和解释PUFAs在肠道中的生理功能,还需要揭示这些促消退LMs可能在这些肠道相关疾病中失调的新生物合成途径。我们认为,无论是PUFAs还是专门促进消退调节介质和途径的新药物,IBD患者对其耐受性都将更好,且具有避免免疫抑制的优势。