• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的一项国家卫生计划。一项医生的提议。

A national health program for the United States. A physicians' proposal.

作者信息

Himmelstein D U, Woolhandler S

机构信息

Center for National Health Program Studies, Cambridge Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 12;320(2):102-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901123200206.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM198901123200206
PMID:2911282
Abstract

Our health care system is failing. Tens of millions of people are uninsured, costs are skyrocketing, and the bureaucracy is expanding. Patchwork reforms succeed only in exchanging old problems for new ones. It is time for basic change in American medicine. We propose a national health program that would (1) fully cover everyone under a single, comprehensive public insurance program; (2) pay hospitals and nursing homes a total (global) annual amount to cover all operating expenses; (3) fund capital costs through separate appropriations; (4) pay for physicians' services and ambulatory services in any of three ways: through fee-for-service payments with a simplified fee schedule and mandatory acceptance of the national health program payment as the total payment for a service or procedure (assignment), through global budgets for hospitals and clinics employing salaried physicians, or on a per capita basis (capitation); (5) be funded, at least initially, from the same sources as at present, but with all payments disbursed from a single pool; and (6) contain costs through savings on billing and bureaucracy, improved health planning, and the ability of the national health program, as the single payer for services, to establish overall spending limits. Through this proposal, we hope to provide a pragmatic framework for public debate of fundamental health-policy reform.

摘要

我们的医疗保健系统正在失灵。数千万人没有医保,成本飞涨,官僚机构不断膨胀。修修补补的改革只是用老问题换了新问题。美国医疗领域进行根本性变革的时候到了。我们提议实施一项全国性医疗计划,该计划将:(1)通过单一、全面的公共保险计划为每个人提供全面覆盖;(2)每年向医院和疗养院支付一笔总计(整体)金额,以涵盖所有运营费用;(3)通过单独拨款为资本成本提供资金;(4)通过以下三种方式之一支付医生服务和门诊服务费用:采用简化收费表的按服务收费,并强制接受全国性医疗计划付款作为某项服务或程序的全额付款(指派),通过为聘用受薪医生的医院和诊所制定整体预算,或按人均(人头)计算;(5)至少在初期,从与目前相同的来源获得资金,但所有付款都从一个资金池中支出;(6)通过节省计费和官僚机构成本、改进医疗规划以及全国性医疗计划作为服务的单一付款人设定总体支出限额的能力来控制成本。通过这一提议,我们希望为根本性医疗政策改革的公开辩论提供一个务实的框架。

相似文献

1
A national health program for the United States. A physicians' proposal.美国的一项国家卫生计划。一项医生的提议。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 12;320(2):102-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901123200206.
2
Single-payer national health insurance. Physicians' views.单一支付者国家医疗保险。医生的观点。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Feb 9;164(3):300-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.3.300.
3
New payment model for rural health services in Mongolia.蒙古农村医疗卫生服务的新支付模式。
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Jan-Mar;6(1):434. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
4
National health care reform and a single-payer system: messiah or pariah?国家医疗保健改革与单一支付者制度:救世主还是贱民?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1997 Winter;19(3):341-56.
5
Health USA. A national health program for the United States.《美国健康》。一项针对美国的全国性健康计划。
JAMA. 1992;267(4):552-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.4.552.
6
Physician payment 2008 for interventionalists: current state of health care policy.2008年介入治疗医生的薪酬:医疗保健政策现状
Pain Physician. 2007 Sep;10(5):607-26.
7
How does Canada do it? A comparison of expenditures for physicians' services in the United States and Canada.加拿大是如何做到的?美国和加拿大医生服务支出的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1990 Sep 27;323(13):884-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199009273231306.
8
Including an all-payer reimbursement system in a universal health insurance program.在全民健康保险计划中纳入全支付方报销系统。
Inquiry. 1992 Summer;29(2):203-12.
9
Checking it once, checking it twice.
Inquiry. 1993 Winter;30(4):345-51.
10
Whither private health insurance? Self-destruction or rebirth?私人医疗保险何去何从?自我毁灭还是重生?
Front Health Serv Manage. 1992 Fall;9(1):5-31; discussion 46-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Is health care a luxury or necessity good? Evidence from Asian countries.医疗保健是奢侈品还是必需品?来自亚洲国家的证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2019 Jun;19(2):213-233. doi: 10.1007/s10754-018-9253-0. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
2
Global budgets in Maryland: early evidence on revenues, expenses, and margins in regulated and unregulated services.马里兰州的全球预算:关于受监管和不受监管服务的收入、支出及利润的早期证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2018 Dec;18(4):395-408. doi: 10.1007/s10754-018-9239-y. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
3
HSOs, HMOs, and CHOs: The Continuing History of Capitation-Funded Health Care.
自付额资助的医疗保健的持续历史:HSO、HMO 和 CHO。
Can Fam Physician. 1990 Aug;36:1402-6.
4
U.S. physicians' views on financing options to expand health insurance coverage: a national survey.美国医生对扩大医疗保险覆盖范围的融资选择的看法:一项全国性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Apr;24(4):526-31. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0916-x. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
5
A national health insurance program for the United States.美国的一项国家医疗保险计划。
PLoS Med. 2004 Nov;1(2):e39. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010039. Epub 2004 Nov 30.
6
What complementary and alternative medicine practitioners say about health and health care.补充与替代医学从业者对健康及医疗保健的看法。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 May-Jun;2(3):253-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.81.
7
You can't leap a chasm in two jumps: The Institute of Medicine health care quality report.你无法分两步跨越鸿沟:医学研究所医疗质量报告。
Public Health Rep. 2001 Sep-Oct;116(5):396-403. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.5.396.
8
Health insurance coverage among disabled Medicare enrollees.残疾医疗保险参保人的医疗保险覆盖情况。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1991 Summer;12(4):27-37.
9
Ethics and value strategies used in prioritizing mental health services in Oregon.俄勒冈州在心理健康服务优先级划分中所采用的伦理与价值策略。
HEC Forum. 1993 Sep;5(5):322-39. doi: 10.1007/BF01560486.
10
A layman's guide to the U.S. health care system.美国医疗保健系统入门指南。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Fall;14(1):151-69.