• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用 AGREE II 工具对 tic 障碍临床实践指南进行质量评估。

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines on tic disorders with AGREE II instrument.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China second hospital, Sichuan University, No. 20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China second hospital, Sichuan University, No. 20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, China; West China school of pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:385-391. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.060. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.060
PMID:29120847
Abstract

To assess the methodological quality of existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the treatment of tic disorders (TDs) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument and summarize the guideline recommendations. Five CPGs met our inclusion criteria. The mean percentages for the AGREE II domain scores were: scope and purpose 83.33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.78-94.44%), stakeholder involvement 62.22% (95% CI, 38.89-94.44%), rigor of development 47.08% (95% CI, 6.25-83.33%), clarity of presentation 87.78% (95% CI, 72.22-94.44%), applicability 56.67% (95% CI, 33.33-87.50%), and editorial independence 46.67% (95% CI, 8.33-91.67%). There were large differences among the five CPGs concerning the categorization of evidence and recommendations. The recommendations for drug therapy were similar in all five CPGs, although there was controversy in certain areas. The methodological quality of CPGs for TDs was acceptable in terms of scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, and clarity of presentation. However, CPG developers need to pay more attention to rigorous development processes, applicability, and editorial independence. Developers of future CPGs should improve adherence to the AGREE II guidelines. In addition, high quality studies on the treatment of TDs are needed to provide more evidence for developing guidelines.

摘要

采用评估健康保健领域指南的研究与评价工具(AGREE II)评估现有的 tic 障碍(TDs)治疗临床实践指南(CPGs)的方法学质量,并总结指南建议。符合纳入标准的 CPG 有 5 项。AGREE II 各领域评分的平均百分比为:范围和目的 83.33%(95%置信区间 [CI],77.78-94.44%),利益相关者参与 62.22%(95% CI,38.89-94.44%),制定的严谨性 47.08%(95% CI,6.25-83.33%),表述的清晰性 87.78%(95% CI,72.22-94.44%),适用性 56.67%(95% CI,33.33-87.50%),编辑独立性 46.67%(95% CI,8.33-91.67%)。在证据分类和建议方面,这 5 项 CPG 之间存在很大差异。虽然在某些领域存在争议,但 5 项 CPG 对药物治疗的建议是相似的。从范围和目的、利益相关者参与以及表述的清晰性来看,TDs CPG 的方法学质量是可以接受的。然而,CPG 开发者需要更加关注严格的开发过程、适用性和编辑独立性。未来 CPG 的开发者应该提高对 AGREE II 指南的遵循程度。此外,还需要开展高质量的 TD 治疗研究,为指南制定提供更多证据。

相似文献

1
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines on tic disorders with AGREE II instrument.采用 AGREE II 工具对 tic 障碍临床实践指南进行质量评估。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:385-391. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.060. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for diabetes mellitus published in China between 2007 and 2017 using the AGREE II instrument.使用AGREE II工具对2007年至2017年间在中国发表的糖尿病临床实践指南进行质量评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):e022392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022392.
3
Guidelines in Low and Middle Income Countries Paper 3: Appraisal of Philippine Clinical Practice Guidelines using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II: improvement needed for rigor, applicability, and editorial independence.中低收入国家指南 3:使用 AGREE II 评价菲律宾临床实践指南:需要提高严谨性、适用性和编辑独立性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
4
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines on treatments for oral cancer.口腔癌治疗临床实践指南的质量评估。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Apr;65:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
5
Clinical practice guidelines for treatment of acne vulgaris: a critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.寻常痤疮治疗临床实践指南:应用 AGREE II 工具进行的批判性评价。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2014 Apr;306(3):269-77. doi: 10.1007/s00403-013-1394-x. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
6
Sri Lankan clinical practice guidelines: A methodological quality assessment utilizing the AGREE II instrument.斯里兰卡临床实践指南:利用 AGREE II 工具进行方法学质量评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;25(4):630-636. doi: 10.1111/jep.13048. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
7
Quality assessment of peripheral artery disease clinical guidelines.外周动脉疾病临床指南的质量评估
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Apr;63(4):1091-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.040.
8
Nutrition in critically ill adults: A systematic quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines.危重症成年患者的营养:临床实践指南的系统质量评估
Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;35(6):1219-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
9
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for infectious diseases in China.中国传染病临床实践指南的质量评估。
J Evid Based Med. 2018 May;11(2):95-100. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12293. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies.过去二十年临床实践指南的质量:指南评估研究的系统综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e58. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2010.042077.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence Based Research on Medication Patterns in the Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Tic Disorders: A Complete Review.基于证据的中医治疗抽动障碍用药模式研究:全面综述
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Sep 10;21:2001-2016. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S543465. eCollection 2025.
2
Complementary and alternative medicine recommendations for depression: a systematic review and assessment of clinical practice guidelines.补充和替代医学治疗抑郁症的建议:系统评价和临床实践指南评估。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-03085-1.
3
Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for genetic testing in children: A systematic assessment using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation II instrument.
儿童基因检测临床实践指南的方法学质量:使用研究与评价指南II工具进行的系统评估
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(52):e18521. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018521.
4
Assessing the Quality of Existing Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chemotherapy Drug Extravasation by Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II.通过《研究与评价指南II》评估现有化疗药物外渗临床实践指南的质量
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019 Nov 7;24(6):410-416. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_80_19. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
5
An appraisal of emergency medicine clinical practice guidelines: Do we agree?急诊医学临床实践指南评估:我们意见一致吗?
Int J Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;73(2):e13289. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13289. Epub 2018 Nov 14.