• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COPD 患者加速度计的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。

Validity and Reliability of Accelerometers in Patients With COPD: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint.

出版信息

J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018 May;38(3):147-158. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000284.

DOI:10.1097/HCR.0000000000000284
PMID:29120966
Abstract

PURPOSE

Reduced physical activity is associated with poor prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Accelerometers have greatly improved quantification of physical activity by providing information on step counts, body positions, energy expenditure, and magnitude of force. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the validity and reliability of accelerometers used in patients with COPD.

METHODS

An electronic database search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was performed. Study quality was assessed with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist while methodological quality was assessed using the modified Quality Appraisal Tool for Reliability Studies.

RESULTS

The search yielded 5392 studies; 25 met inclusion criteria. The SenseWear Pro armband reported high criterion validity under controlled conditions (r = 0.75-0.93) and high reliability (ICC = 0.84-0.86) for step counts. The DynaPort MiniMod demonstrated highest concurrent validity for step count using both video and manual methods.

DISCUSSION

Validity of the SenseWear Pro armband varied between studies especially in free-living conditions, slower walking speeds, and with addition of weights during gait. A high degree of variability was found in the outcomes used and statistical analyses performed between studies, indicating a need for further studies to measure reliability and validity of accelerometers in COPD.

CONCLUSION

The SenseWear Pro armband is the most commonly used accelerometer in COPD, but measurement properties are limited by gait speed variability and assistive device use. DynaPort MiniMod and Stepwatch accelerometers demonstrated high validity in patients with COPD but lack reliability data.

摘要

目的

体力活动减少与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的预后不良有关。加速度计通过提供步数、身体姿势、能量消耗和力的大小等信息,极大地提高了体力活动的量化水平。本系统评价的目的是比较用于 COPD 患者的加速度计的有效性和可靠性。

方法

对 MEDLINE 和 CINAHL 进行电子数据库检索。使用强化观察性研究报告流行病学清单评估研究质量,同时使用可靠性研究改良质量评估工具评估方法学质量。

结果

搜索结果产生了 5392 项研究;25 项符合纳入标准。在受控条件下,SenseWear Pro 臂带报告了高的标准相关性(r = 0.75-0.93)和高的可靠性(ICC = 0.84-0.86),用于步数测量。DynaPort MiniMod 在使用视频和手动方法进行步数测量时,表现出最高的同时有效性。

讨论

在自由生活条件下、较慢的步行速度下以及在步态中添加重量时,SenseWear Pro 臂带的有效性在研究之间存在差异。研究之间在使用的结果和进行的统计分析方面存在很大的差异,这表明需要进一步的研究来衡量 COPD 患者中加速度计的可靠性和有效性。

结论

SenseWear Pro 臂带是 COPD 中最常用的加速度计,但由于步态速度的可变性和辅助设备的使用,其测量特性受到限制。DynaPort MiniMod 和 Stepwatch 加速度计在 COPD 患者中表现出高的有效性,但缺乏可靠性数据。

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of Accelerometers in Patients With COPD: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.COPD 患者加速度计的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018 May;38(3):147-158. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000284.
2
Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported, Rater-Based, and Hybrid Physical Activity Assessments in COPD: A Systematic Review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者报告、评估者评估和混合体力活动评估的可靠性和有效性:系统评价。
COPD. 2020 Dec;17(6):721-731. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1830963. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
3
Validity of six activity monitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparison with indirect calorimetry.六种活动监测器在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的有效性:与间接测热法的比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039198. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
4
Accuracy of three activity monitors in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparison with video recordings.三种活动监测仪在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的准确性:与视频记录的比较
COPD. 2014 Sep;11(5):560-7. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2014.898033. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
5
Reliability and validity of the multimedia activity recall in children and adults (MARCA) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中多媒体活动回忆(MARCA)在儿童和成人中的可靠性与有效性
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e81274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081274. eCollection 2013.
6
Validity and usability of low-cost accelerometers for internet-based self-monitoring of physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.低成本加速度计在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者基于互联网的身体活动自我监测中的有效性和可用性。
Interact J Med Res. 2014 Oct 27;3(4):e14. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3056.
7
Physical Activity Measurement Accuracy in Individuals With Chronic Lung Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Method Comparison Studies.慢性肺病患者身体活动测量的准确性:一项方法比较研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Nov;96(11):2079-88.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
8
Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.消费者可穿戴活动追踪器有效性和可靠性的系统评价
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 18;12:159. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1.
9
Reliability and Validity of Objective Measures of Physical Activity in Youth With Cerebral Palsy Who Are Ambulatory.患有脑瘫的能行走青少年身体活动客观测量指标的信度和效度
Phys Ther. 2016 Jan;96(1):37-45. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140201. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
10
Ankle Accelerometry for Assessing Physical Activity Among Adolescent Girls: Threshold Determination, Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility.用于评估青春期女孩身体活动的脚踝加速度计:阈值确定、效度、信度和可行性
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2015;86(4):397-405. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2015.1063574. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical Activity and Physical Function One Year After Hospital Discharge for COVID-19.新冠病毒病出院一年后的体力活动与身体功能
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 2;14(17):6206. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176206.
2
Myostatin/Smad2/Smad3 pathway define a differential clinical phenotype in COPD-associated sarcopenia.肌生成抑制蛋白/信号转导分子Smad2/信号转导分子Smad3通路决定了慢性阻塞性肺疾病相关性肌肉减少症的不同临床表型。
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Apr 22;11(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00772-2024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Exploring the impact of the environment on physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (EPCOT)-A comparative analysis between suggested and free walking: Protocol study.
探究环境对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者体力活动的影响(EPCOT)-建议和自由步行之间的比较分析:方案研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 13;19(8):e0306045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306045. eCollection 2024.
4
Relationship between Volitional and Non-Volitional Quadriceps Muscle Endurance in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者股四头肌自主与非自主耐力之间的关系
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 15;14(2):190. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14020190.
5
Measurement properties of device-based physical activity instruments in ambulatory adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases: a scoping review.针对患有身体残疾和/或慢性病的非卧床成年人,基于设备的身体活动测量仪器的测量属性:一项范围综述
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Sep 21;15(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00717-0.
6
Assessment of sedentary behaviour in individuals with COPD: how many days are necessary?慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者久坐行为的评估:需要多少天?
ERJ Open Res. 2023 Aug 29;9(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00732-2022. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Technologies for the Instrumental Evaluation of Physical Function in Persons Affected by Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.技术评估工具在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的物理功能:系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 1;22(17):6620. doi: 10.3390/s22176620.
8
Gait disorders in CKD patients: muscle wasting or cognitive impairment? A cross-sectional pilot study to investigate gait signatures in Stage 1-5 CKD patients.慢性肾脏病患者的步态障碍:肌肉减少症还是认知障碍?一项横断面初步研究,旨在探讨 1-5 期慢性肾脏病患者的步态特征。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Feb 21;23(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02697-8.
9
Walking on common ground: a cross-disciplinary scoping review on the clinical utility of digital mobility outcomes.立足共同基础:关于数字移动性结果临床效用的跨学科范围综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Oct 14;4(1):149. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00513-5.
10
Signatures of Gait Movement Variability in CKD Patients Scheduled for Hemodialysis Indicate Pathological Performance Before and After Hemodialysis: A Prospective, Observational Study.计划进行血液透析的慢性肾脏病患者步态运动变异性特征表明血液透析前后的病理表现:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 28;8:702029. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.702029. eCollection 2021.