• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中多媒体活动回忆(MARCA)在儿童和成人中的可靠性与有效性

Reliability and validity of the multimedia activity recall in children and adults (MARCA) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

作者信息

Hunt Toby, Williams Marie T, Olds Tim S

机构信息

Health and Use of Time Group, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia ; Respiratory Clinical Research Unit, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e81274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081274. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0081274
PMID:24312284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3842291/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reliability and validity of the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (MARCA) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

DESIGN

People with COPD and their carers completed the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (MARCA) for four, 24-hour periods (including test-retest of 2 days) while wearing a triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X+®), a multi-sensor armband (Sensewear Pro3®) and a pedometer (New Lifestyles 1000®).

SETTING

Self reported activity recalls (MARCA) and objective activity monitoring (Accelerometry) were recorded under free-living conditions.

PARTICIPANTS

24 couples were included in the analysis (COPD; age 74.4 ± 7.9 yrs, FEV1 54 ± 13% Carer; age 69.6 ± 10.9 yrs, FEV1 99 ± 24%).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Test-retest reliability was compared for MARCA activity domains and different energy expenditure zones. Validity was assessed between MARCA-derived physical activity level (in metabolic equivalent of task (MET) per minute), duration of moderate to vigorous physical activity (min) and related data from the objective measurement devices. Analysis included intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman analyses, paired t-tests (p) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (rs).

RESULTS

Reliability between occasions of recall for all activity domains was uniformly high, with test-retest correlations consistently >0.9. Validity correlations were moderate to strong (rs = 0.43-0.80) across all comparisons. The MARCA yields comparable PAL estimates and slightly higher moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) estimates.

CONCLUSION

In older adults with chronic illness, the MARCA is a valid and reliable tool for capturing not only the time and energy expenditure associated with physical and sedentary activities but also information on the types of activities.

摘要

目的

确定儿童及成人多媒体活动回忆问卷(MARCA)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的可靠性和有效性。

设计

COPD患者及其照料者在佩戴三轴加速度计(Actigraph GT3X+®)、多传感器臂带(Sensewear Pro3®)和计步器(New Lifestyles 1000®)的情况下,分四个24小时时段(包括为期2天的重测)完成儿童及成人多媒体活动回忆问卷(MARCA)。

设置

在自由生活条件下记录自我报告的活动回忆(MARCA)和客观活动监测(加速度计测量)。

参与者

24对夫妇纳入分析(COPD患者;年龄74.4±7.9岁,第一秒用力呼气容积[FEV1]54±13%;照料者;年龄69.6±10.9岁,FEV1 99±24%)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

比较MARCA活动领域和不同能量消耗区域的重测信度。评估MARCA得出的身体活动水平(每分钟代谢当量任务[MET])、中度至剧烈身体活动持续时间(分钟)与客观测量设备相关数据之间的效度。分析包括组内相关系数(ICC)、布兰德-奥特曼分析、配对t检验(p)和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数(rs)。

结果

所有活动领域回忆场合之间的信度均一致较高,重测相关性始终>0.9。所有比较中的效度相关性为中度至高度(rs = 0.43 - 0.80)。MARCA得出的身体活动水平估计值相当,中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)估计值略高。

结论

在患有慢性疾病的老年人中,MARCA是一种有效且可靠的工具,不仅可用于获取与身体活动和久坐活动相关的时间和能量消耗,还能获取活动类型的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a36/3842291/554c6ceb41c3/pone.0081274.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a36/3842291/7b2b33785ed2/pone.0081274.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a36/3842291/c983e03bee93/pone.0081274.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a36/3842291/554c6ceb41c3/pone.0081274.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a36/3842291/7b2b33785ed2/pone.0081274.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a36/3842291/c983e03bee93/pone.0081274.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a36/3842291/554c6ceb41c3/pone.0081274.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the multimedia activity recall in children and adults (MARCA) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中多媒体活动回忆(MARCA)在儿童和成人中的可靠性与有效性
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e81274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081274. eCollection 2013.
2
Validation of a computerized use of time recall for activity measurement in advanced-aged adults.用于高龄成年人活动测量的时间回忆计算机化应用的验证
J Aging Phys Act. 2014 Apr;22(2):245-54. doi: 10.1123/japa.2012-0280. Epub 2013 May 22.
3
Validating the multimedia activity recall for children and adolescents in a large New Zealand sample.验证多媒体活动回忆在新西兰大样本儿童和青少年中的有效性。
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(5):470-8. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.832354. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
4
Development and evaluation of an adult use-of-time instrument with an energy expenditure focus.开发和评估一个以能量消耗为重点的成人时间使用仪器。
J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Mar;14(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
5
Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported, Rater-Based, and Hybrid Physical Activity Assessments in COPD: A Systematic Review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者报告、评估者评估和混合体力活动评估的可靠性和有效性:系统评价。
COPD. 2020 Dec;17(6):721-731. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1830963. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
The Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adolescents (MARCA): development and evaluation.儿童和青少年多媒体活动回忆(MARCA):开发与评估
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006 May 26;3:10. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-10.
7
The validity of a computerized use of time recall, the multimedia activity recall for children and adolescents.儿童和青少年时间回忆及多媒体活动回忆的计算机化应用的有效性。
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010 Feb;22(1):34-43. doi: 10.1123/pes.22.1.34.
8
Validity of a Self-Report Recall Tool for Estimating Sedentary Behavior in Adults.一种用于评估成年人久坐行为的自我报告回忆工具的有效性
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Nov;12(11):1485-91. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2014-0602. Epub 2015 May 29.
9
Validity of self-report methods for measuring sedentary behaviour in older adults.测量老年人久坐行为的自我报告方法的有效性。
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Nov;18(6):662-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
10
Doubly labeled water validation of a computerized use-of-time recall in active young people.双标水验证法在活跃年轻人中时间使用回忆的计算机化应用。
Metabolism. 2013 Jan;62(1):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and reliability of self-reported methods for assessment of 24-h movement behaviours: a systematic review.自我报告方法评估 24 小时运动行为的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Aug 2;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01632-4.
2
Pulmonary Rehabilitation with and without a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Breathlessness in People Living with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者呼吸急促的有或无认知行为干预的肺康复:随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 24;12(23):7286. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237286.
3
Objective Measurement of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Points to Keep in Mind during Evaluations.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical activity in COPD patients: patterns and bouts.COPD 患者的体力活动:模式和持续时间。
Eur Respir J. 2013 Oct;42(4):993-1002. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00101512. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
2
Predicting daily physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的日常体力活动。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048081. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
3
Doubly labeled water validation of a computerized use-of-time recall in active young people.双标水验证法在活跃年轻人中时间使用回忆的计算机化应用。
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者身体活动和久坐行为的客观测量:评估过程中需牢记的要点
J Clin Med. 2023 May 2;12(9):3254. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093254.
4
Data Reproducibility and Effectiveness of Bronchodilators for Improving Physical Activity in COPD Patients.支气管扩张剂改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者身体活动能力的数据可重复性及有效性
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 29;9(11):3497. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113497.
5
Use of time in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Longitudinal associations with symptoms and quality of life using a compositional analysis approach.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的时间利用:应用成分分析方法对症状和生活质量的纵向关联。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214058. eCollection 2019.
6
Patterns of Time Use across the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severity Spectrum.慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度谱中的时间利用模式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 16;15(3):533. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030533.
7
Sedentary Behavior in People with and without a Chronic Health Condition: How Much, What and When?患有和未患有慢性健康状况的人群中的久坐行为:多少、是什么以及何时?
AIMS Public Health. 2016 Aug 3;3(3):503-519. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.503. eCollection 2016.
8
Use of time in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease--a systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的时间利用——系统评价。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Dec 12;9:1377-88. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S74298. eCollection 2014.
Metabolism. 2013 Jan;62(1):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
4
A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires.体力活动问卷的信度和客观标准相关有效性的系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Aug 31;9:103. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-103.
5
Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review.活动监测器在健康和慢性病中的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jul 9;9:84. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-84.
6
Validity of six activity monitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparison with indirect calorimetry.六种活动监测器在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的有效性:与间接测热法的比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039198. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
7
Self-report use-of-time tools for the assessment of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in young people: systematic review.自评时间使用工具在青少年身体活动和久坐行为评估中的应用:系统综述。
Obes Rev. 2012 Aug;13(8):711-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.00993.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
8
Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011.久坐行为与成年人后续健康结果的系统评价:1996-2011 年的纵向研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.004.
9
Daily physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的日常体力活动:系统评价。
COPD. 2011 Aug;8(4):306-19. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2011.578601. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
10
2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values.2011 年体力活动概要:活动代码和代谢当量的第二次更新。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1575-81. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12.