Suppr超能文献

低成本加速度计在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者基于互联网的身体活动自我监测中的有效性和可用性。

Validity and usability of low-cost accelerometers for internet-based self-monitoring of physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

作者信息

Vooijs Martijn, Alpay Laurence L, Snoeck-Stroband Jiska B, Beerthuizen Thijs, Siemonsma Petra C, Abbink Jannie J, Sont Jacob K, Rövekamp Ton A

机构信息

Rijnlands Rehabilitation Center, Department of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Leiden, Netherlands.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2014 Oct 27;3(4):e14. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3056.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The importance of regular physical activity for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-established. However, many patients do not meet the recommended daily amount. Accelerometers might provide patients with the information needed to increase physical activity in daily life.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess the validity and usability of low-cost Internet-connected accelerometers. Furthermore we explored patients' preferences with regards to the presentation of and feedback on monitored physical activity.

METHODS

To assess concurrent validity we conducted a field validation study with patients who wore two low-cost accelerometers, Fitbit and Physical Activity Monitor (PAM), at the same time along with a sophisticated multisensor accelerometer (SenseWear Armband) for 48 hours. Data on energy expenditure assessed from registrations from the two low-cost accelerometers were compared to the well validated SenseWear Armband which served as a reference criterion. Usability was examined in a cross-over study with patients who, in succession, wore the Fitbit and the PAM for 7 consecutive days and filled out a 16 item questionnaire with regards to the use of the corresponding device

RESULTS

The agreement between energy expenditure (METs) from the SenseWear Armband with METs estimated by the Fitbit and PAM was good (r=.77) and moderate (r=.41), respectively. The regression model that was developed for the Fitbit explained 92% whereas the PAM-model could explain 89% of total variance in METs measured by the SenseWear. With regards to the usability, both the Fitbit and PAM were well rated on all items. There were no significant differences between the two devices.

CONCLUSIONS

The low-cost Fitbit and PAM are valid and usable devices to measure physical activity in patients with COPD. These devices may be useful in long-term interventions aiming at increasing physical activity levels in these patients.

摘要

背景

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行规律体育活动的重要性已得到充分证实。然而,许多患者未达到推荐的每日运动量。加速度计可能为患者提供增加日常生活中体育活动所需的信息。

目的

我们的目的是评估低成本联网加速度计的有效性和可用性。此外,我们还探讨了患者对监测到的体育活动的呈现方式和反馈的偏好。

方法

为评估同时效度,我们进行了一项现场验证研究,让患者同时佩戴两款低成本加速度计(Fitbit和身体活动监测仪(PAM))以及一款精密多传感器加速度计(SenseWear臂带)48小时。将两款低成本加速度计记录的能量消耗数据与经验证有效的SenseWear臂带(作为参考标准)进行比较。在一项交叉研究中检查可用性,让患者依次连续7天佩戴Fitbit和PAM,并填写一份关于相应设备使用情况的16项问卷。

结果

SenseWear臂带的能量消耗(代谢当量)与Fitbit和PAM估计的代谢当量之间的一致性分别为良好(r = 0.77)和中等(r = 0.41)。为Fitbit建立的回归模型解释了92%的方差,而PAM模型可以解释SenseWear测量的代谢当量总方差的89%。关于可用性,Fitbit和PAM在所有项目上的评分都很高。两款设备之间没有显著差异。

结论

低成本的Fitbit和PAM是测量COPD患者体育活动的有效且可用的设备。这些设备可能有助于旨在提高这些患者体育活动水平的长期干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/4259960/c72a8d10dd16/ijmr_v3i4e14_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验