Suppr超能文献

经验对临床结肠镜检查能力自我评估准确性的影响。

Impact of experience on self-assessment accuracy of clinical colonoscopy competence.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):827-836.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.040. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Self-assessment is important for life-long learning and a recommended assessment method for endoscopy skills. Prior literature has not investigated self-assessment accuracy of colonoscopic competence in the clinical setting. This study aimed to determine the self-assessment accuracy of novice, intermediate, and experienced endoscopists.

METHODS

Novice (performed <50 previous colonoscopies), intermediate (50-500), and experienced (>1000) endoscopists from 5 hospitals each performed a clinical colonoscopy. Video recordings of procedures were independently assessed by 2 blinded expert endoscopists by using the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool (GiECAT). Externally assessed and self-assessed GiECAT scores were defined as the mean of the 2 video-based ratings and as participants' own assigned ratings, respectively. Self-assessment accuracy between the externally assessed and self-assessed scores was evaluated by using absolute difference scores, intraclass correlation coefficients, and the Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty novice, 10 intermediate, and 10 experienced endoscopists participated. There was moderate agreement of externally assessed and self-assessed GiECAT scores, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.80). The absolute difference scores among the 3 groups were significantly different (P = .002), with experienced endoscopists demonstrating a more accurate self-assessment ability compared with novices (P = .002). Bland-Altman plots suggest that novice and experienced endoscopists tend to overrate and underrate their clinical competence, respectively; no specific trends were associated with intermediates.

CONCLUSION

Participants demonstrated moderate self-assessment accuracy of clinical competence. Endoscopist experience was positively associated with self-assessment accuracy; novices demonstrated lower self-assessment accuracy compared with experienced endoscopists. Moreover, novices tended to overestimate their performances. Novice endoscopists may benefit from targeted interventions to improve self-assessment accuracy.

摘要

背景与目的

自我评估对于终身学习至关重要,也是内镜技能评估的推荐方法。先前的文献尚未调查临床环境中结肠镜检查能力的自我评估准确性。本研究旨在确定新手、中级和经验丰富的内镜医生的自我评估准确性。

方法

来自 5 家医院的新手(完成<50 例先前的结肠镜检查)、中级(50-500 例)和经验丰富的(>1000 例)内镜医生,每位医生进行一次临床结肠镜检查。程序的视频记录由 2 名盲法专家内镜医生使用胃肠道内镜检查能力评估工具(GiECAT)进行独立评估。外部评估和自我评估的 GiECAT 评分分别定义为 2 个基于视频的评分的平均值和参与者自己分配的评分。通过绝对差值评分、组内相关系数和 Bland-Altman 分析评估外部评估和自我评估评分之间的自我评估准确性。

结果

共有 20 名新手、10 名中级和 10 名经验丰富的内镜医生参加了研究。外部评估和自我评估的 GiECAT 评分具有中度一致性,组内相关系数为 0.65(95%置信区间,0.44-0.80)。3 组之间的绝对差值评分差异具有统计学意义(P=0.002),经验丰富的内镜医生的自我评估能力比新手更准确(P=0.002)。Bland-Altman 图表明,新手和经验丰富的内镜医生分别倾向于高估和低估他们的临床能力;中级内镜医生没有特定的趋势。

结论

参与者对临床能力的自我评估准确性适中。内镜医生的经验与自我评估准确性呈正相关;新手的自我评估准确性低于经验丰富的内镜医生。此外,新手倾向于高估自己的表现。新手内镜医生可能受益于有针对性的干预措施,以提高自我评估的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验