Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):827-836.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.040. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
Self-assessment is important for life-long learning and a recommended assessment method for endoscopy skills. Prior literature has not investigated self-assessment accuracy of colonoscopic competence in the clinical setting. This study aimed to determine the self-assessment accuracy of novice, intermediate, and experienced endoscopists.
Novice (performed <50 previous colonoscopies), intermediate (50-500), and experienced (>1000) endoscopists from 5 hospitals each performed a clinical colonoscopy. Video recordings of procedures were independently assessed by 2 blinded expert endoscopists by using the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool (GiECAT). Externally assessed and self-assessed GiECAT scores were defined as the mean of the 2 video-based ratings and as participants' own assigned ratings, respectively. Self-assessment accuracy between the externally assessed and self-assessed scores was evaluated by using absolute difference scores, intraclass correlation coefficients, and the Bland-Altman analysis.
Twenty novice, 10 intermediate, and 10 experienced endoscopists participated. There was moderate agreement of externally assessed and self-assessed GiECAT scores, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.80). The absolute difference scores among the 3 groups were significantly different (P = .002), with experienced endoscopists demonstrating a more accurate self-assessment ability compared with novices (P = .002). Bland-Altman plots suggest that novice and experienced endoscopists tend to overrate and underrate their clinical competence, respectively; no specific trends were associated with intermediates.
Participants demonstrated moderate self-assessment accuracy of clinical competence. Endoscopist experience was positively associated with self-assessment accuracy; novices demonstrated lower self-assessment accuracy compared with experienced endoscopists. Moreover, novices tended to overestimate their performances. Novice endoscopists may benefit from targeted interventions to improve self-assessment accuracy.
自我评估对于终身学习至关重要,也是内镜技能评估的推荐方法。先前的文献尚未调查临床环境中结肠镜检查能力的自我评估准确性。本研究旨在确定新手、中级和经验丰富的内镜医生的自我评估准确性。
来自 5 家医院的新手(完成<50 例先前的结肠镜检查)、中级(50-500 例)和经验丰富的(>1000 例)内镜医生,每位医生进行一次临床结肠镜检查。程序的视频记录由 2 名盲法专家内镜医生使用胃肠道内镜检查能力评估工具(GiECAT)进行独立评估。外部评估和自我评估的 GiECAT 评分分别定义为 2 个基于视频的评分的平均值和参与者自己分配的评分。通过绝对差值评分、组内相关系数和 Bland-Altman 分析评估外部评估和自我评估评分之间的自我评估准确性。
共有 20 名新手、10 名中级和 10 名经验丰富的内镜医生参加了研究。外部评估和自我评估的 GiECAT 评分具有中度一致性,组内相关系数为 0.65(95%置信区间,0.44-0.80)。3 组之间的绝对差值评分差异具有统计学意义(P=0.002),经验丰富的内镜医生的自我评估能力比新手更准确(P=0.002)。Bland-Altman 图表明,新手和经验丰富的内镜医生分别倾向于高估和低估他们的临床能力;中级内镜医生没有特定的趋势。
参与者对临床能力的自我评估准确性适中。内镜医生的经验与自我评估准确性呈正相关;新手的自我评估准确性低于经验丰富的内镜医生。此外,新手倾向于高估自己的表现。新手内镜医生可能受益于有针对性的干预措施,以提高自我评估的准确性。