Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 671 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
University of Vermont, Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2018 Mar;43(1):57-73. doi: 10.1007/s10484-017-9382-0.
Despite previous findings of therapeutic effects for heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) on asthma, it is not known whether HRVB can substitute either for controller or rescue medication, or whether it affects airway inflammation. Sixty-eight paid volunteer steroid naïve study participants with mild or moderate asthma were given 3 months of HRVB or a comparison condition consisting of EEG alpha biofeedback with relaxing music and relaxed paced breathing (EEG+), in a two-center trial. All participants received a month of intensive asthma education prior to randomization. Both treatment conditions produced similar significant improvements on the methacholine challenge test (MCT), asthma symptoms, and asthma quality of life (AQOL). MCT effects were of similar size to those of enhanced placebo procedures reported elsewhere, and were 65% of those of a course of a high-potency inhaled steroid budesonide given to a sub-group of participants following biofeedback training. Exhaled nitric oxide decreased significantly only in the HRVB group, 81% of the budesonide effect, but with no significant differences between groups. Participants reported becoming more relaxed during practice of both techniques. Administration of albuterol after biofeedback sessions produced a large improvement in pulmonary function test results, indicating that neither treatment normalized pulmonary function as a potent controller medication would have done. Impulse oscillometry showed increased upper airway (vocal cord) resistance during biofeedback periods in both groups. These data suggest that HRVB should not be considered an alternative to asthma controller medications (e.g., inhaled steroids), although both biofeedback conditions produced some beneficial effects, warranting further research, and suggesting potential complementary effects. Various hypotheses are presented to explain why HRVB effects on asthma appeared smaller in this study than in earlier studies. Clinical Trial Registration NCT02766374.
尽管先前有研究发现心率变异性生物反馈(HRVB)对哮喘有治疗作用,但目前尚不清楚 HRVB 是否可以替代控制器药物或急救药物,或者它是否会影响气道炎症。在一项双中心试验中,68 名有偿志愿的、初始未使用类固醇的轻中度哮喘患者被分为两组,分别接受 3 个月的 HRVB 治疗或包含脑电图阿尔法生物反馈和放松音乐及有节奏呼吸的对照条件(EEG+)治疗。所有参与者在随机分组前都接受了一个月的强化哮喘教育。两种治疗条件均使乙酰甲胆碱激发试验(MCT)、哮喘症状和哮喘生活质量(AQOL)得到显著改善。MCT 效果与其他地方报告的增强安慰剂程序相似,并且与生物反馈训练后给予一组参与者高剂量吸入性布地奈德治疗的效果相当,占 65%。呼气一氧化氮仅在 HRVB 组显著降低,降低幅度为布地奈德的 81%,但两组间无显著差异。参与者报告在练习两种技术时都感到更加放松。生物反馈治疗后给予沙丁胺醇治疗可显著改善肺功能测试结果,表明两种治疗都没有像强力控制器药物那样使肺功能正常化。脉冲震荡测量显示,在两组的生物反馈期间,上呼吸道(声带)阻力均增加。这些数据表明,HRVB 不应被视为哮喘控制器药物(如吸入性类固醇)的替代品,尽管两种生物反馈条件都产生了一些有益的效果,值得进一步研究,并表明可能具有互补作用。提出了各种假设来解释为什么在这项研究中 HRVB 对哮喘的影响比早期研究小。临床试验注册 NCT02766374。