a Department of Public Health , La Trobe University , Melbourne , Australia.
b Victorian Spinal Cord Service, Austin Health , Heidelberg , Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Feb;41(4):374-381. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1397775. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
The media plays an important role in shaping society's beliefs about disability and sport. The aim of this systematic review is to identify how elite athletes with disability are portrayed in the media.
Six electronic databases were searched from 2001 to March 2017 for quantitative or qualitative content analysis of media coverage of elite athletes with disability: SportsDiscus, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Medline 1996-, Embase, and Proquest. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent assessors.
Seventeen moderate quality articles were included. Six themes emerged from the data such as frequency of articles and photos about elite athletes with disability; athlete gender; athlete nationality; disability; athleticism; and Olympic Games versus Paralympic Games. Our results show that elite athletes with disability are less visible in the media than their nondisabled counterparts; female athletes received less coverage than male; the media favored domestic athletes and certain types of disability; and, although there was a focus on athleticism, this was underpinned by a "supercrip" narrative and a medicalised description of disability.
Although there has been a positive shift in the narrative around elite athletes with disability in media, relative absence and differing portrayal is present. Considering the power of media shaping society's perceptions of disability, further investigation is warranted. Implications for Rehabilitation Media has a role in how elite athletes with disability are portrayed and consequently perceived by the public. Elite athletes with disability rarely feature in media. Images of disability are minimized, and certain types of disabilities are favored. An athletic narrative is emerging; however, a medicalised description of athletes remains, shifting the focus from athleticism. "Supercrip" and "Superhuman" terms are commonly used, but may negatively impact the broader disability community.
媒体在塑造社会对残疾和运动的观念方面发挥着重要作用。本系统评价的目的是确定媒体如何描述残疾精英运动员。
从 2001 年至 2017 年 3 月,六个电子数据库(SportsDiscus、CINAHL、PsychInfo、Medline 1996-、Embase 和 Proquest)被用于搜索对残疾精英运动员的媒体报道进行定量或定性内容分析的文章:数量或照片的文章;残疾精英运动员;运动员性别;运动员国籍;残疾;运动能力;以及奥运会与残奥会。两名独立评估员进行了质量评估和数据提取。
共纳入 17 篇中等质量的文章。数据中出现了 6 个主题,例如残疾精英运动员的文章和照片的频率;运动员性别;运动员国籍;残疾;运动能力;以及奥运会与残奥会。我们的结果表明,残疾精英运动员在媒体上的可见度低于非残疾运动员;女性运动员的报道比男性运动员少;媒体青睐国内运动员和某些类型的残疾;尽管强调了运动能力,但这是基于“超级残疾”的叙述和对残疾的医学描述。
尽管媒体对残疾精英运动员的叙述有了积极的转变,但仍然存在相对缺失和不同的描述。考虑到媒体塑造社会对残疾的看法的力量,需要进一步调查。
媒体在塑造公众对残疾精英运动员的看法方面发挥着作用。残疾精英运动员很少在媒体上出现。残疾的形象被最小化,某些类型的残疾受到青睐。一种运动的叙述正在出现;然而,运动员仍然存在医学描述,将焦点从运动能力上转移开。“超级残疾”和“超人”的术语经常被使用,但可能会对更广泛的残疾群体产生负面影响。