a Department of Psychology , Brock University , St. Catharines , Ontario , Canada.
J Pers Assess. 2019 Jan-Feb;101(1):54-63. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1388808. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
The distinction between shyness and social anxiety remains unclear in the literature. In an attempt to shed further light on this issue, our research evaluated whether shyness and social anxiety were the same construct underlying various measurement scales. Participants (N = 801, M = 36.21, range = 18-74, female = 53.10%) responded to 10 questionnaires assessing either shyness or social anxiety. Evidence indicated that the scales were highly correlated and loaded onto 1 factor. Confirmatory factor analysis corroborated this finding. A second exploratory factor analysis revealed that all the shyness and social anxiety items best loaded together onto 3 factors: one corresponding to fear of negative evaluation, embarrassment, self-consciousness, scrutiny, authority, interaction anxiety, and shyness (71.0%); a second comprised of primarily interaction anxiety and shyness (17.7%); and a third associated with performance anxiety (7.5%). All scales were similarly discriminated from sociability. Overall, the constructs of shyness and social anxiety were not differentiated from each other. Researchers should carefully consider what items are included in shyness and social anxiety scales if these constructs are to be distinguished from one another.
文献中对羞怯和社交焦虑之间的区别仍不清楚。为了进一步阐明这个问题,我们的研究评估了羞怯和社交焦虑是否是各种测量量表背后的同一结构。参与者(N=801,M=36.21,范围为 18-74,女性=53.10%)回答了 10 个评估羞怯或社交焦虑的问卷。有证据表明,这些量表高度相关,并加载到 1 个因子上。验证性因子分析证实了这一发现。第二次探索性因子分析表明,所有的羞怯和社交焦虑项目最好一起加载到 3 个因子上:一个对应于对负面评价、尴尬、自我意识、审视、权威、互动焦虑和羞怯的恐惧(71.0%);第二个主要由互动焦虑和羞怯组成(17.7%);第三个与表现焦虑有关(7.5%)。所有的量表都与社交能力相似地区分开来。总的来说,羞怯和社交焦虑的结构没有相互区分。如果要将这些结构彼此区分开来,研究人员应该仔细考虑在羞怯和社交焦虑量表中包含哪些项目。