Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 15;121(2):143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
Leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) is associated with longevity in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, less is known about prognostic significance of longitudinally assessed LTPA in patients with stable CAD. The present study assessed the relationship between changes in LTPA and cardiac mortality in patients with CAD. Patients with angiographically documented CAD (n = 1,746) underwent clinical examination and echocardiography at the baseline. Lifestyle factors, including LTPA (inactive, irregularly active, active, highly active), were surveyed at baseline and after 2 years' follow-up. Thereafter, the patients entered the follow-up (median: 4.5 years; first to third quartile: 3.4 to 5.8 years) during which cardiac deaths were registered (n = 68, 3.9%). The patients who remained inactive (n = 114, 18 events, 16%) and became inactive (n = 228, 18 events, 8%) had 7.6- (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2 to 13.6) and 3.7-fold (95% CI 2.1 to 6.7) univariate risk for cardiac death compared with those who remained at least irregularly active (n = 1,351, 30 events, 2%), respectively. After adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, diabetes, previous myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction, angina pectoris grading, cardiovascular event during initial 2-year follow-up, smoking and alcohol consumption, the patients who remained inactive and became inactive still had 4.9- (95% CI 2.4 to 9.8, p <0.001) and 2.4-fold (95% CI 1.3 to 4.5, p <0.01) risk for cardiac death, respectively, compared with patients remaining at least irregularly active. In conclusion, LTPA has important prognostic value for cardiac death in patients with stable CAD. Even minor changes in LTPA over 2 years were related to the subsequent risk for cardiac death.
休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)与冠心病(CAD)患者的长寿有关。然而,对于稳定 CAD 患者纵向评估的 LTPA 的预后意义知之甚少。本研究评估了 CAD 患者 LTPA 变化与心脏死亡率之间的关系。
经血管造影证实患有 CAD(n=1746)的患者在基线时接受临床检查和超声心动图检查。在基线和 2 年随访时调查生活方式因素,包括 LTPA(不活跃、不规则活跃、活跃、高度活跃)。此后,患者进入随访期(中位数:4.5 年;第一至第三四分位数:3.4 至 5.8 年),在此期间记录了心脏死亡(n=68,3.9%)。保持不活跃状态的患者(n=114,18 例事件,16%)和变得不活跃的患者(n=228,18 例事件,8%)发生心脏死亡的风险分别为 7.6(95%置信区间 [CI] 4.2 至 13.6)和 3.7 倍(95% CI 2.1 至 6.7),与至少保持不规则活跃状态的患者(n=1351,30 例事件,2%)相比。
在校正年龄、性别、体重指数、糖尿病、既往心肌梗死、左心室射血分数、心绞痛分级、初始 2 年随访期间的心血管事件、吸烟和饮酒后,保持不活跃和变得不活跃的患者发生心脏死亡的风险仍然分别为 4.9(95% CI 2.4 至 9.8,p<0.001)和 2.4 倍(95% CI 1.3 至 4.5,p<0.01),与至少保持不规则活跃状态的患者相比。
总之,LTPA 对稳定 CAD 患者的心脏死亡具有重要的预后价值。即使在 2 年内 LTPA 发生微小变化,也与随后的心脏死亡风险相关。