Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Finland.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;13(6):e007908. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007908. Epub 2020 May 20.
The association between leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in coronary artery disease patients is not well known. We aim to assess whether there is an association between LTPA and the risk of SCD and non-SCD in patients with coronary artery disease.
Patients with angiographically verified coronary artery disease (n=1946) underwent a clinical evaluation, including filling in an LTPA questionnaire and extensive risk profiling at the baseline. The patients were classified into 4 groups according to LTPA: (1) inactive; (2) irregularly active; (3) active, exercise regularly 2× to 3× weekly; (4) highly active, exercise regularly ≥4× weekly. Age, sex, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, history of myocardial infarction, Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris class, and exercise capacity were used as covariates in the multivariate Cox regression analysis.
During follow-up (median 6.3 years), 52 SCDs and 49 non-SCDs occurred. Inactive patients had increased risk for SCD compared with active patients (hazard ratio, 2.45 [95% CI, 1.01-5.98]; <0.05). A significant LTPA×Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris class interaction was observed in SCD risk (=0.019 in highly active patients). LTPA was not associated with SCD in patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris class 1 (n=1107, 18 events). Among patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris class 2 or higher (n=839, 34 events), increased risk for SCD was encountered in highly active patients (hazard ratio, 7.46 [95% CI, 2.32-23.9]; <0.001) and inactive patients (hazard ratio, 3.64 [95% CI, 1.16-11.5]; <0.05) as compared to active patients. A linear association was observed between LTPA and non-SCD; those with high LTPA had the lowest risk for non-SCD.
Inactive coronary artery disease patients had increased risk for SCD. In subgroup analysis among symptomatic patients, the risk of SCD was increased in highly active and inactive patients compared with active patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01426685.
休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)与冠状动脉疾病患者心源性猝死(SCD)风险之间的关联尚不清楚。我们旨在评估 LTPA 与冠状动脉疾病患者 SCD 和非 SCD 风险之间是否存在关联。
经血管造影证实患有冠状动脉疾病的患者(n=1946)接受了临床评估,包括填写 LTPA 问卷和基线时进行广泛的风险分析。根据 LTPA 将患者分为 4 组:(1)不活动;(2)不规律活动;(3)有规律地活动,每周 2 到 3 次;(4)高度活跃,每周至少进行 4 次锻炼。年龄、性别、体重指数、左心室射血分数、2 型糖尿病、心肌梗死史、加拿大心血管学会心绞痛分级、运动能力被用作多变量 Cox 回归分析中的协变量。
在随访期间(中位数为 6.3 年),发生了 52 例 SCD 和 49 例非 SCD。与活跃患者相比,不活动患者的 SCD 风险增加(危险比,2.45[95%置信区间,1.01-5.98];<0.05)。在 SCD 风险方面观察到显著的 LTPA×加拿大心血管学会心绞痛分级交互作用(在高度活跃患者中为=0.019)。在加拿大心血管学会心绞痛分级为 1 级的患者(n=1107,18 例事件)中,LTPA 与 SCD 无关。在加拿大心血管学会心绞痛分级为 2 级或更高的患者(n=839,34 例事件)中,与活跃患者相比,高度活跃患者(危险比,7.46[95%置信区间,2.32-23.9];<0.001)和不活动患者(危险比,3.64[95%置信区间,1.16-11.5];<0.05)的 SCD 风险增加。LTPA 与非 SCD 之间呈线性关联;LTPA 较高的患者发生非 SCD 的风险最低。
不活动的冠状动脉疾病患者 SCD 风险增加。在有症状患者的亚组分析中,与活跃患者相比,高度活跃和不活跃患者的 SCD 风险增加。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01426685。