Suppr超能文献

辅助和替代沟通显示的视觉感知特征影响唐氏综合征患者的运动伸手效率:一项初步研究。

Visual-perceptual features of augmentative and alternative communication displays affect efficiency of motor reaching by individuals with Down syndrome: a pilot study.

作者信息

Wilkinson Krista M, Sowers Dawn J, Sainburg Robert

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

出版信息

Augment Altern Commun. 2025 May 27:1-14. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2025.2495904.

Abstract

Individuals with Down syndrome often have speech and language impairments that interfere with their ability to use speech to meet their full range of communication needs. Visual communication supports in the form of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are often a solution for individuals who require support to their own natural speech, including those with Down syndrome. Messages are produced via touch or reach to communication symbols presented on these AAC displays. While a line of past research has detailed the influence of AAC display design on the efficiency with which individuals with and without disabilities can find target symbols within an array, few studies have examined how different AAC displays might influence touch/reaching. Yet critical clinical implications arise if display design is resulting in inefficient (and fatiguing) motor/reaching behavior. This pilot study evaluated how visual-perceptual characteristics of AAC displays affected the efficiency and quality of reaches by six individuals with Down syndrome and six individuals without disabilities matched on age, gender, and hand preference.

摘要

唐氏综合征患者通常存在言语和语言障碍,这会妨碍他们运用言语来满足其全方位的交流需求。以辅助和替代沟通(AAC)形式呈现的视觉沟通支持,通常是那些自身自然言语需要支持的人群(包括唐氏综合征患者)的一种解决方案。信息通过触摸或触碰这些AAC显示屏上呈现的沟通符号来产生。虽然过去一系列研究详细阐述了AAC显示屏设计对有残疾和无残疾个体在阵列中找到目标符号的效率的影响,但很少有研究考察不同的AAC显示屏可能如何影响触摸/触碰行为。然而,如果显示屏设计导致低效(且令人疲劳)的运动/触碰行为,就会产生关键的临床影响。这项初步研究评估了AAC显示屏的视觉感知特征如何影响六名唐氏综合征患者以及六名在年龄、性别和用手偏好方面与之匹配的非残疾个体的触碰效率和质量。

相似文献

4
The agreement of phonetic transcriptions between paediatric speech and language therapists transcribing a disordered speech sample.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1981-1995. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13043. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
5
Using longitudinal qualitative research to explore the experience of receiving and using augmentative and alternative communication.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1043-1065. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12981. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
6
Use of an intelligent tutoring system for a curriculum on augmentative and alternative communication: Feasibility for implementation.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2279-2293. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13084. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
7
A systematic review of speech, language and communication interventions for children with Down syndrome from 0 to 6 years.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):441-463. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12699. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
8
Deep learning-based eye sign communication system for people with speech impairments.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Jul 20:1-22. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2532698.
10
Child, family and professional views on valued communication outcomes for non-verbal children with neurodisability: A qualitative meta-synthesis.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2946-2984. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13121. Epub 2024 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Reason-Based Recommendations From a Developmental Systems Approach for Students With Needs Across Functional Domains.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2023 Jul 5;54(3):831-840. doi: 10.1044/2023_LSHSS-22-00144. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
2
Reaction time asymmetries provide insight into mechanisms underlying dominant and non-dominant hand selection.
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Oct;240(10):2791-2802. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06451-2. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
The probability of choosing both hands depends on an interaction between motor capacity and limb-specific control in chronic stroke.
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Nov;238(11):2569-2579. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05909-5. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jul 11;13:238. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00238. eCollection 2019.
5
Speech pathologist perspectives on the acceptance versus rejection or abandonment of AAC systems for children with complex communication needs.
Augment Altern Commun. 2019 Sep;35(3):193-204. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2019.1609577. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
6
Is Hand Selection Modulated by Cognitive-perceptual Load?
Neuroscience. 2018 Jan 15;369:363-373. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
Communication Services and Supports for Individuals With Severe Disabilities: Guidance for Assessment and Intervention.
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Mar;121(2):121-38. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-121.2.121.
8
Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 26;9:131. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131. eCollection 2015.
9
Contralesional Arm Preference Depends on Hemisphere of Damage and Target Location in Unilateral Stroke Patients.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Jul;28(6):584-93. doi: 10.1177/1545968314520720. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验