Unit of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, Section of Dentistry, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Department of Biomaterial Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre (TCBC), Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8469090. doi: 10.1155/2017/8469090. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
Orthodontic and periodontal splints are prepared with round or flat metallic wires. As these devices cannot be used in patients with allergy to metals or with aesthetic demands, fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) retainers have been introduced. Stiffness of FRC materials could reduce physiologic tooth movement. In order to lower rigidity of conventional FRC retainers, a modified construction technique that provided a partial (spot) composite coverage of the fiber has been tested and compared with metallic splints and full-bonded FRCs. Flat (Bond-a-Braid, Reliance Orthodontic Products) and round (Penta-one 0155, Masel Orthodontics) stainless steel splints, conventional FRC splints, and experimental spot-bonded FRC retainers (Everstick Ortho, StickTech) were investigated. The strength to bend the retainers at 0.1 mm deflection and at maximum load was measured with a modified Frasaco model. No significant differences were reported among load values of stainless steel wires and experimental spot-bonded FRC retainers at 0.1 mm deflection. Higher strength values were recoded for conventional full-bonded FRCs. At maximum load no significant differences were reported between metallic splints (flat and round) and experimental spot-bonded FRCs, and no significant differences were reported between spot- and full-bonded FRC splints. These results encourage further tests in order to evaluate clinical applications of experimental spot-bonded FRC retainers.
正畸和牙周夹板是用圆形或扁平的金属丝制成的。由于这些装置不能用于对金属过敏或有审美要求的患者,因此引入了纤维增强复合材料(FRC)保持器。FRC 材料的刚度可能会降低生理性牙齿移动。为了降低传统 FRC 保持器的刚性,已经测试并比较了一种改良的构造技术,该技术提供了纤维的部分(点)复合覆盖,与金属夹板和全粘结 FRC 进行比较。扁平(Bond-a-Braid,Reliance Orthodontic Products)和圆形(Penta-one 0155,Masel Orthodontics)不锈钢夹板、传统 FRC 夹板和实验点粘结 FRC 保持器(Everstick Ortho,StickTech)进行了研究。用改良的 Frasaco 模型测量了在 0.1mm 挠度和最大载荷下弯曲保持器的强度。在 0.1mm 挠度处,不锈钢丝和实验点粘结 FRC 保持器的载荷值之间没有显著差异。常规全粘结 FRC 记录了更高的强度值。在最大载荷下,金属夹板(扁平型和圆形)和实验点粘结 FRC 之间没有显著差异,点粘结和全粘结 FRC 夹板之间也没有显著差异。这些结果鼓励进一步测试,以评估实验点粘结 FRC 保持器的临床应用。