Lacquaniti F, Maioli C
Istituto di Fisiologia dei Centri Nervosi, CNR, Milan, Italy.
J Neurosci. 1989 Jan;9(1):149-59. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-01-00149.1989.
We address the problem of whether and how adaptation to suppression of visual information occurs in catching behavior. To this end, subjects were provided with advance information about the height of fall and the mass of a ball and an auditory cue signaled the time of release. Adaptation did occur, as indicated by the unimpaired ability to catch the ball without vision; however, it involved a major reorganization of the muscle responses. The subjects were unable to produce anticipatory activity consistently, but preset the responses elicited by the impact. These responses were more complex and prolonged than those observed in the control experiments (with vision). In particular, medium- and long-latency responses were much larger, and the changes in elbow, wrist, and metacarpophalangeal angles following impact were more oscillatory than in the control. The general pattern of the EMG responses switched from that characteristic of catching with vision to that characteristic of catching without vision from the first trial of each experiment. However, the responses produced without vision were calibrated adaptively in the course of an experiment. In fact, the limb oscillations induced by the impact were significantly larger in the first trial than in the following trials. This seems to suggest that the parameters of the responses are adjusted based on an internal model of the dynamic interaction between the falling ball and the limb. This model is initially constructed from a priori knowledge on impact parameters and is subsequently updated on the basis of the kinesthetic and cutaneous information obtained during the first trial.
我们探讨了在接球行为中是否以及如何发生对视觉信息抑制的适应这一问题。为此,向受试者提供了关于球下落高度和质量的预先信息,并且一个听觉提示信号表示释放时间。适应确实发生了,这表现为在没有视觉的情况下接球能力未受损害;然而,这涉及到肌肉反应的重大重组。受试者无法持续产生预期活动,但预设了由撞击引发的反应。这些反应比在对照实验(有视觉)中观察到的反应更复杂且持续时间更长。特别是,中潜伏期和长潜伏期反应要大得多,并且撞击后肘部、腕部和掌指关节角度的变化比对照实验中的振荡更多。肌电图反应的总体模式从每个实验的第一次试验开始就从有视觉接球的特征转变为无视觉接球的特征。然而,在实验过程中,无视觉产生的反应会进行适应性校准。事实上,撞击引起的肢体振荡在第一次试验中比在随后的试验中明显更大。这似乎表明反应参数是基于下落球与肢体之间动态相互作用的内部模型进行调整的。这个模型最初是根据关于撞击参数的先验知识构建的,随后根据在第一次试验中获得的动觉和皮肤信息进行更新。