Suppr超能文献

印度东部一家大型眼库中,医院角膜获取项目捐赠者与自愿角膜捐赠者之间人类免疫缺陷病毒、乙型肝炎病毒、丙型肝炎病毒和梅毒血清阳性率的比较。

Comparison of seropositivity of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and syphilis among Hospital Cornea Retrieval Programme-Donors versus voluntary cornea donors at a large eye bank in Eastern India.

作者信息

Basak Soham, Basak Samar K, Biswas Bani

机构信息

Department of Cornea and Eye Bank Services, Disha Eye Hospitals, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;65(11):1138-1142. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_472_17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the serology profile of donors from Hospital Cornea Retrieval Programme-donors (HCRP-D) and voluntary cornea donors (VC-D) from a large eye bank in Eastern India.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of donor details from January 2011 to December 2016. Donor demographics, cause of death, and serology reports were compiled. Postmortem blood was tested for human immunodeficiency virus 1 and 2 (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and syphilis using government-approved kits as per the National Programme for Control of Blindness Standards of Eye Banking. Donors for whom serology was not possible were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 4300 of 4353 donors were included of which 74.3% were hospital donors and 25.7% were voluntary donors. A total of 93 (2.2%) donors with 94 seropositive reports were noted: 79 (84.9%) from HCRP-D and 14 (15.1%) from VC-D which was statistically significantly higher (P = 0.02). Among seropositive reports, HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis accounted for 12 (12.8%), 38 (40.4%), 36 (38.3%), and eight (8.5%), respectively. There was no correlation between the cause of death and seropositivity. A statistically significant decreasing trend in seroprevalence among hospital donors was observed over the years (5.3% in 2011 to 1.4% in 2016; P = 0.004). Two (0.47%) of 421 hospital donors with prior negative serology were found to be seropositive.

CONCLUSION

Seropositive rates are significantly higher among hospital donors in spite of medical prescreening compared to nonscreened voluntary donors. Serology should be repeated even when prior reports are available.

摘要

目的

比较印度东部一家大型眼库中来自医院角膜获取项目捐赠者(HCRP - D)和自愿角膜捐赠者(VC - D)的血清学特征。

方法

这是一项对2011年1月至2016年12月捐赠者详细信息的回顾性分析。收集了捐赠者的人口统计学资料、死亡原因和血清学报告。按照国家防盲计划眼库标准,使用政府批准的试剂盒对死后血液进行人类免疫缺陷病毒1型和2型(HIV)、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和梅毒检测。排除无法进行血清学检测的捐赠者。

结果

4353名捐赠者中共有4300名被纳入研究,其中74.3%为医院捐赠者,25.7%为自愿捐赠者。共记录到93名(2.2%)捐赠者有94份血清学阳性报告:79份(84.9%)来自HCRP - D,14份(15.1%)来自VC - D,差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。在血清学阳性报告中,HIV、HBV、HCV和梅毒分别占12份(12.8%)、38份(40.4%)、36份(38.3%)和8份(8.5%)。死亡原因与血清学阳性之间无相关性。多年来观察到医院捐赠者的血清阳性率呈统计学显著下降趋势(2011年为5.3%至2016年为1.4%;P = 0.004)。421名先前血清学检测为阴性的医院捐赠者中有2名(0.47%)被发现血清学呈阳性。

结论

尽管进行了医学预筛查,但与未经筛查的自愿捐赠者相比,医院捐赠者的血清学阳性率显著更高。即使有先前的报告,也应重复进行血清学检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/5700581/38babda31d0b/IJO-65-1138-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验