Suppr超能文献

接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的患者行钬激光前列腺剜除术(HOLEP)的安全性和可行性研究。

Safety and feasibility study of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) on patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

机构信息

Department of Urology, Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Medical School, No 160, PuJian Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 201200, China.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):271-276. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2129-y. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

METHODS

From March 2013 to August 2016, we retrospectively analyzed 1124 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients undergoing HoLEP and divided into four groups: 56 cases receiving DAPT therapy (group A); 72 patients treated with continuous single antiplatelet (AP) therapy (group B); 41 patients treated with single AP therapy but intermittent during preoperative time (group C) and 955 cases had no AP therapy (group D). Patients' baseline characteristics, 1-year clinical outcomes, rates of postoperative bleeding and complications were presented in this study.

RESULTS

All patients received successful operations and no severe postoperative complications occurred. Only one patient in Group D required transfusion. The enucleation time and catheterization time for the DAPT patients were the longest among four groups (p < 0.001, respectively). The overall complications rates within 30 days were 23.2% (13/56) in Group A, 27.8% (20/72) in Group B, 19.5% (8/41) in Group C, and 27.0% (258/955) in Group D, respectively (p = 0.678). By the 12 months, the international prostate symptom scores (IPSS), quality of life scores (QOL) and residual urine volume (RUV) in all groups have been significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

HoLEP in patients receiving DAPT after coronary artery stunting showed similar results to those achieved in patients receiving single AP therapy or non-AP therapy. It can be a good option, which the urologists can offer to those patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia refractory to medical treatment.

摘要

目的

评估接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的患者行钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)的安全性和可行性。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2013 年 3 月至 2016 年 8 月期间行 HoLEP 治疗的 1124 例良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者的临床资料。将患者分为四组:DAPT 治疗组(A 组,56 例);连续单抗血小板(AP)治疗组(B 组,72 例);术前间断单 AP 治疗组(C 组,41 例);无 AP 治疗组(D 组,955 例)。比较四组患者的一般资料、1 年临床疗效、术后出血并发症发生情况。

结果

所有患者均顺利完成手术,无严重术后并发症发生。DAPT 组患者的前列腺剜除时间和导尿管留置时间均长于其他三组(p<0.001)。A、B、C、D 四组患者的术后 30d 内总并发症发生率分别为 23.2%(13/56)、27.8%(20/72)、19.5%(8/41)和 27.0%(258/955),差异无统计学意义(p=0.678)。术后 12 个月,四组患者的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)和残余尿量(RUV)均较术前明显改善。

结论

HoLEP 可用于接受 DAPT 治疗的冠心病患者,疗效与接受单 AP 治疗或非 AP 治疗的患者相似,为临床医生提供了一种新的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验