Suppr超能文献

钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)在高合并症负担的患者中是安全有效的。

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is safe and effective in patients with high comorbidity burden.

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2023 May-Jun;49(3):341-350. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0174.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with high comorbidity burden.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from patients treated with HoLEP at our academic referral center from March 2017 to January 2021 were prospectively collected. Patients were divided according to their CCI (Charlson Comorbidity Index). Perioperative surgical data and 3-month functional outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Out of 305 patients included, 107 (35.1%) and 198 (64.9%) were classified as CCI ≥ 3 and < 3, respectively. The groups were comparable in terms of baseline prostate size, symptoms severity, post-void residue and Qmax. The amount of energy delivered during HoLEP (141.3 vs. 118.0 KJ, p=0.01) and lasing time (38 vs 31 minutes, p=0.01) were significantly higher in patients with CCI ≥ 3. However, median enucleation, morcellation and overall surgical time were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.05). Intraoperative complications rate (9.3% vs. 9.5%, p=0.77), median time to catheter removal and hospital stay were comparable between the two cohorts. Similarly, early (30 days) and delayed (>30 days) surgical complications rates were not significantly different between the two groups. At 3-month follow up, functional outcomes using validated questionnaires did not differ between the two groups (all p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HoLEP represents a safe and effective treatment option for BPH also in patients with high comorbidity burden.

摘要

介绍

我们评估了钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)在高合并症负担患者中的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

前瞻性收集了 2017 年 3 月至 2021 年 1 月在我们学术转诊中心接受 HoLEP 治疗的患者数据。根据 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)将患者分为两组。收集围手术期手术数据和 3 个月的功能结果。

结果

在纳入的 305 例患者中,CCI≥3 和 <3 的患者分别为 107(35.1%)和 198(64.9%)。两组在前列腺大小、症状严重程度、残余尿量和 Qmax 方面基线相似。HoLEP 过程中使用的能量(141.3 与 118.0KJ,p=0.01)和激光时间(38 与 31 分钟,p=0.01)在 CCI≥3 的患者中显著更高。然而,两组之间的平均前列腺剜除、粉碎和总手术时间相当(均 p>0.05)。两组术中并发症发生率(9.3%与 9.5%,p=0.77)、导尿管拔除和住院时间中位数相当。同样,两组之间早期(30 天)和晚期(>30 天)手术并发症发生率无显著差异。在 3 个月的随访中,使用有效问卷评估的功能结果在两组之间没有差异(均 p>0.05)。

结论

HoLEP 是 BPH 的一种安全有效的治疗选择,即使在高合并症负担的患者中也是如此。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
A call for HoLEP: en-bloc vs. two-lobe vs. three-lobe.呼吁行 HoLEP:整块 vs. 两叶 vs. 三叶。
World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2337-2345. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03598-5. Epub 2021 Jan 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验