Chilundo A G, Johansen M V, Pondja A, Miambo R, Afonso S, Mukaratirwa S
Faculty of Veterinary, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
School of Life Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, South Africa.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2018 Mar;50(3):589-601. doi: 10.1007/s11250-017-1474-6. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
A community-based intervention combining health education (HE) and treatment of pigs for control of porcine cysticercosis (PC), gastrointestinal (GI) helminths, African swine fever (ASF) and external parasites was tested involving six villages of resource-poor smallholder pig farmers. Farmers and pigs of six rural villages were randomly allocated into group 1 (HE), which served as controls, and group 2 (HE + OFZ) pigs received a single oral dose of 30 mg/kg OFZ. Farmers were trained in pig health, housing and feeding. The proportion of farmers with confined pigs, the adoption rate of the introduced pig pen, the sero-prevalence of PC and ASF, the prevalence and intensity of GI nematodes and the prevalence of ectoparasites were measured at 9, 15 and 24 months after initiation and compared to a baseline survey to seek the effectiveness of the interventions. There was no clear effect of the intervention on the sero-prevalence of PC, but analysis of the rate of change in prevalence between the two groups showed significant effect with the rate of change to lower prevalence in the HE + OFZ group compared to the HE group. Although HE managed to improve the farmer's knowledge in the control and prevention of ASF and ectoparasites, there was no significant reduction in the sero-prevalence of ASF and the prevalence of ectoparasites throughout the two-year period. The reported ineffectiveness of the intervention in this study suggested that more research is needed to develop more effective methods for controlling PC, ASF and pig parasites.
在六个资源匮乏的小农户村庄中,对一种结合健康教育(HE)和猪治疗措施以控制猪囊尾蚴病(PC)、胃肠道(GI)蠕虫、非洲猪瘟(ASF)和体外寄生虫的社区干预措施进行了测试。六个乡村的农户和猪被随机分为作为对照组的第1组(HE),以及第2组(HE + OFZ),第2组的猪口服了一剂30毫克/千克的氧氟沙星(OFZ)。对农户进行了猪健康、猪舍和饲养方面的培训。在干预开始后的9个月、15个月和24个月,测量了圈养猪的农户比例、引入猪圈的采用率、PC和ASF的血清流行率、GI线虫的流行率和感染强度以及体外寄生虫的流行率,并与基线调查进行比较,以探寻干预措施的有效性。干预措施对PC的血清流行率没有明显影响,但对两组流行率变化率的分析显示,与HE组相比,HE + OFZ组流行率下降的变化率有显著影响。尽管健康教育成功提高了农户在控制和预防ASF及体外寄生虫方面的知识,但在整个两年期间,ASF的血清流行率和体外寄生虫的流行率并没有显著降低。本研究中报告的干预措施无效表明,需要开展更多研究以开发更有效的方法来控制PC、ASF和猪寄生虫。