CU Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):181-191. doi: 10.1177/0363546517739625. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
The effect of patient age or sex on outcomes after osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) has not been assessed.
To determine clinical outcomes for male and female patients aged ≥40 years undergoing OCA compared with a group of patients aged <40 years.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A review of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients who underwent OCA by a single surgeon with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was conducted. The reoperation rate, failure rate, and patient-reported outcome scores were reviewed. All outcomes were compared between patients aged <40 or ≥40 years, with subgroup analyses conducted based on patient sex. Failure was defined as revision OCA, conversion to knee arthroplasty, or gross appearance of graft failure at second-look arthroscopic surgery. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact or chi-square testing, and Mann-Whitney U testing were performed, with P < .05 set as significant.
A total of 170 patients (of 212 eligible patients; 80.2% follow-up) who underwent OCA with a mean follow-up of 5.0 ± 2.7 years (range, 2.0-15.1 years) were included, with 115 patients aged <40 years (mean age, 27.6 ± 7.3 years; 58 male, 57 female) and 55 patients aged ≥40 years (mean age, 44.9 ± 4.0 years; 33 male, 22 female). There were no differences in the number of pre-OCA procedures between the groups ( P = .085). There were no differences in the reoperation rate (<40 years: 38%; ≥40 years: 36%; P = .867), time to reoperation (<40 years: 2.12 ± 1.90 years; ≥40 years: 3.43 ± 3.43 years; P = .126), or failure rate (<40 years: 13%; ≥40 years: 16%; P = .639) between the older and younger groups. Patients in both groups demonstrated significant improvement in Lysholm (both: P < .001), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (both: P < .001), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (both: P < .001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (both: P < .001), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) physical (both: P < .001) scores compared with preoperative values. Patients aged ≥40 years demonstrated significantly higher KOOS symptom ( P = .015) subscores compared with patients aged <40 years. There were no significant differences in the number of complications, outcome scores, or time to failure between the sexes. In patients aged <40 years, female patients experienced failure significantly more quickly than male patients ( P = .039). In contrast, in patients aged ≥40 years, male patients experienced failure significantly more quickly than female patients ( P = .046).
This study provides evidence that OCA is a safe and reliable treatment option for osteochondral defects in patients aged ≥40 years. Male and female patients had similar outcomes. Patients aged <40 years demonstrated lower KOOS symptom subscores postoperatively compared with older patients, potentially attributable to higher expectations of return to function postoperatively as compared with older patients.
患者年龄或性别对软骨下骨异体移植物移植(OCA)后结果的影响尚未评估。
确定与年龄<40 岁的患者相比,≥40 岁的男性和女性患者接受 OCA 的临床结果。
队列研究;证据水平,3 级。
对一名外科医生进行的连续患者前瞻性数据进行了回顾,该外科医生的最低随访时间为 2 年,这些患者接受了 OCA。对再次手术率、失败率和患者报告的结果评分进行了回顾。<40 岁或≥40 岁的患者之间比较了所有结果,并根据患者性别进行了亚组分析。失败定义为翻修 OCA、转换为膝关节置换或在第二次关节镜检查时出现移植物外观失败。进行了描述性统计、Fisher 确切或卡方检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验,P<.05 为差异有统计学意义。
共纳入 170 名患者(212 名符合条件的患者中;80.2%的随访率),平均随访时间为 5.0±2.7 年(范围,2.0-15.1 年),其中 115 名患者年龄<40 岁(平均年龄,27.6±7.3 岁;58 名男性,57 名女性)和 55 名患者年龄≥40 岁(平均年龄,44.9±4.0 岁;33 名男性,22 名女性)。两组之间术前手术次数无差异(P=0.085)。再次手术率(<40 岁:38%;≥40 岁:36%;P=0.867)、再次手术时间(<40 岁:2.12±1.90 年;≥40 岁:3.43±3.43 年;P=0.126)或失败率(<40 岁:13%;≥40 岁:16%;P=0.639)在年龄较大和较小的组之间无差异。两组患者的 Lysholm(均 P<.001)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)(均 P<.001)、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)(均 P<.001)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)(均 P<.001)和简明健康调查问卷 12 项(SF-12)躯体评分(均 P<.001)均较术前显著改善。≥40 岁年龄组患者的 KOOS 症状(P=0.015)亚评分明显高于<40 岁年龄组患者。两组之间的并发症数量、结局评分或失败时间无显著差异。在<40 岁的患者中,女性患者的失败速度明显快于男性患者(P=0.039)。相比之下,在≥40 岁的患者中,男性患者的失败速度明显快于女性患者(P=0.046)。
这项研究提供了证据表明,OCA 是一种安全可靠的治疗≥40 岁患者软骨下骨缺损的方法。男性和女性患者的结果相似。<40 岁的患者术后 KOOS 症状亚评分较低,可能归因于与年龄较大的患者相比,术后对功能恢复的期望较高。