Suppr超能文献

包含完整的 CVLT-II 和 BVMT-R 是否会提高 BICAMS 的性能?来自比利时(荷兰)验证研究的证据。

Does including the full CVLT-II and BVMT-R improve BICAMS? Evidence from a Belgian (Dutch) validation study.

机构信息

Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

出版信息

Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017 Nov;18:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) is a fast, easy-to-administer and already widely validated neuropsychological battery for cognition in multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE

The goals of our study were to validate the BICAMS in a Belgian Dutch-speaking population and to investigate to what extent including extensive versions of two of the three BICAMS subtests improved its psychometric qualities.

METHODS

Ninety-seven persons with MS and ninety-seven healthy controls were included and group-matched on age, education level and gender. All participants performed the BICAMS with an extensive version of the CVLT-II and BVMT-R.

RESULTS

The SDMT and BVMT-R were able to dissociate between the MS and healthy control group, while the CVLT-II was not. Distributions of CVLT-II scores suggest learning effects in the MS group, indicating the need for alternative word lists or the construction of an adapted version fitted for repeated administration. Including the full CVLT-II and BVMT-R did not markedly improve the psychometric qualities of the BICAMS.

CONCLUSION

This study validates the BICAMS in a Belgian Dutch-speaking population and facilitates the use of it in clinical practice, while providing evidence that including full versions of the CVLT-II and BVMT-R does not increase its psychometric qualities markedly.

摘要

背景

简短国际认知评估多发性硬化症(BICAMS)是一种快速、易于管理且已广泛验证的多发性硬化症认知神经心理学测试组合。

目的

我们的研究目的是在比利时荷兰语人群中验证 BICAMS,并探讨纳入三个 BICAMS 子测试中的两个的扩展版本在多大程度上提高了其心理测量质量。

方法

97 名多发性硬化症患者和 97 名健康对照者被纳入并按年龄、教育程度和性别进行组间匹配。所有参与者均进行了 BICAMS 测试,并进行了广泛版本的 CVLT-II 和 BVMT-R 测试。

结果

SDMT 和 BVMT-R 能够区分多发性硬化症组和健康对照组,而 CVLT-II 则不能。CVLT-II 分数的分布表明多发性硬化症组存在学习效应,这表明需要替代单词列表或构建适合重复施测的适应性版本。纳入完整的 CVLT-II 和 BVMT-R 并没有显著提高 BICAMS 的心理测量质量。

结论

本研究在比利时荷兰语人群中验证了 BICAMS,并促进了其在临床实践中的应用,同时提供了证据表明,纳入完整版本的 CVLT-II 和 BVMT-R 并不会显著提高其心理测量质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验