Klein Hadar, Zelicha Hila, Yaskolka Meir Anat, Rinott Ehud, Tsaban Gal, Kaplan Alon, Chassidim Yoash, Gepner Yftach, Blüher Matthias, Ceglarek Uta, Isermann Berend, Stumvoll Michael, Shelef Ilan, Qi Lu, Li Jun, Hu Frank B, Stampfer Meir J, Shai Iris
The Health & Nutrition Innovative International Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 8410501, Israel.
Department of Engineering, Sapir Academic College, Shaar Hanegev, Israel.
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 4;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03891-9.
Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is well established as a pathogenic fat depot, whereas superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) is associated with either an improved or neutral cardiovascular state. However, it is unclear to what extent VAT area (VATcm) and its proportion of total abdominal adipose tissue (VAT%) are distinguished in predicting cardiometabolic status and clinical outcomes during weight loss.
We integrated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements of VAT, deep-SAT, and superficial-SAT from two 18-month lifestyle weight loss clinical trials, CENTRAL and DIRECT PLUS (n = 572).
At baseline, the mean VATcm was 144.8cm and VAT% = 28.2%; over 18 months, participants lost 28cm VATcm (- 22.5%), and 1.3 VAT% units. Baseline VATcm and VAT% were similarly associated with metabolic syndrome, hypertension, and diabetes status, while VAT% better classified hypertriglyceridemia. Conversely, higher VATcm was associated with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), while VAT% was not. After 18 months of lifestyle intervention, both VATcm and VAT% loss were significantly associated with decreased triglycerides, HbA1c, ferritin, and liver enzymes, and increased HDL-c levels beyond weight loss (FDR < 0.05). Only VATcm loss was correlated with decreased HOMA-IR, chemerin, and leptin levels.
MRI follow-up of 572 participants over 18 months of weight loss intervention suggests that although increased VATcm and VAT% exhibit similar clinical manifestations, it might be preferable to examine VAT% when exploring lipid status, while VATcm may better reflect inflammatory and glycemic states.
CENTRAL (Clinical-trials-identifier: NCT01530724); DIRECT PLUS (Clinical-trials-identifier: NCT03020186).
内脏脂肪组织(VAT)已被确认为一种致病脂肪库,而浅表皮下脂肪组织(SAT)与心血管状态改善或呈中性相关。然而,在预测体重减轻期间的心脏代谢状况和临床结局时,VAT面积(VATcm)及其占腹部总脂肪组织的比例(VAT%)在何种程度上有所区别尚不清楚。
我们整合了两项为期18个月的生活方式减重临床试验CENTRAL和DIRECT PLUS(n = 572)中VAT、深部SAT和浅表SAT的磁共振成像(MRI)测量数据。
基线时,平均VATcm为144.8cm,VAT% = 28.2%;在18个月期间,参与者的VATcm减少了28cm(-22.5%),VAT%下降了1.3个单位。基线时,VATcm和VAT%与代谢综合征、高血压和糖尿病状态的相关性相似,而VAT%对高甘油三酯血症的分类效果更好。相反,较高的VATcm与高敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)升高相关,而VAT%则不然。经过18个月的生活方式干预后,VATcm和VAT%的减少均与甘油三酯、糖化血红蛋白、铁蛋白和肝酶水平降低以及高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-c)水平升高显著相关,且超出了体重减轻的影响(FDR < 0.05)。只有VATcm的减少与胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)、chemerin和瘦素水平降低相关。
对572名参与者进行18个月减重干预的MRI随访表明,尽管VATcm和VAT%增加表现出相似的临床表现,但在探究血脂状况时,检查VAT%可能更可取,而VATcm可能更能反映炎症和血糖状态。
CENTRAL(临床试验标识符:NCT01530724);DIRECT PLUS(临床试验标识符:NCT03020186)。