• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剪切波弹性成像在评估肾移植受者同种异体移植纤维化中的应用:一项初步研究。

Utility of Shear Wave Elastography for Assessing Allograft Fibrosis in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Early Heather M, Cheang Ellen C, Aguilera Jorge M, Hirschbein Jonah S W, Fananapazir Ghaneh, Wilson Machelle D, McGahan John P

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Jun;37(6):1455-1465. doi: 10.1002/jum.14487. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1002/jum.14487
PMID:29143363
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of ultrasound-based shear wave elastography (SWE) as a noninvasive method to accurately detect and potentially stage the severity of renal allograft fibrosis and assess its user reproducibility.

METHODS

In this Institutional Review Board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective study, 70 renal transplant recipients underwent an SWE evaluation of their allograft followed directly by biopsy. Two radiologists performed separate SWE measurement acquisitions and the mean, median, and standard deviation of 10 SWE measurements, obtained separately within the cortex and the medulla, were automatically computed. Each patient's SWE results were subsequently compared to their histologic fibrosis scores. The Fisher exact test and univariate logistic regression models were fit to test for associations between the presence of fibrosis (yes/no) as well as categorical SWE results based on the fibrosis severity, ranging from F0 (no fibrosis) to F3 (severe fibrosis), correlating with histologic scores according to the 2007 Banff classification system. Interobserver and intraobserver correlations were also examined.

RESULTS

Our median medulla SWE values reached statistical significance (P = .04) in association with fibrosis. Furthermore, for every unit increase in the median medulla SWE measurement, the odds of fibrosis increased by approximately 20%. No statistical significance was found for mean cortical, median cortical, or mean medullary SWE values (P = .32, .37, and .06, respectively) in association with fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SWE for assessing renal allograft fibrosis is challenging but promising. Further investigation with a larger sample size remains to validate our initial results and establish clinical relevance.

摘要

目的

评估基于超声的剪切波弹性成像(SWE)作为一种无创方法,准确检测肾移植纤维化严重程度并进行潜在分期,以及评估其使用者可重复性的效用。

方法

在这项经机构审查委员会批准、符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》的前瞻性研究中,70例肾移植受者接受了对其移植肾的SWE评估,随后直接进行活检。两名放射科医生分别进行SWE测量采集,并自动计算在皮质和髓质内分别获得的10次SWE测量的平均值、中位数和标准差。随后将每位患者的SWE结果与其组织学纤维化评分进行比较。采用Fisher精确检验和单变量逻辑回归模型,以检验纤维化存在与否以及基于纤维化严重程度的分类SWE结果(范围从F0(无纤维化)到F3(严重纤维化))与根据2007年Banff分类系统的组织学评分之间的关联。还检查了观察者间和观察者内的相关性。

结果

我们的髓质SWE中位数与纤维化相关,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.04)。此外,髓质SWE中位数测量每增加一个单位,纤维化的几率增加约20%。皮质平均、皮质中位数或髓质平均SWE值与纤维化相关均未发现统计学意义(P分别为0.32、0.37和0.06)。

结论

使用SWE评估肾移植纤维化具有挑战性但前景光明。需要更大样本量的进一步研究来验证我们的初步结果并确立临床相关性。

相似文献

1
Utility of Shear Wave Elastography for Assessing Allograft Fibrosis in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study.剪切波弹性成像在评估肾移植受者同种异体移植纤维化中的应用:一项初步研究。
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Jun;37(6):1455-1465. doi: 10.1002/jum.14487. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
2
Prediction of acute rejection in renal allografts using shear-wave dispersion slope.利用剪切波频散斜率预测肾移植急性排斥反应
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul;34(7):4527-4537. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10492-8. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Magnetic resonance elastography vs. point shear wave ultrasound elastography for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction.磁共振弹性成像与点剪切波超声弹性成像在评估肾移植功能障碍中的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108949. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108949. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
ARFI-based tissue elasticity quantification and kidney graft dysfunction: first clinical experiences.基于声辐射力脉冲成像的组织弹性定量分析与移植肾失功:初步临床经验
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011;49(1-4):527-35. doi: 10.3233/CH-2011-1503.
5
Non-invasive assessment of kidney allograft fibrosis with shear wave elastography: A radiological-pathological correlation analysis.利用剪切波弹性成像技术对肾移植纤维化进行无创评估:放射学与病理学相关性分析。
Int J Urol. 2018 May;25(5):450-455. doi: 10.1111/iju.13536. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
6
Challenges and Considerations When Using Shear Wave Elastography to Evaluate the Transplanted Kidney, With Pictorial Review.使用剪切波弹性成像评估移植肾的挑战与注意事项,并附图片回顾
J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Sep;36(9):1771-1782. doi: 10.1002/jum.14217. Epub 2017 May 4.
7
Role of Magnetic Resonance Elastography as a Noninvasive Measurement Tool of Fibrosis in a Renal Allograft: A Case Report.磁共振弹性成像作为肾移植中纤维化无创测量工具的作用:一例报告
Transplant Proc. 2017 Sep;49(7):1555-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.04.002.
8
Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.用于肝脏疾病的超声剪切波弹性成像:对该领域众多参与者的批判性评估
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Feb;37(1):1-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1567037. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
9
Performance of 2-Dimensional Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography in Liver Fibrosis Detection Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography as the Reference Standard: A Pilot Study.以磁共振弹性成像为参考标准评估二维超声剪切波弹性成像在肝纤维化检测中的性能:一项初步研究。
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Feb;35(2):401-12. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.03036. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
10
Usefulness of Multiparametric Ultrasound for Evaluating Structural Abnormality of Transplanted Kidney: Can We Predict Histologic Abnormality on Renal Biopsy in Advance?多参数超声评估移植肾结构异常的实用性:我们能否提前预测肾活检的组织学异常?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Sep;209(3):W139-W144. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17397. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Using an Interpretable Model Based on Shear-Wave Elastography.使用基于剪切波弹性成像的可解释模型预测肾移植受者的不良结局
Kidney Dis (Basel). 2025 May 16;11(1):469-481. doi: 10.1159/000546396. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Role of multi-parametric ultrasonography for the assessment and monitoring of functional status of renal allografts with histopathological correlation.多参数超声检查在评估和监测肾移植功能状态及与组织病理学相关性方面的作用
World J Radiol. 2024 Dec 28;16(12):782-793. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i12.782.
3
Native T mapping-based radiomics diagnosis of kidney function and renal fibrosis in chronic kidney disease.
基于T值映射的慢性肾脏病肾功能及肾纤维化的影像组学诊断
iScience. 2024 Jul 14;27(8):110493. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110493. eCollection 2024 Aug 16.
4
Comparison of resistive index and shear-wave elastography in the evaluation of chronic kidney allograft dysfunction.电阻抗指数与剪切波弹性成像在评估慢性肾移植功能障碍中的比较。
World J Transplant. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):89255. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.89255.
5
Evaluation of Robustness of S-Transform Based Phase Velocity Estimation in Viscoelastic Phantoms and Renal Transplants.基于 S-变换的粘弹性仿体和肾移植相位速度估计稳健性评估。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024 Mar;71(3):954-966. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2023.3323983. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
Shear wave elastography parameters adds prognostic value to adverse outcome in kidney transplantation recipients.剪切波弹性成像参数为肾移植受者不良结局增加预后价值。
Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2235015. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2235015.
7
Ultrasound elastography in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.超声弹性成像在慢性肾脏病中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2023 Jul;50(3):381-415. doi: 10.1007/s10396-023-01304-z. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
8
Ultrasound shear wave elastography for the evaluation of renal pathological changes in adult patients.超声剪切波弹性成像评估成人患者肾脏病变。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Mar 1;96(1144):20220288. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220288. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
9
Importance of Confounding Factors in the Evaluation of Surrogate Measures for Kidney Transplant Fibrosis.混杂因素在肾移植纤维化替代指标评估中的重要性。
Kidney360. 2022 Nov 24;3(11):1829-1830. doi: 10.34067/KID.0005852022.
10
Quantitative ultrasound for non-invasive evaluation of subclinical rejection in renal transplantation.定量超声用于肾移植亚临床排斥反应的无创评估。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr;33(4):2367-2377. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09260-x. Epub 2022 Nov 23.