LMU Center for Leadership and People Management.
Department of Social Psychology, LMU Munich.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Jul;23(3):417-427. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000094. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
Workflow interruptions are one of the most commonly experienced stressors at work. This research expands existing literature on workflow interruptions in a diary field study. We apply a within-person approach and investigate detrimental effects of daily workflow interruptions on both daily satisfaction with performance and daily emotional exhaustion. Furthermore, we introduce polychronicity (the trait-like preference of a person to deal with several activities at the same time) as a buffering factor in this relationship. Results of the diary study with knowledge workers over 5 consecutive working days (N = 149, 644 daily observations) showed that on days on which participants experienced a large amount of workflow interruptions, they reported lower levels of satisfaction with their performance and higher levels of emotional exhaustion on that same day. Polychronicity failed to moderate the positive association between interruptions and emotional exhaustion. However, polychronicity significantly moderated the negative association between daily interruptions and daily satisfaction with participants' own performance in a way that for people ranking high on polychronicity this negative association was dissolved. (PsycINFO Database Record
工作流程中断是工作中最常经历的压力源之一。这项研究在日记实地研究中扩展了关于工作流程中断的现有文献。我们采用个体内方法,调查了每日工作流程中断对日常绩效满意度和日常情绪耗竭的不利影响。此外,我们将多任务处理(一个人同时处理多项活动的特质倾向)作为这种关系的缓冲因素引入。在连续 5 个工作日内对知识工作者进行的日记研究(N=149,644 个每日观察)结果表明,在参与者经历大量工作流程中断的日子里,他们报告说当天对自己的表现满意度较低,情绪疲惫感较高。多任务处理并不能调节中断与情绪疲惫之间的正相关关系。然而,多任务处理显著调节了日常中断与参与者对自己表现的日常满意度之间的负相关关系,表现为在多任务处理得分较高的人群中,这种负相关关系消失了。