Ozaki Akihiko, Tsubokura Masaharu, Leppold Claire, Sawano Toyoaki, Tsukada Manabu, Nemoto Tsuyoshi, Kosugi Kazuhiro, Nishikawa Yoshitaka, Kato Shigeaki, Ohira Hiromichi
aDepartment of Surgery, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Fukushima, Japan bTeikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan cDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soma Central Hospital, Soma, Fukushima, Japan dGlobal Public Health Unit, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK eDepartment of Research, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Fukushima, Japan fDepartment of Home Medical Care, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Minamisoma, Fukushima, Japan gDepartment of Palliative Care, Kawasaki Municipal Ida Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan hDepartment of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan iResearch Institute of Innovative Medicine (RIIM), Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(46):e8721. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008721.
The primary setting of palliative care has shifted from inpatient care to patients' residences. Family caregiving is essential for patients with life-limiting illnesses to receive palliative care at home, however little information is available regarding potential interventions to achieve palliative homecare for those without sufficient support from family members in various settings, including disasters.
In March 2011, Fukushima, Japan experienced an earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster. In August 2015, a 59-year-old Japanese female presented to our hospital, located 23 km north of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, with a right breast ulcer.
The patient was diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer.
The patient's general condition gradually worsened despite a one-year course of chemotherapy, and she became bedridden after a fall in October 2016. Although the patient wished to receive palliative homecare, this appeared challenging to achieve because she resided alone in a temporary housing shelter. Although she originally lived with her family in Odaka District, Fukushima, she relocated outside of the city following evacuation orders after the disaster. The evacuation orders for Odaka District were still in effect when she returned to the city alone in 2014. We contacted her sister who moved apart from her during the evacuation, and explained the necessity of family caregiving to enable her palliative homecare.
The sister decided to move back to their original residence in Odaka District and live with the patient again. The patient successfully spent her end-of-life period and died at home.
Health care providers and community health workers may need to take a pro-active approach to communicating with family members to draw informal support to enable patients' end-of-life management according to their values and preferences. This is a lesson which may be applicable to broader healthcare settings beyond cancer, or disaster contexts, considering that population ageing and social isolation may continue to advance worldwide.
姑息治疗的主要场所已从住院治疗转向患者家中。家庭照护对于患有危及生命疾病的患者在家中接受姑息治疗至关重要,然而,对于在包括灾难在内的各种情况下,那些没有足够家庭成员支持的患者,关于实现姑息家庭照护的潜在干预措施的信息却很少。
2011年3月,日本福岛发生了地震、海啸和核灾难。2015年8月,一名59岁的日本女性因右乳溃疡来到我院,我院位于福岛第一核电站以北23公里处。
该患者被诊断为IV期乳腺癌。
尽管接受了一年的化疗,但患者的总体状况逐渐恶化,2016年10月跌倒后卧床不起。尽管患者希望接受姑息家庭照护,但由于她独自居住在临时住房中,这似乎很难实现。她原本与家人住在福岛县小高町,但灾难发生后,她根据疏散命令搬到了城外。2014年她独自回到城里时,小高町的疏散命令仍然有效。我们联系了在疏散期间与她分开的妹妹,并解释了家庭照护对于实现她的姑息家庭照护的必要性。
妹妹决定搬回他们在小高町的原住所,再次与患者同住。患者成功度过了生命的最后阶段,在家中去世。
医疗保健提供者和社区卫生工作者可能需要采取积极主动的方式与家庭成员沟通,以获得非正式支持,从而根据患者的价值观和偏好进行临终管理。考虑到全球人口老龄化和社会隔离可能会继续加剧,这一经验教训可能适用于癌症以外更广泛的医疗环境或灾难情况。