• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腘动脉至远端旁路联合股腘动脉血管腔内治疗严重肢体缺血的疗效

Outcomes of Popliteal-To-Distal Bypass Combined with Femoropopliteal Artery Endovascular Treatment for Critical Limb Ischemia.

作者信息

Tsuji Yoshihiko, Kitano Ikuro, Sugimoto Koji

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Shinsuma General Hospital, Kobe,Hyogo, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe,Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Dis. 2017 Sep 25;10(3):223-8. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.17-00049.

DOI:10.3400/avd.oa.17-00049
PMID:29147165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5684164/
Abstract

: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of combined popliteal-to-distal bypass and endovascular treatment (EVT) for femoropopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). : We reviewed data of 14 CLI patients who were treated by popliteal-to-distal bypass combined with femoropopliteal EVT. The femoropopliteal lesions included 3 TASC II-A, 8 TASC II-B, and 3TASC II-C but no TASC II-D, and balloon dilatation was performed in 9 cases and a stent was placed in 5 cases. The saphenous vein graft was used in all bypasses, and the target arteries were the dorsalis pedis artery in 12 cases and the posterior tibial artery in 2 cases. : At 12 and 24 months, primary patency rates were both 79%, primary assisted and secondary patency rates were both 93%, limb salvage rates were both 93%, and survival rates were 92% and 84%, respectively. Restenosis after femoropopliteal EVT occurred in 2 cases, and both were successfully revised by additional endovascular balloon dilatation. : Combined popliteal-to-distal bypass and femoropopliteal EVT might be a useful therapeutic option for appropriately selected CLI patients. Intensive follow-up for endovascular treated lesions and vein graft is mandatory.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估腘动脉至远端旁路移植术联合血管内治疗(EVT)对严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者股腘动脉病变的治疗效果。我们回顾了14例接受腘动脉至远端旁路移植术联合股腘动脉EVT治疗的CLI患者的数据。股腘动脉病变包括3例TASC II - A、8例TASC II - B和3例TASC II - C,但无TASC II - D,其中9例行球囊扩张,5例行支架置入。所有旁路移植均采用大隐静脉,12例的靶动脉为足背动脉,2例为胫后动脉。在12个月和24个月时,一期通畅率均为79%,一期辅助通畅率和二期通畅率均为93%,肢体挽救率均为93%,生存率分别为92%和84%。股腘动脉EVT术后2例发生再狭窄,均通过再次血管内球囊扩张成功修复。腘动脉至远端旁路移植术联合股腘动脉EVT可能是适合的CLI患者的一种有效治疗选择。对血管内治疗的病变和静脉移植物进行密切随访是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efca/5684164/3be50cbe0eab/avd-10-3-oa.17-00049-figure03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efca/5684164/cfe635901c89/avd-10-3-oa.17-00049-figure01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efca/5684164/dc71d2ead8c4/avd-10-3-oa.17-00049-figure02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efca/5684164/3be50cbe0eab/avd-10-3-oa.17-00049-figure03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efca/5684164/cfe635901c89/avd-10-3-oa.17-00049-figure01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efca/5684164/dc71d2ead8c4/avd-10-3-oa.17-00049-figure02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efca/5684164/3be50cbe0eab/avd-10-3-oa.17-00049-figure03.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Popliteal-To-Distal Bypass Combined with Femoropopliteal Artery Endovascular Treatment for Critical Limb Ischemia.腘动脉至远端旁路联合股腘动脉血管腔内治疗严重肢体缺血的疗效
Ann Vasc Dis. 2017 Sep 25;10(3):223-8. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.17-00049.
2
Comparison of Endovascular Versus Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal TASC II D Lesions: A Single-Center Study.股腘动脉TASC II D型病变的血管内治疗与旁路手术比较:一项单中心研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;47:179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
Mid-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for TASC-II D Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease with Critical Limb Ischemia.腔内治疗 TASC-II D 型股腘动脉闭塞性病变合并严重肢体缺血的中期结果。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Mar;39(3):344-52. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1175-3. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
4
Mid-term outcomes of endovascular treatment and risk factors for recurrence in patients with Trans-Atlantic-Inter-Society II C/D femoropopliteal lesions.跨大西洋跨学会共识II C/D型股腘动脉病变患者血管内治疗的中期结果及复发危险因素
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 May;11(5):2028-2039. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-221.
5
Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy for TASC II D Femoropopliteal Lesions with Critical Limb Ischemia: A Retrospective Analysis.腔内治疗伴有严重肢体缺血的 TASC II D 型股腘动脉病变的中期结果:一项回顾性分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;88:182-190. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
6
The success of endovascular therapy for all TransAtlantic Society Consensus graded femoropopliteal lesions.针对所有经跨大西洋协作组分级的股腘动脉病变进行血管内治疗的成功率。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;25(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
7
Intermediate results of percutaneous endovascular therapy of femoropopliteal occlusive disease: a contemporary series.股腘动脉闭塞性疾病经皮血管腔内治疗的中期结果:当代系列研究
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Oct;44(4):762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.025.
8
Clinical follow-up in endovascular treatment for TASC C-D lesions in femoro-popliteal segment.股腘段TASC C-D级病变血管内治疗的临床随访
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr 1;73(5):701-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21971.
9
Cryoplasty as endovascular treatment in the femoropopliteal region: hemodynamic results and follow-up at one year.冷冻球囊血管成形术用于股腘动脉区域的血管内治疗:血流动力学结果及一年随访
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jul;24(5):680-5. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.08.021. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
10
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Endovascular Therapy with Self-Expandable Nitinol Stent and Femoral-Popliteal Bypass for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C and D Femoropopliteal Lesions.自膨式镍钛合金支架血管内治疗与股腘动脉旁路移植术治疗跨大西洋两岸血管外科学会(TASC)II C型和D型股腘动脉病变的临床结局比较
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 May;57:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.09.024. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Endovascular treatment for chronic total occlusion of superficial femoral artery: Is retrograde approach from popliteal artery effective and safe?股浅动脉慢性完全闭塞的血管内治疗:经腘动脉逆行入路是否有效且安全?
Radiol Case Rep. 2020 Sep 3;15(11):2116-2119. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.08.029. eCollection 2020 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of the Japanese multicenter Viabahn trial of endovascular stent grafting for superficial femoral artery lesions.日本多中心股浅动脉病变血管内支架植入Viabahn试验的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jul;66(1):130-142.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.065. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
2
Durable Clinical Effectiveness With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: 5-Year Results of the Zilver PTX Randomized Trial.紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗股腘动脉的持久临床疗效:Zilver PTX随机试验的5年结果
Circulation. 2016 Apr 12;133(15):1472-83; discussion 1483. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016900. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
3
One-year outcomes of the U.S. and Japanese regulatory trial of the Misago stent for treatment of superficial femoral artery disease (OSPREY study).
美佐戈支架治疗股浅动脉疾病的美国和日本监管试验的一年期结果(OSPREY研究)。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb;63(2):370-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.093. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
4
Combining superficial femoral artery endovascular treatment with distal vein bypass.股浅动脉腔内治疗联合远端静脉搭桥术。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Jun;56(3):383-91. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
5
Heparin-bonded stent-graft for the treatment of TASC II C and D femoropopliteal lesions: the Viabahn-25 cm trial.用于治疗TASC II C型和D型股腘病变的肝素结合型覆膜支架:Viabahn-25 cm试验
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Dec;21(6):765-74. doi: 10.1583/14-4790R.1.
6
Incidence, predictors, and prognosis of in-stent occlusion after endovascular treatment with nitinol stents for femoropopliteal lesions.镍钛诺支架血管腔内治疗股腘动脉病变后支架内闭塞的发生率、预测因素及预后
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):1009-1015.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.050. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
7
Heparin-bonded covered stents versus bare-metal stents for complex femoropopliteal artery lesions: the randomized VIASTAR trial (Viabahn endoprosthesis with PROPATEN bioactive surface [VIA] versus bare nitinol stent in the treatment of long lesions in superficial femoral artery occlusive disease).肝素结合涂层支架与裸金属支架治疗复杂股腘动脉病变的随机对照试验(Viabahn 覆膜支架联合 PROPATEN 生物活性表面[VIA]与裸钽支架治疗股浅动脉闭塞性疾病长段病变的疗效比较[VIASTAR 试验])。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 8;62(15):1320-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.079. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
8
Examination of Difference in the Proximal Anastomotic Site for Crus, Ankle Bypass: Common Femoral Artery vs Below the Knee Popliteal Artery.股腘动脉转流术中近端吻合部位差异的研究:股总动脉与膝下腘动脉对比
Ann Vasc Dis. 2012;5(1):30-5. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.10.00007. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
9
Long-term outcomes and risk stratification of patency following nitinol stenting in the femoropopliteal segment: retrospective multicenter analysis.镍钛诺支架置入治疗股腘段后通畅率的长期结果和风险分层:回顾性多中心分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Dec;18(6):753-61. doi: 10.1583/11-3581.1.
10
Outcomes of combined superficial femoral endovascular revascularization and popliteal to distal bypass for patients with tissue loss.股浅动脉腔内血管重建术联合腘动脉至远端旁路移植术治疗组织缺损患者的疗效
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):366-71. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.016.