Khan Luluel, Zeng Liang, Cella David, Thavarajah Nemica, Chen Emily, Zhang Liying, Bennett Margaret, Peckham Kenneth, De Costa Sandra, Beaumont Jennifer L, Tsao May, Danjoux Cyril, Barnes Elizabeth, Sahgal Arjun, Chow Edward
Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
World J Oncol. 2012 Oct;3(5):210-216. doi: 10.4021/wjon578w. Epub 2012 Oct 28.
To examine the agreement of Health Care Providers (HCPs) and patients' evaluation of quality of life on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness therapy - Palliative care module (FACIT-Pal) scale.
Sixty advanced cancer patients and fifty-six health care providers involved in their care at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre completed a modified version of the FACIT- Pal. In the survey, patients and HCPs indicated the 10 top issues affecting the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer most profoundly. The percentage of participants selecting each item as one of their 10 most relevant items was calculated in HCPs and patients.
There were differences in relative rankings of QOL issues among patients and HCPs. Among the top 10 items which were identified from both patients and HCPs, there were differences in the rankings. Patients ranked emotional support from family (40.9%) as most important followed by pain (38.6%), lack of energy (31.8%) and able to enjoy life (29.6%). HCPs ranked in the following order: pain (73.2%), lack of energy (63.4%), nausea (51.2%) and dyspnea (51.2%) whereas patients rated nausea at 18.2 % and dyspnea at 9.09%.
There is a discrepancy between scores of patients and HCPs as they may prioritize differently. HCPs tended to put more emphasis on physical symptoms, whereas patients had emotional and global issues as priorities.
探讨医疗服务提供者(HCPs)与患者对慢性病治疗功能评估 - 姑息治疗模块(FACIT - Pal)量表中生活质量评估的一致性。
60名晚期癌症患者和56名参与其在森尼布鲁克健康科学中心护理的医疗服务提供者完成了FACIT - Pal的修订版。在调查中,患者和HCPs指出了对晚期癌症患者生活质量影响最深远的10个首要问题。计算了HCPs和患者中选择每个项目作为其10个最相关项目之一的参与者百分比。
患者和HCPs对生活质量问题的相对排名存在差异。在患者和HCPs都确定的前10个项目中,排名存在差异。患者将来自家人的情感支持(40.9%)列为最重要的,其次是疼痛(38.6%)、缺乏精力(31.8%)和能够享受生活(29.6%)。HCPs的排名顺序如下:疼痛(73.2%)、缺乏精力(63.4%)、恶心(51.2%)和呼吸困难(51.2%),而患者将恶心评为18.2%,将呼吸困难评为9.09%。
患者和HCPs的评分存在差异,因为他们可能有不同的优先顺序。HCPs倾向于更强调身体症状,而患者则将情感和整体问题作为优先事项。