• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patients' and Health Care Providers' Evaluation of Quality of Life Issues in Advanced Cancer Using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative Care Module (FACIT-Pal) Scale.使用慢性病治疗功能评估-姑息治疗模块(FACIT-Pal)量表对晚期癌症患者及医疗服务提供者的生活质量问题评估
World J Oncol. 2012 Oct;3(5):210-216. doi: 10.4021/wjon578w. Epub 2012 Oct 28.
2
Preliminary results of the generation of a shortened quality-of-life assessment for patients with advanced cancer: the FACIT-Pal-14.晚期癌症患者简明生活质量评估量表的生成:FACIT-Pal-14 的初步结果。
J Palliat Med. 2013 May;16(5):509-15. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0595. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative Care (FACIT-Pal) in Patients With Advanced Cancer.中文版慢性疾病治疗功能评估-姑息治疗量表(FACIT-Pal)在晚期癌症患者中的心理测量特性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Jan;67(1):e8-e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.09.020. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
4
A psychometric evaluation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-palliative care (FACIT-Pal) scale with palliative care samples in three African countries.对慢性病治疗-姑息治疗功能评估量表(FACIT-Pal)在三个非洲国家姑息治疗样本中的心理测量学评价。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Nov;48(5):983-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
5
Comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Pal for assessment of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 与 FACIT-Pal 在评估晚期癌症患者生活质量中的比较。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Oct;11(5):541-7. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.64.
6
Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative care (FACIT-Pal) scale.慢性病治疗-姑息治疗功能评估量表(FACIT-Pal)的信度和效度
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jan;37(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.015. Epub 2008 May 27.
7
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the FACIT-PAL Quality of Life Instrument.土耳其版 FACIT-PAL 生活质量量表的信度和效度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Aug;58(2):297-305.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 May 13.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Tagalog Version of the FACIT-Pal-14 Instrument in Measuring the Quality of Life of Filipino Cancer Patients.FACIT-Pal-14量表他加禄语版本在测量菲律宾癌症患者生活质量方面的信度和效度
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Jun 14;58(10):5-13. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.7804. eCollection 2024.
9
Questionnaires measuring quality of life and satisfaction of patients and their relatives in a palliative care setting-German translation of FAMCARE-2 and the palliative care subscale of FACIT-Pal.在姑息治疗环境中测量患者及其亲属生活质量和满意度的问卷——FAMCARE-2的德语翻译及FACIT-Pal的姑息治疗子量表
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;7(4):420-426. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.03.17. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
10
Comparison of three shortened questionnaires for assessment of quality of life in advanced cancer.三种用于评估晚期癌症患者生活质量的简化问卷的比较。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Aug;17(8):918-23. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0012. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Spanish Versions of FACIT-PAL and FACIT-PAL-14 in Palliative Patients.中文版癌症患者 FACIT-PAL 量表和 FACIT-PAL-14 量表的验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710731.

本文引用的文献

1
Distress management.应激管理
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Apr;8(4):448-85. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0034.
2
Patients' and health care professionals' evaluation of health-related quality of life issues in bone metastases.患者与医护人员对骨转移中与健康相关的生活质量问题的评估。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Sep;45(14):2510-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.05.024. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
3
Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative care (FACIT-Pal) scale.慢性病治疗-姑息治疗功能评估量表(FACIT-Pal)的信度和效度
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jan;37(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.015. Epub 2008 May 27.
4
Assessing health-related quality of life in palliative care: comparing patient and physician assessments.评估姑息治疗中与健康相关的生活质量:比较患者和医生的评估。
Eur J Cancer. 2006 May;42(8):1159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.01.032. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
5
Emotional distress: the sixth vital sign--future directions in cancer care.情绪困扰:第六生命体征——癌症护理的未来方向
Psychooncology. 2006 Feb;15(2):93-5. doi: 10.1002/pon.1022.
6
Quality of life from a patient's perspective: can we believe the patient?
Curr Probl Cancer. 2005 Nov-Dec;29(6):326-31. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2005.09.007.
7
Screening for depression in medical care: pitfalls, alternatives, and revised priorities.医疗保健中的抑郁症筛查:陷阱、替代方法及修订后的优先事项。
J Psychosom Res. 2003 Apr;54(4):279-87. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00640-2.
8
How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients' and oncologists' preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues.你感觉如何?谁想知道?患者与肿瘤学家对于讨论健康相关生活质量问题的偏好。
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Sep 15;18(18):3295-301. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.18.3295.
9
Cancer patients as 'experts' in defining quality of life domains. A multicentre survey by the Italian Group for the Evaluation of Outcomes in Oncology (IGEO).癌症患者作为定义生活质量领域的“专家”。意大利肿瘤学结局评估小组(IGEO)的一项多中心调查。
Qual Life Res. 2000 Mar;9(2):151-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1008967104082.
10
Can professionals improve their assessments?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1998 Mar;15(3):149-50. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(97)00350-3.

使用慢性病治疗功能评估-姑息治疗模块(FACIT-Pal)量表对晚期癌症患者及医疗服务提供者的生活质量问题评估

Patients' and Health Care Providers' Evaluation of Quality of Life Issues in Advanced Cancer Using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative Care Module (FACIT-Pal) Scale.

作者信息

Khan Luluel, Zeng Liang, Cella David, Thavarajah Nemica, Chen Emily, Zhang Liying, Bennett Margaret, Peckham Kenneth, De Costa Sandra, Beaumont Jennifer L, Tsao May, Danjoux Cyril, Barnes Elizabeth, Sahgal Arjun, Chow Edward

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

World J Oncol. 2012 Oct;3(5):210-216. doi: 10.4021/wjon578w. Epub 2012 Oct 28.

DOI:10.4021/wjon578w
PMID:29147308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5649898/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To examine the agreement of Health Care Providers (HCPs) and patients' evaluation of quality of life on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness therapy - Palliative care module (FACIT-Pal) scale.

METHODS

Sixty advanced cancer patients and fifty-six health care providers involved in their care at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre completed a modified version of the FACIT- Pal. In the survey, patients and HCPs indicated the 10 top issues affecting the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer most profoundly. The percentage of participants selecting each item as one of their 10 most relevant items was calculated in HCPs and patients.

RESULTS

There were differences in relative rankings of QOL issues among patients and HCPs. Among the top 10 items which were identified from both patients and HCPs, there were differences in the rankings. Patients ranked emotional support from family (40.9%) as most important followed by pain (38.6%), lack of energy (31.8%) and able to enjoy life (29.6%). HCPs ranked in the following order: pain (73.2%), lack of energy (63.4%), nausea (51.2%) and dyspnea (51.2%) whereas patients rated nausea at 18.2 % and dyspnea at 9.09%.

CONCLUSION

There is a discrepancy between scores of patients and HCPs as they may prioritize differently. HCPs tended to put more emphasis on physical symptoms, whereas patients had emotional and global issues as priorities.

摘要

背景

探讨医疗服务提供者(HCPs)与患者对慢性病治疗功能评估 - 姑息治疗模块(FACIT - Pal)量表中生活质量评估的一致性。

方法

60名晚期癌症患者和56名参与其在森尼布鲁克健康科学中心护理的医疗服务提供者完成了FACIT - Pal的修订版。在调查中,患者和HCPs指出了对晚期癌症患者生活质量影响最深远的10个首要问题。计算了HCPs和患者中选择每个项目作为其10个最相关项目之一的参与者百分比。

结果

患者和HCPs对生活质量问题的相对排名存在差异。在患者和HCPs都确定的前10个项目中,排名存在差异。患者将来自家人的情感支持(40.9%)列为最重要的,其次是疼痛(38.6%)、缺乏精力(31.8%)和能够享受生活(29.6%)。HCPs的排名顺序如下:疼痛(73.2%)、缺乏精力(63.4%)、恶心(51.2%)和呼吸困难(51.2%),而患者将恶心评为18.2%,将呼吸困难评为9.09%。

结论

患者和HCPs的评分存在差异,因为他们可能有不同的优先顺序。HCPs倾向于更强调身体症状,而患者则将情感和整体问题作为优先事项。