Suppr超能文献

癌症患者作为定义生活质量领域的“专家”。意大利肿瘤学结局评估小组(IGEO)的一项多中心调查。

Cancer patients as 'experts' in defining quality of life domains. A multicentre survey by the Italian Group for the Evaluation of Outcomes in Oncology (IGEO).

作者信息

Costantini M, Mencaglia E, Giulio P D, Cortesi E, Roila F, Ballatori E, Tamburini M, Casali P, Licitra L, Candis D D, Massidda B, Luzzani M, Campora E, Placido S D, Palmeri S, Angela P M, Baracco G, Gareri R, Martignetti A, Ragosa S, Zoda L, Ionta M T, Bulletti S, Pastore L

机构信息

Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trials, National Cancer Institute, Genoa.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2000 Mar;9(2):151-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1008967104082.

Abstract

Although the subjective nature of quality of life is generally accepted, less attention has been paid to the procedure of selecting domains to be explored with questionnaires. To explore what contributes to cancer patients' quality of life, a survey was conducted with the aim of identifying contents of quality of life using cancer patients as 'experts'. A questionnaire with open-ended items aimed at exploring the meaning of quality of life and at determining the contents of health and not health related quality of life, was submitted to a sample of cancer patients stratified by residence, cancer site and stage of disease. The 248 questionnaires received were transcribed and broken down into phrases to allow coding. A content analysis was performed, using as a conceptual framework, the domains identified by the Italian Society of Psycho-Oncology. Overall, 43 domains and a list of symptoms were identified. The two most frequently reported symptoms were pain (21.4% patients) and fatigue (14.1% patients). Social relationships and psychological domains were heavily represented. Twenty sub-domains related to the domain 'psychological well-being'. This study suggests that information on the content of quality of life questionnaires to be submitted to people affected by a specific disease, should be derived by studying people suffering the specific disease. These results reinforce the criticism that available quality of life instruments are more likely to reflect the perspective of health professionals than patients.

摘要

尽管生活质量的主观性已得到普遍认可,但对于通过问卷调查来选择待探索领域的过程却较少受到关注。为了探究哪些因素对癌症患者的生活质量有影响,我们进行了一项调查,旨在以癌症患者为“专家”来确定生活质量的内容。一份包含开放式问题的问卷被发放给按居住地、癌症部位和疾病阶段分层的癌症患者样本,该问卷旨在探究生活质量的含义,并确定与健康及非健康相关的生活质量内容。回收的248份问卷被转录并拆分成短语以便编码。我们以意大利心理肿瘤学会确定的领域为概念框架进行了内容分析。总体而言,共识别出43个领域和一份症状清单。报告频率最高的两种症状是疼痛(21.4%的患者)和疲劳(14.1%的患者)。社会关系和心理领域占比很大。与“心理健康”领域相关的子领域有20个。这项研究表明,关于向特定疾病患者发放的生活质量问卷内容的信息,应该通过研究患有该特定疾病的人群来获取。这些结果强化了一种批评观点,即现有的生活质量测评工具更有可能反映健康专业人员的观点而非患者的观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验