Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cordoba University, Cordoba, Spain.
Mod Pathol. 2018 Jan;31(1):24-38. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.104. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
Approximately one-half of advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanomas harbor a mutation in the BRAF gene, with V600E being the most common mutation. Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors is associated with significant long-term treatment benefit in patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. Therefore, molecular testing for BRAF mutations is a priority in determining the course of therapy. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed and scientific congress databases using the terms 'BRAF,' 'mutation,' and 'cancer/tumor.' These results were filtered to include manuscripts that focused on diagnostic tests for determining BRAF mutation status. Numerous BRAF testing methods were identified, including DNA-based companion diagnostic tests and DNA- and protein-based laboratory-developed tests. Herein we review the characteristics of each method and highlight the strengths and weaknesses that should be considered before use and when interpreting results for each patient. Molecular profiling has shown that mutation load increases with melanoma tumor progression and that unique patterns of genetic changes and evolutionary trajectories for different melanoma subtypes can occur. Discordance in the BRAF mutational status between primary and metastatic lesions, as well as intratumoral heterogeneity, is known to occur. Additionally, the development of acquired resistance to combination BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy is still a formidable obstacle. Therefore, tumor heterogeneity and the development of acquired resistance have important implications for molecular testing and ultimately the treatment of patients with advanced-stage melanoma. Overall, this information may help community oncologists more accurately and effectively interpret results of diagnostic tests within the context of recent data characterizing melanoma tumor progression.
大约一半的晚期(不可切除或转移性)黑色素瘤存在 BRAF 基因突变,其中 V600E 是最常见的突变。BRAF 和 MEK 抑制剂的靶向治疗与 BRAF V600 突变黑色素瘤患者的长期治疗获益显著相关。因此,BRAF 突变的分子检测是确定治疗方案的首要任务。使用 MEDLINE/PubMed 和科学大会数据库,使用术语“BRAF”、“突变”和“癌症/肿瘤”进行文献检索。对这些结果进行了过滤,以纳入专注于确定 BRAF 突变状态的诊断测试的手稿。确定了许多 BRAF 测试方法,包括基于 DNA 的伴随诊断测试以及基于 DNA 和蛋白质的实验室开发的测试。本文综述了每种方法的特点,并强调了在使用每种方法和解释每个患者的结果之前应考虑的优势和劣势。分子谱分析表明,突变负荷随着黑色素瘤肿瘤的进展而增加,不同黑色素瘤亚型的遗传变化和进化轨迹具有独特的模式。原发和转移性病变之间的 BRAF 突变状态以及肿瘤内异质性的不一致性是已知的。此外,联合 BRAF 和 MEK 抑制剂治疗获得性耐药的发展仍然是一个巨大的障碍。因此,肿瘤异质性和获得性耐药的发展对分子检测以及最终晚期黑色素瘤患者的治疗具有重要意义。总的来说,这些信息可能有助于社区肿瘤学家更准确有效地解释诊断测试结果,并结合最近描述黑色素瘤肿瘤进展的数据。