Ruoff K L, Miller S I, Garner C V, Ferraro M J, Calderwood S B
Francis Blake Bacteriology Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Feb;27(2):305-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.2.305-308.1989.
Two biotypes of Streptococcus bovis can be identified by laboratory testing and can be distinguished from the phenotypically similar organism Streptococcus salivarius. We assessed the clinical relevance of careful identification of these organisms in 68 patients with streptococcal bacteremia caused by these similar species. S. bovis was more likely to be clinically significant when isolated from blood (89%) than was S. salivarius (23%). There was a striking association between S. bovis I bacteremia and underlying endocarditis (94%) compared with that of S. bovis II bacteremia (18%). Bacteremia with S. bovis I was also highly correlated with an underlying colonic neoplasm (71% of patients overall, 100% of those with thorough colonic examinations) compared with bacteremia due to S. bovis II or S. salivarius (17% overall, 25% of patients with thorough colonic examinations). We conclude that careful identification of streptococcal bacteremic isolates as S. bovis biotype I provides clinically important information and should be more widely applied.
通过实验室检测可识别出牛链球菌的两种生物型,且它们可与表型相似的唾液链球菌区分开来。我们评估了在68例由这些相似菌种引起的链球菌血症患者中仔细鉴定这些菌种的临床相关性。从血液中分离出的牛链球菌比唾液链球菌更有可能具有临床意义(分别为89%和23%)。与牛链球菌II型菌血症(18%)相比,牛链球菌I型菌血症与潜在的心内膜炎之间存在显著关联(94%)。与牛链球菌II型或唾液链球菌引起的菌血症(总体为17%,进行全面结肠检查的患者中为25%)相比,牛链球菌I型菌血症也与潜在的结肠肿瘤高度相关(总体患者中为71%,进行全面结肠检查的患者中为100%)。我们得出结论,将链球菌血症分离株仔细鉴定为牛链球菌生物型I可提供重要的临床信息,应更广泛地应用。