Meijboom Saskia, van Houts-Streppel Martinette T, Perenboom Corine, Siebelink Els, van de Wiel Anne M, Geelen Anouk, Feskens Edith J M, de Vries Jeanne H M
Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, PO Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J Nutr Sci. 2017 Sep 19;6:e49. doi: 10.1017/jns.2017.45. eCollection 2017.
Self-administered web-based 24-h dietary recalls (24 hR) may save a lot of time and money as compared with interviewer-administered telephone-based 24 hR interviews and may therefore be useful in large-scale studies. Within the Nutrition Questionnaires plus (NQplus) study, the web-based 24 hR tool Compl-eat™ was developed to assess Dutch participants' dietary intake. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of this tool against the interviewer-administered telephone-based 24 hR method. A subgroup of participants of the NQplus study (20-70 years, 514) completed three self-administered web-based 24 hR and three telephone 24 hR interviews administered by a dietitian over a 1-year period. Compl-eat™ as well as the dietitians guided the participants to report all foods consumed the previous day. Compl-eat™ on average underestimated the intake of energy by 8 %, of macronutrients by 10 % and of micronutrients by 13 % as compared with telephone recalls. The agreement between both methods, estimated using Lin's concordance coefficients (LCC), ranged from 0·15 for vitamin B to 0·70 for alcohol intake (mean LCC 0·38). The lower estimations by Compl-eat™ can be explained by a lower number of total reported foods and lower estimated intakes of the food groups, fats, oils and savoury sauces, sugar and confectionery, dairy and cheese. The performance of the tool may be improved by, for example, adding an option to automatically select frequently used foods and including more recall cues. We conclude that Compl-eat™ may be a useful tool in large-scale Dutch studies after suggested improvements have been implemented and evaluated.
与访谈员实施的基于电话的24小时膳食回顾访谈相比,自行管理的基于网络的24小时膳食回顾(24hR)可能会节省大量时间和金钱,因此可能在大规模研究中有用。在营养问卷加(NQplus)研究中,开发了基于网络的24hR工具Compl-eat™来评估荷兰参与者的膳食摄入量。本研究的目的是评估该工具相对于访谈员实施的基于电话的24hR方法的性能。NQplus研究的一个参与者亚组(20 - 70岁,514人)在1年时间内完成了三次自行管理的基于网络的24hR以及由营养师实施的三次电话24hR访谈。Compl-eat™以及营养师指导参与者报告前一天摄入的所有食物。与电话回顾相比,Compl-eat™平均低估了能量摄入量8%,宏量营养素摄入量10%,微量营养素摄入量13%。两种方法之间的一致性,使用林氏一致性系数(LCC)估计,从维生素B的0.15到酒精摄入量的0.70不等(平均LCC 0.38)。Compl-eat™较低的估计值可以通过报告的食物总数较少以及食物组、脂肪、油和咸味酱料、糖和糖果、乳制品和奶酪的估计摄入量较低来解释。例如,通过添加自动选择常用食物的选项和纳入更多回顾提示,该工具的性能可能会得到改善。我们得出结论,在实施并评估建议的改进措施后,Compl-eat™可能是荷兰大规模研究中的一个有用工具。