Nakao Minoru, Ozawa Shuichi, Yamada Kiyoshi, Yogo Katsunori, Hosono Fumika, Hayata Masahiro, Saito Akito, Miki Kentaro, Nakashima Takeo, Ochi Yusuke, Kawahara Daisuke, Morimoto Yoshiharu, Yoshizaki Toru, Nozaki Hiroshige, Habara Kosaku, Nagata Yasushi
Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, Hiroshima, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Jan;19(1):271-275. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12226. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
The accuracy of computed tomography number to electron density (CT-ED) calibration is a key component for dose calculations in an inhomogeneous medium. In a previous work, it was shown that the tolerance levels of CT-ED calibration became stricter with an increase in tissue thickness and decrease in the effective energy of a photon beam. For the last decade, a low effective energy photon beam (e.g., flattening-filter-free (FFF)) has been used in clinical sites. However, its tolerance level has not been established yet. We established a relative electron density (ED) tolerance level for each tissue type with an FFF beam. The tolerance levels were calculated using the tissue maximum ratio (TMR) and each corresponding maximum tissue thickness. To determine the relative ED tolerance level, TMR data from a Varian accelerator and the adult reference computational phantom data in the International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 110 (ICRP-110 phantom) were used in this study. The 52 tissue components of the ICRP-110 phantom were classified by mass density as five tissues groups including lung, adipose/muscle, cartilage/spongy-bone, cortical bone, and tooth tissue. In addition, the relative ED tolerance level of each tissue group was calculated when the relative dose error to local dose reached 2%. The relative ED tolerances of a 6 MVFFF beam for lung, adipose/muscle, and cartilage/spongy-bone were ±0.044, ±0.022, and ±0.044, respectively. The thicknesses of the cortical bone and tooth groups were too small to define the tolerance levels. Because the tolerance levels of CT-ED calibration are stricter with a decrease in the effective energy of the photon beam, the tolerance levels are determined by the lowest effective energy in useable beams for radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
计算机断层扫描数与电子密度(CT-ED)校准的准确性是在非均匀介质中进行剂量计算的关键组成部分。在先前的一项工作中,研究表明,随着组织厚度的增加和光子束有效能量的降低,CT-ED校准的公差水平变得更加严格。在过去十年中,临床场所一直使用低有效能量光子束(例如,无均整器(FFF))。然而,其公差水平尚未确定。我们建立了使用FFF束时每种组织类型的相对电子密度(ED)公差水平。使用组织最大比(TMR)和每个相应的最大组织厚度来计算公差水平。为了确定相对ED公差水平,本研究使用了瓦里安加速器的TMR数据和国际放射防护委员会第110号出版物(ICRP-110体模)中的成人参考计算体模数据。ICRP-110体模的52个组织成分按质量密度分为五个组织组,包括肺、脂肪/肌肉、软骨/松质骨、皮质骨和牙齿组织。此外,当局部剂量的相对剂量误差达到2%时,计算每个组织组的相对ED公差水平。6 MV FFF束对肺、脂肪/肌肉和软骨/松质骨的相对ED公差分别为±0.044、±0.022和±0.044。皮质骨组和牙齿组的厚度太小,无法确定公差水平。由于CT-ED校准的公差水平随着光子束有效能量的降低而更加严格,因此公差水平由放射治疗治疗计划系统可用束中的最低有效能量决定。