Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.030. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
Sickness absence has been regarded as an important indicator of workers' health and work productivity. This study is aimed to evaluate the association between depressive symptoms and sickness absence in workers of South Korea.
We used nationwide cross-sectional survey data from 2889 individuals in the working population aged over 19 years in South Korea. Depressive symptoms were measured using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Those respondents who scored above 10 on PHQ-9 were regarded as having depressive symptoms. Sickness absence was considered a binary variable with an absence of at least 1 day in the past month. The survey instrument contained questions about sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, work-related factors, and chronic illnesses. Logistic regression models were used to find odds ratios and confidence intervals.
The prevalence of sickness absence was found to be overall 4.6%. The adjusted odds ratio of sickness absence with depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) was 3.63 (Confidence Interval: 2.13-6.20) after controlling of possible confounders. Compared to minimal depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 < 5), the differences between other types of severity of depressive symptoms (mild, moderate, and moderately severe) in terms of mean of all sickness absences were more significant.
The sickness absence based on the memory of the respondent in this study may result in a recall bias.
Incidence of at least 1 day of sickness absence per month increased the risk of depressive symptoms after controlling for the possible confounding factors in general working population. It may be necessary to consider strategies for assessing depression in the workers who take sick leaves.
缺勤已被视为衡量劳动者健康和工作生产力的重要指标。本研究旨在评估韩国劳动者抑郁症状与缺勤之间的关系。
我们使用了韩国全国性的横断面调查数据,共纳入了 2889 名年龄在 19 岁以上的劳动人口。抑郁症状使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)进行评估。PHQ-9 得分高于 10 的被视为患有抑郁症状。缺勤被视为一个二分类变量,即过去一个月至少缺勤 1 天。调查工具包含了关于社会人口因素、生活方式、工作相关因素和慢性疾病的问题。使用逻辑回归模型来计算比值比和置信区间。
总体而言,缺勤的患病率为 4.6%。在控制了可能的混杂因素后,抑郁症状(PHQ-9 得分≥10)与缺勤的调整比值比为 3.63(95%置信区间:2.13-6.20)。与轻度抑郁症状(PHQ-9<5)相比,其他严重程度的抑郁症状(轻度、中度和中重度)在所有缺勤天数的平均值方面存在更显著的差异。
本研究中基于受访者记忆的缺勤情况可能导致回忆偏倚。
在一般劳动人群中,控制了可能的混杂因素后,每月至少缺勤 1 天的发生率会增加抑郁症状的风险。对于请病假的劳动者,可能需要考虑评估抑郁的策略。